Pasco-Kennewick Bridge (1922)
Construction
The bridge was completed 102 years ago in 1922 after only a year of construction, replacing an outmoded ferry system in which a single trip transported a maximum of six cars across the Columbia River. It was in fact the first bridge for vehicular traffic across the middle part of the Columbia River (only ferries and rail bridges were previously available).
Originally planned in 1913 by B. B. Horrigan, funding was not secured until 1919, when Charles G. Huber of the Union Bridge Company sold $49,000 worth of stock to finance the project, despite the country being in the grips of the Post-World War I recession. It was the first bridge of that size to be financed entirely with stock sales, and was a toll bridge for the first nine years; tolls were removed in 1931 once the initial construction costs ($480,000) had been repaid. It was also the first of three cantilever bridges built over the Columbia River in the 1920s.
The construction of the bridge was seen as a landmark in the development of the state's economy. The significance of the bridge is partly reflected in the beliefs and expectations of local and state residents who perceived the dedication as a history-making event, bringing together people from across the state; a gala affair that included speeches, car caravans, picnics, street dancing, and carnivals. As the Kennewick Courier-Reporter wrote, "The day the bridge was opened to traffic, a new era dawned for each community." The bridge was also an essential part of the old Inland Empire Highway system.
Not only did it transform the nickname "Twin Cities" into reality, but it was also a major crossing of the Columbia River, thereby making it an important part of the transcontinental Yellowstone Trail, and marked the first time that eastern and western halves of the state cooperated in the construction of something that was beneficial to both.
The state of Washington purchased the bridge in 1931 and added it to the state highway system in 1933. Benton and Franklin counties took ownership of the bridge in 1954, and then sold it to the cities of Pasco and Kennewick in 1968 for one dollar, which allowed the counties to begin planning the construction of the newer Cable Bridge.
Use
Four years after its construction, the Green Bridge carried the newly formed US 410 between Kennewick and Pasco. In 1967, US 410 was decommissioned when US 12 was expanded from Lewiston to Aberdeen. The Green Bridge carried US 12 until its closure in 1978.
Demolition
After the completion of the Cable Bridge, bridge preservationists led by Virginia Devine succeeded in placing the Pasco-Kennewick Bridge on the National Register of Historic Places. As a result, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation came to an agreement with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Washington state historic preservation office such that if the state wanted to demolish the bridge, it would then be subject to a popular vote.
In 1980, citizens of both Pasco and Kennewick voted in favor of its demolition, which then triggered a review by the FHWA to determine if any alternative uses could save the bridge from destruction. Preservationists submitted alternative plans to the FHWA, but the FHWA subsequently ruled that none of them were feasible or prudent. A lawsuit followed, with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington ruling in favor of the FHWA. The case was then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, whereupon the earlier ruling was overturned, with the order for the FHWA to conduct a more thorough review.
However, the FHWA still came to the same conclusion and the bridge was dismantled in March 1990, with most of the piers removed by the end of 1991. A proposal to keep the piers to support a new fishing pier was rejected by the Kennewick city council in 1991. One pier, as well as several wood and concrete footings portions several meters above the river bottom only visible while scuba diving, remains and serves as a scenic lookout from which the newer bridge may be seen.
See also
References
- ^ "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. April 15, 2008.
- ^ "Pasco-Kennewick Bridge over Columbia River". Lewiston Morning Tribune. (photo). October 15, 1922. p. 5.
- ^ "Dedicate bridge". Lewiston Morning Tribune. October 22, 1922. p. 2.
- ^ "Span of Time to Claim Tri-Cities Bridge". Associated Press. November 11, 1981. Retrieved November 20, 2009.
- ^ Dorpat, Paul; Sherrard, Jean (2007). Washington Then & Now. Big Earth Publishing. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-56579-547-1.
- ^ Soderberg, Lisa (October 1980). "Pasco–Kennewick Bridge" (PDF). Historic American Engineering Record. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. Retrieved September 18, 2022.
- ^ Gibson, Elizabeth (October 31, 2005). "Pasco-Kennewick (Benton-Franklin Inter-County) Bridge spanning the Columbia River is dedicated on October 21, 1922". HistoryLink. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
- ^ MacNey, Malcolm (October 17, 1965). "Tri-Citians Celebrate When Old-Bridge Tolls Removed In 1931". Tri-City Herald. p. 26.
- ^ Jackson, Donald C.; McCullough, David G. (1988). Great American Bridges and Dams. John Wiley & Sons. p. 314. ISBN 0-471-14385-5.
- ^ "Cities Decide to Buy Bridge". Spokane Daily Chronicle. August 3, 1968. Retrieved November 20, 2009.
- ^ Williams, Laurie (January 8, 1987). "Keep old bridge, AARP report says". Tri-City Herald. p. A1.
- ^ Jackson & McCullough, pp. 68–70
- ^ Lindblom, Mike (March 21, 1990). "Piers all that's left of bridge". Tri-City Herald. p. A3.
- ^ Donley, Jack (February 20, 1991). "Kennewick OKs Vista Field transfer". Tri-City Herald. p. A3.
External links
Media related to Pasco-Kennewick Bridge at Wikimedia Commons
- Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. WA-8, "Pasco–Kennewick Bridge, Spanning Columbia River, Pasco, Franklin County, WA", 18 photos, 7 data pages, 2 photo caption pages
- Pasco-Kennewick Bridge at Structurae
- Benton Franklin Riverfront Trailway and Bridge Committee v. Lewis Archived 2008-06-05 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 701 F.2d 784