Psittacosaurus
Psittacosaurus was one of the earliest ceratopsians, but closer to Triceratops than Yinlong. Once in its own family, Psittacosauridae, with other genera like Hongshanosaurus, it is now considered to be senior synonym of the latter and an early offshoot of the branch that led to more derived forms. The genera closely related to Psittacosaurus are all from Asia, with the exception of Aquilops, from North America. The first species was either P. lujiatunensis or closely related, and it may have given rise to later forms of Psittacosaurus.
Psittacosaurus is one of the most completely known dinosaur genera. Fossils of hundreds of individuals have been collected so far, including many complete skeletons. Most age classes are represented, from hatchling through to adult, which has allowed several detailed studies of Psittacosaurus growth rates and reproductive biology. The abundance of this dinosaur in the fossil record has led to the labelling of Lower Cretaceous sediments of east Asia the Psittacosaurus biochron.
History of discovery
In 1922, American paleontologist Henry Fairfield Osborn took part in the Third Asiatic Expedition of the American Museum of Natural History to discover fossils and geologic formations from the Cretaceous and Tertiary of Mongolia. In the Oshih Formation of the Artsa Bogdo Basin, Wong, the Mongolian chauffeur, discovered a nearly complete skull, jaws, and skeleton of a dinosaur, which was given the nickname of "Red Mesa skeleton". The location of discovery is also known as the Oshih locality of the Khukhtek Formation, of Early Cretaceous Aptian to Albian age. The specimen, catalogued as AMNH 6254, was described in 1924 by Osborn, only partially prepared, who gave it the name Psittacosaurus mongoliensis, describing its parrot-like beak on the suggestion of fellow American paleontologist William King Gregory. Osborn demonstrated the taxon was unique based on the short and deep snout, and the broad rear skull, as well as by lacking teeth in the premaxilla. In the same paper, Osborn also described another new taxon he considered similar to Psittacosaurus, Protiguanodon mongoliense, which was found in the same expedition but from the Ondai Sair Formation. The holotype of Protiguanodon, AMNH 6253, included a nearly complete skeleton found articulated, and partial remains of the skull. While Osborn considered Protiguanodon and Psittacosaurus separate based on the lack of horns on the jugal bones in Protiguanodon, a general dissimilarity in the skeletons, and wide geographic separation of the two specimens, Gregory suggested in correspondence that the Protiguanodon specimen could represent a juvenile of Psittacosaurus, based on similarities in size, the parietal bones, and the quadrate bones. Osborn created the new family Psittacosauridae for Psittacosaurus, which he considered possibly related to Ankylosauria, while he placed Protiguanodon within the family Iguanodontidae as the only member of the new subfamily Protiguanodontinae.
Osborn published an additional description of the specimens of Protiguanodon and Psittacosaurus in 1924, citing his previous study as naming both to be members of Psittacosauridae, and considering the separate status of Protiguanodontinae as uncertain. Further preparation of the skeleton of AMNH 6254 showed significant similarities in the skeletons of Psittacosaurus and Protiguanodon, including the number of teeth, the number of pre-caudal vertebrae, and other details of the skull and skeleton. Osborn also referred the specimen AMNH 6261 from the Oshih Formation to Psittacosaurus, so the teeth of the two taxa could be compared. It was mentioned in 1932 by American paleontologist Roy Chapman Andrews that AMHN 6254 was the only good specimen that could be found at Oshih, with only one additional skull and jaws of an adult, and two hatchling skulls, having been found in a later revisit to the locality in 1923.
Following the discovery of material of psittacosaurids in Haratologay in Inner Mongolia, Yang Zhongjian described two additional species in 1932. Known from a crushed skull and fragmentary lower jaw, Young named Psittacosaurus osborni, distinguished by its small size and lack of a sagittal crest on the parietal. The second species, P. tingi, was named for partial lower jaws and teeth, which Young only tentatively referred to Psittacosaurus instead of Protiguanodon. Both specimens, stored in the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology as IVPP RV31039 and IVPP RV31040 respectively, come from the Xinpongnaobao Formation. An additional tooth, partial hand, and fragments of vertebrae and limbs were found in the same locality, with the tooth being referred to Protiguanodon and the remainder of the material being uncertain. Additional Psittacosaurus material from possibly the same locality was described later in 1953 by Birger Bohlin, who considered the remains to likely belong to P. mongoliensis.
