File:De Liefdesbrief Rijksmuseum SK-A-1595.jpeg
2011-2011, The Golden Age of Dutch Painting, Doha
2009-2010, Vermeer, Rembrandt and the golden Age of Dutch Art: Masterpieces from the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam - 3, Paris
2009-2009, Vermeer, Rembrandt and the golden Age of Dutch Art: Masterpieces from the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, Vancouver (Canada)
2006-2006, Ruilbruikleen Rembrandt-Caravaggio, Rome
2005-2006, The Golden Age - Highlights from the Rijksmuseum - II - B, Kobe
2005-2005, The Golden Age - Highlights from the Rijksmuseum - I - B, Melbourne
2005-2005, Schilders van het dagelijks leven in de Hollandse 17de eeuw - II, Frankfurt am Main
2003-2003, Vermeer y el interior holandés, Madrid
References
Renate Meijer, 'De liefdesbrief', KunstKrant (2005) 4, p. 12-13.Ben Broos, 'Het gezicht op Delft en het Stinstarmysterie', Oud-Holland (1996) 1, p. 41.Markus A. Castor, 'Augenblick und Zeitfluss, Bemerkungen zu einigen Konstanten in der malerei Jan Vermeers', Patheon 54 (1996), p. 90.'Vermeer', Vrij Nederland (1996) 8 (24 febr. 1996) Bijlage.J. Koene-de Gilde, 'De brief van Vermeer', Pulchri (1996) 1, p. 31, afb.B. Diller, 'First theme', The Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art, 1975 (April), p. 112-113, afb. 11James A. Welu, 'Vermeer : his catographic sources', The Art Bulletin 58 (1975), p. 533, 541, afb. 4.S. Guiton, 'How to stop art thefts', The Conoisseur (1973), p. 64, afb.H. von Sonnenburg, 'Technical comments', Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Arts, 31 (1973), afb. 100.P.J.J. Thiel and L. Kuiper, 'Purloined, damaged, recovered, restored : Vermeer's The Letter', Delta (1973) (Spring), p. 17-34.A. Vels Heijn, 'De Liefdesbrief van Vermeer', Kunsttrip 3 (1972/73) 21.J. Van Steen, 'Is kostelijke "Liefdesbrief" geen Vermeer?', Gazet van Antwerpen 11 december 1971'Restauratie van "Liefdesbrief" mirakel?', De Standaard 11 oktober 1971."Vermeer" lag onder', Algemeen Dagblad 7 oktober 1971De restauratie van Johannes Vermeers Liefdesbrief, Proef-werkgroepbulletin : Kunsthistorisch Instituut van de Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2 (1971)Daniel A. Fink, 'Vermeer's use of the Camera Obscura - a comparative study', The Art Bulletin 53 (1971), p. 493-505.G. Ungaretti and P. Bianconi, L'opera completa di Vermeer, Milan 1967, p. 95, nr. 36, ill., pl. XLVI.L. Gowing, Vermeer, Londen 1952, p. 152, ill.R. Huyge and A. de Vries, Jan Vermeer de Delft, Paris 1948, p.XV, fig. 24,A. Hyatt Mayor, 'The photographic eye', The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin (1946), p. 19 e.v.Inzoomer object op zaal, 2013 (Nederlands/English).
Authority file
Source/Photographer
http://www.rijksmuseum.nl/collectie/SK-A-1595
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Other versions
Potential derivatives exist, check this search
(Reusing this file)
![]() |
This media file is in the public domain in the United States. This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1929, and if not then due to lack of notice or renewal. See this page for further explanation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer. ![]() |
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
Data and photography rights: "All data and all images made available through the API are either in the public domain or are subject to a CC0 license." https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/en/api/terms-and-conditions-of-use
![]() ![]() |
This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. |
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
|