• 21 Aug, 2019

• By, Wikipedia

User:Ethanpet113

This user is using this award because it's sparkly, not because they actually deserve it.If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.

---

Oh hai! I'm in ur article fixing ur logic.

I hate weasel words, and will do my best to violently edit articles so they conform to the following principles:

• Reductionism
• Cohesion

If you're an editor who has found their way here, sorry in advance, I like to do a lot of WP:Cleanup since, it's way easier to tag incorrect or biased statements than it is to cite a more trustworthy source. I administer the Bad Citation Bot

I don't like to accept information just because it's in vogue, sometimes this means I stir the pot with my edits. I would appreciate if you make an effort to modify my edits instead of reverting them wholesale, I like Wikipedia to have a variety of opinions, and sometimes this means my edits are overzealous, but I don't have all kinds of time to make them perfect. I've taken to running some experiments, to test the editorial process of the wiki, whether it can be trusted as neutral, and to what extent it allows weaker evidence. I would never create an article I believed to contain outright falsehood, but conveniently history is stranger than fiction so there's plenty of strange phenomenon, which is not well documented, but can said to have some encyclopedic value. In other words I like creating articles which I expect to be kept, but which are likely to have strong discussion.

Oooh sparkly

This user wants to make Wikipedia verifiable again.

This user thinks you can learn a lot by editing an Encyclopedia.

This user wants to compile and preserve the sum of all human knowledge.

Everyone has points of view with inherent cultural biases - recognition is the first step to achieving NPOV.

This user wants YOU to properly cite your sources!

This user enjoys tagging pages for problems.

This user dislikes policy creep and understands that some consider it a big reason for Wikipedia's decline in participation.

This user prefers citation templates.

This user doesn't invoke conspiracy as explanation, when ignorance and incompetence will suffice.

This user is a skeptic.

${\displaystyle \Diamond x\!\!\rightarrow \!\!\Box x}$

This user lives in a mathematical universe.

This user believes that the meaning of life is to live a happy life.

This user believes in logic.

This user is a rationalist who believes "common sense" is a worthless delusion and prefers to use reason.

This user believes science, practiced through the scientific method, is the most reliable way of determining the nature of reality.

This user is an empiricist who believes knowledge is subject to continued revision and falsification.

This user is a pessimist.

This user is interested in economics.