The Soviet Expeditions into Mongolia from 1946 to 1949 uncovered more material of Psittacosaurus. In 1946 they discovered a new locality, Ulan Osh, where a disarticulated specimen of Psittacosaurus mongoliensis was found, and in 1948 they revisited the sites of the American expeditions and excavated fragmentary postcrania from Oshih and Ondai Sair. The material from these expeditions was taken to the Paleontological Institute of Moscow. Soviet excavations near Kemerovo in Siberia also discovered a partial skull and skeleton of multiple individuals referrable to Psittacosaurus. This material was described by Soviet paleontologist Anatoly Rozhdestvensky in 1955, who also proposed that Protiguanodon mongoliense, Psittacosaurus osborni, and Psittacosaurus tingi were junior synonyms of Psittacosaurus mongoliensis.
In 1958, Yang published a paper on the dinosaurs of Laiyang, in which he described multiple discoveries of Psittacosaurus from a collection of localities of the Qingshan Formation. Of this material, the nearly complete skeleton and skull IVPP V738 was described as the type of the new species Psittacosaurus sinensis, which was found in a red layer 10 mi (16 km) northwest of Rongyang City in Shandong. Yang also assigned 11 other specimens to the taxon, considering it to be the most diverse Psittacosaurus species known at the time. It was distinguished from the other known species by a shorter and wider snout, and an overall smaller size at 675 mm (26.6 in). Yang also revised the classifications of the other species of Psittacosaurus. Following similar conclusions to Rozhdestvensky, Yang considered Protiguanodon to be a junior synonym of Psittacosaurus, but retained the species as separate giving former Protiguanodon mongoliense the new species name Psittacosaurus protiguanodonensis, as otherwise both it and Psittacosaurus mongoliensis would have the same species name. Contrasting Rozhdestvensky, Yang retained the earlier Chinese species P. osborni and P. tingi as separate from P. mongoliensis, but not separate from each other, making P. tingi a junior synonym of P. osborni. Following his new breakdown of species, Yang described the distribution of the genus Psittacosaurus: P. sinensis was the only species known from Shandong; P. osborni and possibly P. mongoliensis were both known from Haratologay (also known as Tebch); P. mongoliensis and P. protiguanodonensis were both known form Oshih; and P. mongoliensis was possibly known from Kemerovo.
Further discoveries in the Qingshan Formation of Laiyang in 1958 were described by Zhao Xijin in 1962, giving the new name Psittacosaurus youngi for the specimen BPV.149 in the Beijing Museum of Natural History. Known for a complete skull, partial vertebral series and partial pelvis, P. youngi was distinguished by Zhao by having the shortest skull of all species, vertebral and tooth counts, and various features of the skull and skeleton. P. youngi was considered to be most similar to P. sinensis, but separated them to bring the count of members of Psittacosauridae to one genus and five species.
Many later expeditions by various combinations of Mongolian, Russian, Chinese, American, Polish, Japanese, and Canadian paleontologists also recovered specimens from throughout Mongolia and northern China. In these areas, Psittacosaurus mongoliensis fossils are found in most sedimentary strata dating to the Aptian to Albian stages of the Early Cretaceous Period, or approximately 125 to 100 mya. Fossil remains of over 75 individuals have been recovered, including nearly 20 complete skeletons with skulls. Individuals of all ages are known, from hatchlings less than 13 centimetres (5.1 in) long, to very old adults reaching nearly 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) in length.
In a 2010 review, Sereno again regarded P. osborni as a synonym of P. mongoliensis, but noted it was tentative because of the presence of multiple valid psittacosaur species in Inner Mongolia. Young also described the species P. tingi in the same 1931 report which contained P. osborni. It is based on several skull fragments. He later synonymised the two species under the name P. osborni. You and Dodson (2004) followed this in a table, but Sereno regarded both species as synonyms of P. mongoliensis; a table in the latter reported P. tingi as a nomen dubium, however. The front half of a skull from Guyang County in Inner Mongolia was described as Psittacosaurus guyangensis in 1983. Disarticulated postcranial remains representing multiple individuals were found at the same locality and were assigned to the species. While it differs from the type specimen of P. mongoliensis, it falls within the range of individual variation seen in other specimens of that species and is no longer recognised as a valid species. You and Dodson (2004) included P. guyangensis in a table of valid taxa, but did not include it as such in their text.
