A nephew once asked me when he was quite young Who dies? I said Everyone dies
No use denying it one day you're done
Oh everyone dies
Princes & paupers there's no one immune
And no one who'll escape their demise
So you'd better make use of each day that you're given
Oh everyone dies
Now people have pondered this time and again
Who dies? Everyone dies
Some suspect that we're more than mere mortal remains
Oh everyone dies
Wise men & prophets they've all had their say
On the nature of afterlives
But since there's no beer there we'll have one more round
Oh everyone dies
Your time may be short or your time may be long Who dies? Everyone dies.
But it's going to happen as sure as you're born
Oh everyone dies
Friends and relations and all we hold dear
Will one day pass to the other side
So we'd better embrace them as long as they're here
Oh everyone dies
This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than 15 years (18 years, 9 months, and 5 days).
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Not Mid Atlantic Baby. PhilKnight (talk) 20:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
Macbook01(talk·contribs·deleted contribs·nuke contribs·logs·filter log·block user·block log) – On Billy Long: vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeated edit warring, original research and promotional editing, with a possible COI based on an edit summary for an edit on another article where they stated they worked for the government. R0paire 22:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting.Bbb23 (talk) 23:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Although Hitler is the best-known Adolf, the Christian name is not per se offensive. Bishonen | tålk 02:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. For at least 3 weeks. Out of precaution, admittedly, since the Chiefs (and the Eagles) are heading to Super Bowl LIX. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A day or so ago this might have been justified, but that dispute seems to have cooled. And "Out of precaution, admittedly" is basically a request for pre-emptive protection, which outside of certain situations in ArbCom cases we don't grant. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Highly politicized article with inevitable potential for POV pushing, which has already seen some IP edits be reverted. (Yes, I'm aware there is a current deletion discussion and a current move request for this, but the deletion discussion seems decided on keeping it and the move request wouldn't prevent protection.). O.N.R. 16:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much disruption from IPs ... on an article like this there's going to be a lot of well-intended edits that get reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring and vandalism Imconfused3456 23:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done Right now there are a lot of edits going on in that article so I'm going to hold off for right now but if it starts to go downhill feel free to ping me. Dr vulpes(Talk) 01:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism; this problem is plaguing the article for quite some time now; see its talk page. The current list is completely messed up again. Should restore the correct version and protect the page. Maxeto0910 (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Mastkodont is IP hopping and vandalizing this page since September. I suggest an indef semi of this page. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 23:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Other admins have put in IP bans. Dr vulpes(Talk) 01:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting permanent pending changes protection. Over the years this article has been prone to vandalism, spam and promotional additions from new and anonymous users. These edits, however, have come in waves, and unfortunately they are sometimes unnoticed. Take for example the edits this month. I think this article would benefit from protection that does not restrict editing but subjects it to review, as many of the appropriate edits are from less experienced editors, but also many of the inappropriate ones. Yue🌙 00:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I do not like to protect a page indefinitely unless it's seriously needed. There does appear to be some problems here so let's see if this helps deal with it and if not we can revisit it in a few months. Dr vulpes(Talk) 01:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Repeated unsubstantiated and false claims about performance from anonymous users
Automated comment:Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—Talk to my owner:Online 01:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment:@Cyberbot I: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—Talk to my owner:Online 01:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Modified by Jo-Jo Eumerus on 2016-08-18: "Highly visible template: Protecting admin inactive, no need for high protection given the only moderately high usage"
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.
Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.
Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia.
I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards.
I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Reason for requesting confirmed rights:
I need it because I'm making an article and need an fair photo Sheagolddigger (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Beeblebrox 03:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.
Extended confirmed
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done at this time, but if you enroll in WP:NPRSCHOOL I would be more than willing to give you this permission. Dr vulpes(Talk) 07:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Just as a follow up NPPSCHOOL is not required for this permission. It's something I personally did and got a lot of benefit from. Dr vulpes(Talk) 10:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostundmppria 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly.
I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles.
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot 07:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done at this time, but if you enroll in WP:NPRSCHOOL I would be more than willing to give you this permission. Dr vulpes(Talk) 07:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 50 articles across different categories, and I am an active user with 2000+ edit’s. Therefore, I would like to request the Trail New Page Reviewer rights. Thank you! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 08:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot 18:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot 07:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I have had page mover temporarily since November 2024. I believe I have made good use of it, and since it will expire automatically in a week I am here to request it be extended. I have handled around eighty requests at WP:RM/TRlink and closed a few RMs. As far as I remember, the only conflict was about my close of an RM at Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (discussion can be found on my Talk page). Toadspike[Talk] 17:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Extraordinary Writ (expires 00:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot 17:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Done extended three months Dr vulpes(Talk) 02:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊(Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Do you find yourself actually needing this, or are you just ticking the box because you meet the minimum requirements? Primefac (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use it so I could perform more moves as right now I can't do most of them without this permission. @PrimefacHistory6042😊(Contact me) 17:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay(talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Do you find yourself actually needing this, or are you just ticking the box because you meet the minimum requirements? I note that you have an RM/TR request and a couple of G6's, but otherwise not much in the way of necessity so far. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Currently I'm avoiding some NAC because I am not really a fan of using TR because what I've found is that the admin who does perform the TR ends up doing all of the busy work (post move cleanup). IMHO the closer should perform the dirty work of cleaning up the move, and I'm happy to do so. I would see myself closing more discussions if the bit was available. That is the reason for the low number of current TR/G6, but you can see the frequency I previously require those tools prior to a wikibreak over at my CSD log. For me the bit is not about hat collecting, but rather simply because I'm getting back involved in Wiki (due to life-schedule changes) and as a formerly trusted and well-reputed RM-NAC, these tools would make more closures with follow-on work accessible. TiggerJay(talk) 01:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit articles on biology, particularly fishes. I frequently (over 300 times so far, I am told) have to request a move of the only species in a monotypic genus from the species name to the genus name,as per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, over a redirect, and would like to be able to do this without having to request a move. Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Done. Primefac (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDINGBryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Not at this time due to limited editing experience but please do apply again later.Dr vulpes(Talk) 19:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary(talk2me!)(stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Done If you run into any problems or have any questions please feel free to leave a message for me on my talk page. Dr vulpes(Talk) 19:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Done Trial period of three months, feel free to come back and request an extension of a permanent assignment of this permission. If you run into any problems please feel free to leave a message for me on my talk page. Dr vulpes(Talk) 19:39, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm very active on Wikipedia, with over 2,100 edits, and I'm well acquainted with WP:VAND and what vandalism is not. I can contribute to reducing backlogs by reviewing pending changes. Mr.HanesTalk 19:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Done Trial period of three months, feel free to come back and request an extension of a permanent assignment of this permission. If you run into any problems please feel free to leave a message for me on my talk page. Dr vulpes(Talk) 19:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements.
Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting.
Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot 19:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.
Template editor
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online
Wikipedia editor
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Doug_Weller.
Barnstars
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you! Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
