Loading
  • 21 Aug, 2019

  • By, Wikipedia

User Talk:Anomie

Pending changes protection history

Regarding your comment: editors are distrustful of proposals to try pending changes protection in new ways because the initial trial deployment didn't end on schedule. (The link in question was to the RfC that reached consensus to stop deployment (with as I recall, some exceptions like pending changes protection set by WMF staff as an office action).) I wrote up a longer explanation before realizing that you were editing during that time period, so you may recall the feelings of various editors from that time. isaacl (talk) 00:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And then a year later in another RFC people decided to start using it again. 🤷 In the later RFC I linked, people were opposing based on vague statements that it has "problems", nothing about it not being turned off right away at the end of the original trial. Anomie 02:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just saying that the linked RfC provided context of the historical distrust.
Regarding problems, pending changes has bugs, and there is no software development team currently up-to-speed on its implementation and thus readily able to fix them. As a result, some editors don't want to make pending changes more prominent in our processes, and aren't very hopeful about any enhancements. This is, however, a separate issue from the historical distrust. isaacl (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

October 14 (15 for some) 2024

Hello anomie, I’ve been considering making a doppelgänger account that I will use on Spanish Wikipedia. However I have edited on this account on Spanish Wikipedia. Do you think I should? I’ve just been looking through admins to ask in the admins list and found you.


Have a good day! Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 01:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Office politics?

Just curious, are you referring to any specific action by the WMF in your page header when you say "office politics", or are you just referring to its general conduct? To be clear, I'm by no means a supporter of the WMF, though I am glad they host this project. Thanks, /home/gracen/ (yell at me here) 22:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I worked for the WMF from 2012 until 2020. I don't know how much things have changed there since, but during that time they had several years of management trouble. First Lila and her mismanagement and purges, then Katherine and her people's focus on social justice issues rather than the software and wikis. I wound up being managed by someone who seemed to decide he could climb the management ladder with a kiss up kick down strategy, me being unable to play the office politics games made me a target, and no one who might have been in a position to stop it would do anything. On the up side, I heard that manager later tried targeting someone else and that time it seemed to backfire, he wound up doing the "go on leave for a few months and then leave" thing. Anomie 02:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to hear your experience working there was so bad. It upsets me that my love for Wikipedia as a project has to be contrasted with my (seemingly ever-growing) distaste for the WMF. Anyways, thanks for indulging my curiosity! Best, /home/gracen/ (yell at me here) 02:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive!

L.E. Rainer 20:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strike: The Ink Black Heart

Hi, are you aware of Strike? The next series, beginning on 16 December and entitled "The Ink Black Heart", features the detective trying to discover the real-life identity of somebody known on-line as Anomie. The BBC URL is https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0025ydg --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, never heard of it. I hope this doesn't become annoying, like "Homer to the Max". Anomie 23:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: They identified the perp. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 17:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Raph Williams65

Hey, Anomie

What can i do to get my bot, Raph65BOT, Approved?.

The bot was declined by you.

Raph Williams65 (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Raph Williams65: Bots may only be approved through a formal request at WP:BRFA. If you made a BRFA and it was declined, please do not appeal directly to individuals. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you can't manage to fill out the request correctly, you're unlikely to succeed in running a bot. Anomie 00:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I Can fill the request correctly. —Raph Williams65 (talk)

Merry Christmas!

Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Best of luck with all of your endeavours in the coming year, and enjoy the holiday! CR (talk) 10:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]