Loading
  • 21 Aug, 2019

  • By, Wikipedia

User:SafariScribe

Citer

Pending changes AFC help

NPP browser

WP Library
NewbieNGUSIndiaENGScotlandWales[stat]


SafariScribe
SafariScribe, Wikipedian

Watchlist box

Deletion process (Deletion policy)
XFD N N-1 N-2 N-3 N-4 N-5 N-6
AFD
CFD
TFD
DRV

CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 41
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 84
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 48
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 2
Open sockpuppet investigations 90
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

Administrative backlog

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

User-reported

  • User:GeneralAres is not here to build an encyclopedia. Personal attacks, disruptive and nationalist editing, etc. Jingiby (talk) 11:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 1

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. 23:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. 23:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: High-profile talk page of a film draft which has been subject to never-ending discussions from IPs berating about reports being included in the draft and other comments that have veered off-course into WP:NOTAFORUM areas for several months now, and show no sign of ceasing, which is unusual for a draft article. Requesting ECP protection of this talk to help ease the workflow and keep such discussions constructive. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 11:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit war Junsik1223 (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit war (the same issue as Sachicasaurus article) Junsik1223 (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Indefinite ECP Constant abuse by semi users and Arbitration Enforcement. Protoeus (talk) 01:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—Talk to my owner:Online 01:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 01:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—Talk to my owner:Online 01:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP Hopper we simply not here.... Infamous IP see also spammer... too many numerous shocks to deal asking to get page protected. Moxy🍁 02:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. C F A 02:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 11:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jet Pilot (talk) 03:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Isabelle Belato 11:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Odd recurring vandalism with non-English text. ~Darth Stabro 03:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring between various birth years. CRBoyer 03:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 10:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Favourite of blocked IP 185.146.112.192 & various socks. Two other pages have been reported via AIV. The moment a block wears off, the IP is back or just tries a different sock. Blue Sonnet (talk) 05:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent and repeated nonsense from IPs. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated reversion of factual, sourced edits by an unregistered IP editor who has not engaged in discussion despite multiple attempts. This disruption hinders constructive editing and violates WP:CONSENSUS. Semi-protection is requested to prevent further unproductive reversions. UwU.Raihanur (talk) 06:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting either lengthy WP:SEMI or permanent WP:WHITELOCK due to excess page blanking that's mostly coming from IPv6 addresses. 67.209.130.73 (talk) 07:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 11:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same unsourced additions by IPs began soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive by IP restoring contentious WP:LEADFIX edits.

PS: WP:ARBAIC sanctions may also apply considering the involvement of the editor [whose edits are being restored] (and other users editing the article) in that topic area ([1], [2]). Gotitbro (talk) 08:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 08:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: To save neutrality of article as people may try to vandalize it and edit wars. NAUser0001 (talk) 09:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


I would like to request that you either add the technical reasons redirect hatnote into the {{Hatgrp}} template or dismantle that template. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 10:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

3 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2024-12-16 14:26 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
Module:WikiProject banner (request) 2024-12-18 22:58 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-12-24 11:47 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
4 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Nihongo (request) 2024-12-06 16:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-11-26: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Template for discussion/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2016-10-30: ""
Template:Tfm/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tfm/dated: Protected by Ged UK on 2013-11-12: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox food (request) 2024-12-27 11:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:09, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online

RFP= Requests for permissions

Autopatrolled

I respectfully request autopatrol and patrol rights, based on my extensive experience and contributions to Wikipedia. With over 12 months of experience, I've created 60+ articles and improved 100+ others. Granting my request will streamline the New Page Patrol process. I previously requested these rights last month, which was denied. Since then, I've improved my contributions. I believe my dedication and improvement warrant reconsideration. Thank you for considering my request. Royalesignature (talk). 03:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot 03:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I recently raised issues of close paraphrasing in one of your drafts Special:Permalink/1263547974, I am sure if I check more of your creations now, I will find similar issues. Your creations need a second eye and that is what NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Nominating this editor for Autopatrolled based on a long history of high-quality page creation (80 new articles created in mainspace, with just one deleted a few years ago). Good encyclopedic style, excellent use of sources, images, formatting etc.; also creates talk pages. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

Hi, I am requesting for this rights, because I have about 5 new articles that are yet to be reviewed and surely meets the notability criteria, I have been creating and improving articles especially on African Cinema and with this right, I hope to reduce the backlog on the new page reviewers log.