Assigned species
Seventeen species have been referred to the genus Psittacosaurus, although only nine to eleven are considered valid today. This is the highest number of valid species currently assigned to any single non-avian dinosaur. In contrast, most other dinosaur genera are monospecific, containing only a single known species. The difference is most likely due to artifacts of the fossilisation process. While Psittacosaurus is known from hundreds of fossil specimens, most other dinosaur species are known from far fewer, and many are represented by only a single specimen. With a very high sample size, the diversity of Psittacosaurus can be analysed more completely than that of most dinosaur genera, resulting in the recognition of more species. Most extant animal genera are represented by multiple species, suggesting that this may have been the case for extinct dinosaur genera as well, although most of these species may not have been preserved. In addition, most dinosaurs are known solely from bones and can only be evaluated from a morphological standpoint, whereas extant species often have very similar skeletal morphology but differ in other ways which would not normally be preserved in the fossil record, such as behaviour, or colouration. Therefore, actual species diversity may be much higher than currently recognised in this and other dinosaur genera. As some species are known only from skull material, species of Psittacosaurus are primarily distinguished by features of the skull and teeth. Several species can be recognised by features of the pelvis as well.
- P. sinensis
In the 1950s, a new Chinese species of Psittacosaurus was found in the Aptian-Albian Qingshan Formation of Shandong Province, southeast of Beijing. C. C. Young called it P. sinensis to differentiate it from P. mongoliensis, which had originally been found in Mongolia. Fossils of more than twenty individuals have since been recovered, including several complete skulls and skeletons, making this the most well-known species after P. mongoliensis. Chinese paleontologist Zhao Xijin named a new species after his mentor, C. C. Young, in 1962. However, the type specimen of P. youngi (a partial skeleton and skull) was discovered in the same rocks as P. sinensis and appears to be very similar, so P. youngi is generally considered a junior synonym of that better-known species. As with P. guyangensis and P. osborni, You and Dodson (2004) listed it as valid in a table, but not in their text.
- P. xinjiangensis
In 1988, Zhao and American paleontologist Paul Sereno described P. xinjiangensis, named after the Xinjiang Autonomous Region in which it was discovered. Several individuals of different ages were discovered in the early 1970s by Chinese paleontologists and described by Sereno and Zhao, although the holotype and most complete skeleton belonged to a juvenile. An adult skeleton was later discovered at a different locality in Xinjiang. These specimens come from the upper part of the Tugulu Group, which is regarded as Aptian-Albian in age.
- P. meileyingensis
A second species described in 1988 by Sereno and Zhao, along with two Chinese colleagues, was P. meileyingensis from the Jiufotang Formation, near the town of Meileyingzi, Liaoning Province, northeastern China. This species is known from four fossil skulls, one associated with some skeletal material, found in 1973 by Chinese scientists. The age of the Jiufotang in Liaoning is unknown, but in the neighbouring province of Inner Mongolia, it has been dated to about 110 Ma, in the Albian stage of the Early Cretaceous.
- P. sattayaraki
French paleontologist Eric Buffetaut and a Thai colleague, Varavudh Suteethorn, described a partial upper and lower jaw from the Aptian-Albian Khok Kruat Formation of Thailand in 1992, giving it the name P. sattayaraki. In 2000, Sereno questioned the validity of this species, citing its eroded and fragmentary nature, and noted an absence of features characteristic of the genus Psittacosaurus. However, in 2002 the original authors published new images of the fossil which seem to show teeth in the lower jaw that exhibit the bulbous vertical ridge characteristic of psittacosaurs. Other authors have also defended its validity, while some continue to regard it as dubious. Sereno (2010) proposed that the best assignment for the type material may be Ceratopsia incertae sedis.
- P. neimongoliensis and P. ordosensis?
