Thank you for making the style consistent at nanoimprint lithography. I did another pass, this time making everything lowercase, as that's the style on Wikipedia (see WP:MoS). Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the touch ups on the India Pakistan standoff page your a great editor

yours truly unknown ip —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.211.217 (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to put that date header. Mind if I move it above my edits? Yours will still be in chronological order. ——Mr. E. Sánchez / _{Share yours with me!} 01:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I don't mind. (Anonymi (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Thx! ——Mr. E. Sánchez / _{Share yours with me!} 01:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain, but I think that anon editor may have been attempting to comply with the request that I made on the talk page of the previous editor regarding the promotional tone of new material that was just added. Dppowell (talk) 04:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to this site were accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.148.5.120 (talk) 07:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC) I think it was pretty accurate. Have you seen This newspaper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.107.242 (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place to express your frustration with the newspaper. Be neutral and objective, and let the readers decide if the newspaper is evil. (Anonymi (talk) 08:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Am changing it back, the "lot of text removed" was imprecise and misleading (it made it seem as if it was a one time decision made by Army commanders rather than a power derived from statute; which it is.

Am changing it back. Will add more. 58.65.163.248 (talk) 07:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stated a reference. Interscope themselves said there will be no EP.

What I did was not vandalism and if you feel otherwise please discuss it with me. --24.1.205.187 (talk) 03:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that is so, please add that recent announcement as a note to the existing page; instead of blanking out rest of the page. And you might want to tag the page as an AfD. Deletion is a process, please don't blank out the page again. Thanks :) (Anonymi (talk) 03:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! PeterSymonds (talk) 09:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am writing to you because you have listed yourself as a member of the Electronics WikiProject. Sadly, this project is pretty dead, but I propose to resuscitate it with a collaboration. The idea is to have a concerted effort on improving one article per month, hopefully to GA or FA status and nominate the very best of them for the front page. I have prepared a page to control this process at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Collaboration (actually, I mostly shamelessly stole it from Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals where a collaboration of this sort was succesfully run). There you can make nominations for articles for collaboration or comment on the nominations of others.

If you want to take part you might like to place this template {{WikiProject Electronics Collaboration}} on your userpage which will give you a link to the current collaboration. If you are no longer interested in Wikiproject Electronics, please remove yourself from the members list, which is now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Members

Thanks for listening, SpinningSpark 17:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kirsten Gronfield has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Enfcer (talk) 08:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know how I missed that. I've referenced a TBS profile and I think it qualifies as a reliable source. Thanks for pointing it out though. (Anonymi (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Labrador Husky, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you are an electrical engineer. I am electrical engineer myself and I've proposed a new wikiproject, Electrical Engineering. Here is the link. I would like to ask your support. Please do participate in the discussion. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]