Thank you for the response at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback, now I don't really care that much if I don't get rollback rights. But I would kindly asked to not be too civil towards me, it can upset me. I have ASD and can get sensitive or upset easily. So unfortunately I had to remove your response. This wasn't because I was trying to make a personal attack, it was because I didn't like that response (not because you denied it, it was because the way you were talking to me. I would appreciate you re-adding it back, but please make it more polite. On the other hand, I have been using Twinkle to revert vandalism but doesn't work on notifying users on their talk page on advanced mobile edit, so please check the tags properly when checking the revisions or the user contributions. I do agree that I failed to notify users when reverting their edits but that time I thought I did but forgot to. I would appreciate you to re-add the response, but this time please make the response more polite and you can be a little bit civil, but not too much. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 11:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @PEPSI697: Hey, brother. Sorry to hear you have ASD, but the response Fastily gave you was perfectly normal and very polite. There was nothing wrong with it; they simply asked why you were failing to notify users when reverting someone’s edit. You should just explain the situation or say you forgot, and promise to notify users next time. That’s all, and the rest is in their hands. You can see this is the response Fastily gives to users who fails to notify others when reverting edits, and that’s not appropriate. I hope this clears things up, bro. Don’t take Fastily’s response as bad faith; I know him as one of the best admins here. I recommend that you self-revert your edit on the Rollback permission page and respond to Fastily’s question. That will help make the process smoother. Thanks, and happy editing! GrabUp - Talk 11:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! @Marchjuly has reverted the message I removed and restored it. I have repsonded to Fastily's answer. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 13:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @PEPSI697: While you're given a little leeway when it comes to removing posts made by othes from your user talk page per WP:BLANKING, you shouldn't be removing such posts from other talk pages or community pages per WP:TPO unless there's a really strong Wikipedia policy based reason for doing so. If you don't like what Fastily posted you can either discuss it with him and seek clarification, or you can seek the assistance of an administrator. I've re-added Fastily's comment, and I don't recommend you remove it again. If you truly feel otherwise, I suggest you seek administrator assistance instead of removing it yourself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Where specifically can I get administrative assistance? PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 13:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fastily: I don't want to have to make another topic again. But you are upsetting me with your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback and making me feel like I've been attacked or been aggressive towards me. I don't feel safe on Wikipedia at the moment. I feel like I've been treated like a bad faith editor. Please don't block me, I just got upset. I'm not trying to make personal attacks towards you, I just wanted to let you know. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 11:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are you hoping to achieve by coming here and continuing to complain? I'm literally not your therapist. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, you're not the only one who edits here. So yeah, you should expect to receive constructive criticism from time to time. If that's too much for you to handle, then it's high time for you to find a hobby that that doesn't involve Wikipedia. I know plenty of editors (admins included) who are on the spectrum but don't use their disability as an excuse to justify incompetence and/or bad behavior. Knock it off. -Fastily 22:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not complaining about anything, all I'm doing is just letting you know. I'm trying my best like you. I was not hoping to achieve anything. I know you're not my therapist. Can you please stop treating me like a bad faith contributor. I'm here for good faith. Can you please be civil towards me. I'm not upset because of the constructive criticism, I expected that is what would be the response. I'm not trying to make any personal attacks here or not complain about anything. So please don't block me. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 23:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Musiccomposersg contacted me about a deleted article draft. The message they received indicates it was deleted for WP:G11. The page log mentions WP:U5. Can you give us some background on what happened here and whether this material can be recovered and improved? ~Kvng (talk) 01:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kvng. This is a promotional/spam piece. Appreciate your AGF, but I don't think the author has the best intentions here. -Fastily 20:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I guess Wikipedia:Deletion review is their only option now. ~Kvng (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening @Fastily, do we have to make a deletion request to reset the sandbox and its history to create another topic that has nothing to do with it? Or is there a manipulation to be done? SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SparklingBlueMoon. I'm assuming you're referring to User:SparklingBlueMoon/sandbox. No, requesting deletion is optional, you can blank the sandbox if you so choose. -Fastily 00:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]