Two new species of Psittacosaurus were described by Canadian Dale Russell and Zhao in 1996. The first was named P. neimongoliensis, after the Mandarin Chinese name for Inner Mongolia. It is based on a nearly complete fossil skeleton, including most of the skull, found in the Early Cretaceous Ejinhoro Formation with seven other individuals. Russell and Zhao also named P. ordosensis in 1996, after the Ordos prefecture of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. The type specimen is a nearly complete skeleton, including part of the skull. However, only the skull, lower jaw, and foot have been described. Three other specimens were referred to this species but remain undescribed. Like P. neimongoliensis, this species was discovered in the Eijnhoro Formation. Sereno (2010) found the species as described to be indistinguishable from P. sinensis, another small species, but suggested that additional study of P. ordosensis might reveal diagnostic features. He provisionally designated P. ordosensis a nomen dubium.
- P. mazongshanensis?
Xu Xing, another Chinese paleontologist, named a new species of Psittacosaurus in 1997, based on a complete skull with associated vertebrae and a forelimb. This material was recovered in Gansu Province, near the border with Inner Mongolia. This species is named P. mazongshanensis after the nearby mountain called Mazongshan (Horse Mane Mountain) and has been described in a preliminary manner. Unfortunately, the skull was damaged while in the care of the Chinese Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP), and several fragments have been lost, including all of the teeth. The remains were found in the Lower Xinminbao Formation, which have not been precisely dated, although there is some evidence that they were deposited in the late Barremian through Aptian stages. Sereno suggested in 2000 that P. mazongshanensis was a nomen dubium, with no unique features that separate it from any other species of Psittacosaurus. However, more recent authors have noted that it can be distinguished by its proportionally long snout compared to other species of Psittacosaurus, as well as a prominent bony protuberance, pointing outwards and downwards, on the maxilla of the upper jaw. The maxillary protuberance is also now missing. Other features originally used to distinguish the species have been recognised as the results of the deformation of the skull after fossilisation. Sereno (2010) remained unconvinced of its validity.
- P. sibiricus
Beginning in the 1950s, Russian paleontologists began excavating Psittacosaurus remains at a locality near Shestakovo village in Kemerovo Oblast in Western Siberia. Two other nearby localities were explored in the 1990s, one of which produced several complete skeletons. This species was named P. sibiricus in 2000 in a scientific paper written by five Russian paleontologists, but credit for the name is officially given to two of those authors, Alexei Voronkevich and Alexander Averianov. The remains were not completely described until 2006. Two nearly complete, articulated skeletons and a variety of disarticulated material from other individuals of all ages are known from the Ilek Formation of Siberia, which ranges from the Barremian to Aptian stages of the Early Cretaceous. Individuals of this species could grow up to 2.5 meters in length, making it one of the largest members of the genus.
- P. lujiatunensis
P. lujiatunensis, named in 2006 by Chinese paleontologist Zhou Chang-Fu and three Chinese and Canadian colleagues, is one of the oldest-known species, based on four skulls from the lower beds of the Yixian Formation, near the village of Lujiatun. While this bed has been dated differently by different authors, from 128 Ma in the Barremian stage, to 125 Ma in the earliest Aptian, revised dating methods have shown them to be about 123 million years old. P. lujiatunensis was contemporaneous with another psittacosaurid species, Hongshanosaurus houi, which was found in the same beds. It is potentially synonymous with H. houi; Sereno (2010), who proposed that Hongshanosaurus is a synonym of Psittacosaurus, opted to leave P. lujiatunensis and H. houi separate species due to the inadequacies of the latter's type specimen.
- P. major
One nearly complete skeleton of P. lujiatunensis from the same lower beds of the Yixian Formation had previously been classified in its own species, Psittacosaurus major, named for the large size of its skull by Sereno, Zhao and two colleagues in 2007. You and colleagues described an additional specimen and concurred that it was distinct from P. lujiatunensis. P. major was originally characterised by a proportionately large skull, which was 39% of the length of its torso, compared to 30% in P. mongoliensis, and other features. However, a 2013 study utilising morphometric analysis showed that the supposed differences between P. lujiatunensis and P. major were due to differences in preservation and crushing. The study concluded that both represented a single species.
- P. houi?