Best regards, B.Korlah (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


Confirmed

File mover

Hello, I primarily work with files on Wikimedia Commons, where I have file mover and autopatrol rights. The process of file moving on English Wikipedia is almost the same as the practices on Commons. I also have experience working on files on English Wikipedia, including submitting several rename requests. Moreover, I have file mover rights on Bengali Wikipedia, further demonstrating my familiarity with file management across Wikimedia projects. I am familiar with Wikipedia:File names and request this right to enhance my work. Thanks.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 05:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover


Pending changes reviewer

I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Have close to 1,100 edits as of making this request. I enjoy improving articles, I review recent changes daily by this point and am familiar with reverting vandalism (and distinguishing it from good faith edits). Having this right would mean I can instantly decline bad faith pending edits as soon as I see them. I have read and understood the relevant policies and guidelines relating to pending changes, vandalism and copyright. Beachweak (talk) 14:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Even if you're not pending changes reviewer, you can reject pending changes by reverting them. Pending changes reviewer, on the other hand, gives you the ability to accept changes. Rusty 🐈 14:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
I already know that, and the reason why im really requesting this is to accept pending changes and to reject them at the same time. (forgot to put the acceptance part) 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 03:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

I am an active editor with page creation review rights and over 5,000 edits to date. I try to keep my edits neutral and have a history of working with others on some contentious topics. If I make a mistake, I try to fix it and apologise as soon as possible. I have a good grasp of WP policy and MOS, and understand the difference between vandalism, tendentious editing and unconstructive editing. I've also got a very good grasp of copyright law (UK and US) and plagiarism due to my academic and professional background. Lewisguile (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request the pending changes reviewer right for the following reasons:

1. I am highly active in anti vandalism areas of the enwiki (AIV, RPP, etc, I even contributed to SPI) so I know what vandalism looks like when I see it.

2. I see a lot of constructive edits when I am on the "recent changes" section, that go unnoticed for quite a while. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

I was previously fairly active in anti-vandalism and am starting to do it again. I'd like to be granted this user right so that I can accept good edits to pending changes pages. Rusty 🐈 14:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:27, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

I believe this could help me out with the current vandalism fighting I do that may involve pages with pending changes. I have read WP:RCP, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's P&Gs. Mon Bhai edits Mon Bhai (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


Rollback

I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training on this page and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn to revert any vandalism seen on Special:RecentChanges. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).

Having the rollback permission would make RedWarn reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like Huggle. Could I have the right please? randomdude121 (leave a message!) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

I view that having this user right would help in fighting vandalism a lot faster. I know I would be far more efficient with fighting vandalism if I were to be granted Rollback. I have been editing for over 7 months, and I have well over 5140 edits, with a focus on mitigating abuse on the wiki. I am a frequent contributor to AIV and RPP. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting rollback rights to revert an edit by another user that merged Baroque Pinto with Friesian Sporthorse, without prior authorization or agreement, on 15 November 2024 - a higher-up editor or administrator previously denied a merge request due to "no consensus" in January 2024 - or allowing other users to discuss or dispute the page merge, as indicated for the procedure on Wikipedia: Merging. I have been trying to recover the Baroque Pinto page that was merged into Friesian Sporthorse without success, and need administrator assistance or intervention in order to revert or roll back the merge. Obversa (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You don't need rollback to revert one specific edit - see Help:Reverting. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello I'm a very sincere and careful Wikipedian, I mainly works on the fields of "stop vandalism", "find valuable resources for articles" and create ne articles.

 So, if I'll can access the rollback tool, then I working on YouTube more flowlessly and without any hardness.
                    -Thanking You! Malhar1234 (talk) 09:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I see no recent anti-vandalism actions in your contributions. And this is Wikipedia, not YouTube. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

I request rollback rights because I hate vandals and I want to get rid of them. Gnu779 (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 30 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot 12:50, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I don't think you're experienced enough for this yet. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I would like rollback so I can more efficiently fight obvious vandalism and I will use it responsibly and will always assume good faith. I have over 200 edits, but a few days under a month of reverting experience on recent changes, but please let that slide because it includes around 50 good quality reverts with pretty consistent and accurate warnings on talk pages. I only revert very obvious vandalism currently, and that's what I will do if granted with rollback, so I doubt I would suddenly decide to abuse my power if granted. Thanks for the consideration Fishy-Finns (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Footer

Policies and links