I am Infolover45. I have joined because I believe in having accurate, unbiased information. There are no projects going on right now, but a plan I have is to TRY MY BEST to make an article on, of all things, a book series that encompasses every last digit of a googleplex, but I think that might go horribly wrong, I will try to find non-primary sources, as I have learned from the BOMBSHELL that my last project was, and hope I can make it as much of a non-stub page as possible, it might just be one though because it is so self-explanatory. go here for the talk page. Update: I might actually mostly be focusing on the comedy side of Wikipedia, because I find it to be an underrated section of it, and I love it quite a bit

Yeah, that one I am not so proud of, it broke too many Wikipedia guidelines, almost none of the "improvements" I made were kept, here is an archived version of the article's last moments with these fails, and I only figured these out once I tried to propose something to the guys at the actual project page, and learned why I should read the guidelines the hard way... This old version has a million errors like, citing primary sources and going into depths on UNIMPORTANT details, and was just a train wreck, mainly caused by me. I caused all this, just because I play Drawception myself, and tried making the article accurate, but I did not read the guidelines, so, yeah. Will not forget reading important guidelines again, because, I screwed up!

Yep! I served in the 2019 edit war of April the first. Crazy day for me...

)