A third species of Lujiatun psittacosaur, the first to be named, was described as Hongshanosaurus houi in 2003. The generic name Hongshanosaurus was derived from the Mandarin Chinese words 紅 (hóng: "red") and 山 (shān: "hill"), as well as the Greek word sauros ("lizard"). This name refers to the ancient Hongshan culture of northeastern China, who lived in the same general area in which the fossil skull of Hongshanosaurus was found. The type and only named species, H. houi, honours Hou Lianhai, a professor at the IVPP in Beijing, who curated the specimen. Genus and species were both named by Chinese paleontologists You Hailu, Xu Xing, and Wang Xiaolin in 2003. Sereno (2010) regarded its distinct proportions as due to crushing and compression of the Hongshanosaurus skulls. He regarded Hongshanosaurus as a junior synonym of Psittacosaurus, and potentially the same as P. lujiatunensis. He did not synonymise the two species because of difficulties with the holotype skull of H. houi, instead considering new combination P. houi a nomen dubium within Psittacosaurus. Sereno's hypothesis was supported by a morphometric study in 2013, which found P. houi and P. lujiatunensis to be synonymous. While P. houi is the oldest available name, the researchers argued that because the type specimen of P. lujiatunensis was better preserved, the correct name for this species should be P. lujiatunensis rather than P. houi, which would normally have priority.
- P. gobiensis
P. gobiensis is named for the region it was found in 2001, and first described by Sereno, Zhao and Lin in 2010. It is known from a skull and partial articulated skeleton with gastroliths. Many other specimens either cannot be determined to belong to any particular species, or have not yet been assigned to one. These specimens are generally all referred to as Psittacosaurus sp., although it is not assumed that they belong to the same species. More than 200 specimens of Psittacosaurus have been found in the Yixian Formation, which is famous for its fossils of feathered dinosaurs. The vast majority of these have not been assigned to any published species, although many are very well preserved and some have already been partially described. Nearly 100 Psittacosaurus skeletons were excavated in Mongolia during the summers of 2005 and 2006 by a team led by Mongolian paleontologist Bolortsetseg Minjin and American Jack Horner from the Museum of the Rockies in Montana. Although only P. mongoliensis has been described from Mongolia so far, these specimens are still in preparation and have not yet been assigned to a species.
- P. amitabha
P. amitabha was named by Napoli et al. in 2019 from a complete skull and partial skeleton. recovered in the Barremian Andakhuduk Formation of Mongolia. It is named after Amitabha Buddha.
Description
The species of Psittacosaurus vary in size and specific features of the skull and skeleton, but share the same overall body shape. The best-known—P. mongoliensis—can reach 2 metres (6.5 ft) in length. The maximum adult body weight was most likely over 20 kilogrammes (44 lb) in P. mongoliensis. Several species approach P. mongoliensis in size (P. lujiatunensis, P. neimongoliensis, P. xinjiangensis), while others are somewhat smaller (P. sinensis, P. meileyingensis). The smallest known species, P. ordosensis, is 30% smaller than P. mongoliensis. The largest are P. lujiatunensis and P. sibiricus, although neither is significantly larger than P. mongoliensis. Psittacosaurus postcranial skeletons are more typical of a 'generic' bipedal ornithischian. There are only four digits on the manus ('hand'), as opposed to the five found in most other ornithischians (including all other ceratopsians), while the four-toed hindfoot is very similar to many other small ornithischians.
The skull of Psittacosaurus is highly modified compared to other ornithischian dinosaurs of its time. Extremely tall in height and short in length, the skull has an almost round profile in some species. The portion in front of the orbit (eye socket) is only 40% of total skull length, shorter than any other known ornithischian. The lower jaws of psittacosaurs are characterised by a bulbous vertical ridge down the centre of each tooth. Both upper and lower jaws sport a pronounced beak, formed from the rostral and predentary bones, respectively. The bony core of the beak may have been sheathed in keratin to provide a sharp cutting surface for cropping plant material. As the generic name suggests, the short skull and beak superficially resemble those of modern parrots. Psittacosaurus skulls share several adaptations with more derived ceratopsians, such as the unique rostral bone at the tip of the upper jaw, and the flared jugal (cheek) bones. There is still no sign of the bony neck frill or prominent facial horns which would develop in later ceratopsians. Bony horns protrude from the skull of P. sibiricus, but these are thought to be an example of convergent evolution.