Deleting well referenced material as copyright violations is absolutely appalling.[1] Some of these "violations" are no more than one sentence!

This fanaticism by these "self-appointed [copyright] guardians"[2] makes any prolific editor a target.

If you're still picking yours up, I've sent you one.  pablo 20:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Okip. I note that you did some good work with the Article Incubator when it was first set up, but then you stopped. I'm looking into the incubator as concerns have been raised about it so I'd be interested to learn why you stopped being involved, yet carried on with WP:RESCUE. What do you feel are the essential differences between the Incubator and Rescue, and why do you prefer to continue with Rescue but not Incubator? SilkTork * 19:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He has retired. You don't see him around often, his visits very few and far between. Dream Focus 19:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I note he still does contribute now and again. SilkTork * 21:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bilateral relations task force Invitation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARSH1a has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 20:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARSB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A disagreement has arisen over which of two photos would be better as the main Infobox image for the Ben Templesmith article. Can you participate in this discussion? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikijoint has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm flattered that I could bring you out of retirement just to carry on the battle. FYI - The enormous collapsed table you added to the oppose section has broken the numbering in that section. You might want to take a look. SnottyWong  16:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Valued Contributor Award
	You have been identified as a valued contributor and your efforts are appreciated. We are honored to present you with the Valued Contributor Award and we thank you for donating your time, expertise and effort to Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. Thanks. (more details)

Ikip, I just wanted to ask you think about coming out of retirement. There are many people that greatly value the work that you have done on the project. I'll send you an email later and hope you'll read it. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (H₃O) 23:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Hydroxonium's talk page.

Dude, do it, or don't do it. You're not making yourself look too good by sporadically unretiring to pursue your long-term vendettas.  pablo 16:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I don't know you, but I just wanted to give some friendly advice that you might want to relax a bit with your edits to the ARS talk page. Your recent few edits seemed like they wouldn't do much but cause more drama, and came awfully close to uncivil personal attacks.

Best, Yaksar (let's chat) 23:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You whacked my comment, so I reverted you. Please take more care next time. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was too harsh, I apologize. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

For the record, I have no interest in all in getting you blocked, but I don't see why you keep trying to stop a productive discussion for personal grudges.--Yaksar (let's chat) 00:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy 4th of July! Thanks very much for your input the other day. Untill your intervention it felt like we only had a few valiant Seargents desperatly trying to hold the line without an officer class to lead them. FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		I am honored to award you this Barnstar for your work in catchig my typos and your valued assistace in bringing Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers to life for the community. It is hoped that newcomers will benefit for years to come. Schmidt, 05:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/Tab header/talk page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/Tab header/talk page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/Tab header/talk page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 09:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User 1000, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User 1000 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User 1000 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 21:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • 04:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/Auto-Upturn, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Auto-Upturn and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Auto-Upturn during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • 18:49, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/James Wharton, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/James Wharton and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/James Wharton during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 04:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/BF, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/BF and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/BF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/Alex Tweddle, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Further Ikip sub-pages and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Alex Tweddle during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 20:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Article Rescue Squadron/BLP/template, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Article Rescue Squadron/BLP/template and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Article Rescue Squadron/BLP/template during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • 20:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/Fair Online Network, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Fair Online Network and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Fair Online Network during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/Wesnoth AI, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Wesnoth AI and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Wesnoth AI during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 19:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas!
	Best wishes, Fleet Command (talk) 17:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rescue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Northamerica1000 04:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per section 3 of the guidelines when nominating a template for deletion/discussion, (Wikipedia:Templates for discussion), "it is considered civil to notify the creator and main contributors of the template that you are nominating the template." I simply notified a few users who contributed significantly to the template, per the revision history for the page— Located Here. User:Okip, you were a significant contributor to the template. There was no "canvassing", "selective canvassing", etc., and it is very inappropriate to insinuate such. I followed the instructions. Period. Northamerica1000 04:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Article Rescue Squadron/Wikipedia deletion sorting, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mtking 06:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A notification that the Templates for Discussion discussion (oy, repetition) has been taken to a deletion review discussion. The Article Rescue Squadron was notified, and as notifications to previous involved parties isn't normal practise, I and a few ARS members agreed that, in the interests of transparency and fairness, we should let everyone know...hence this talkpage message ;).

If anyone has an issue with me sending these out, do drop me a note on my talkpage. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/br, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/br and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/br during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you look over Wikipedia:Deletions and Openness and see what you think? I agree that civility is part of the problem, but I really think it will be easier to reverse this trend using software, rather than "excommunicating" the quality-control teams from the project. --HectorMoffet (talk) 08:02, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARS/Tagged has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:ARS/Tagged&action=history

{{tfd|ARS/Tagged}}
{|class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" style="float: right; width: 300px; margin: 0 0 0 1em;"
! style="background-color: #B5E1FF; border: 1px solid #FF1493;"| Articles tagged for<br />[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|deletion]] and [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|rescue]]
|-
| <categorytree mode=pages showcount=on>Articles tagged for deletion and rescue</categorytree>
|}
<noinclude>
Uses [[:Category:Articles tagged for deletion and rescue]].
</noinclude>

Coding if needed later. Okip 17:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Okip. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang 11:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kerry Committee report has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. (If you are the copyright holder, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material without verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Material copied from http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB2/storm.htm GabrielF (talk) 07:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am also going to bring the matter of your multiple socks to the admin's noticeboard. If you wish to respond to the thread there, you can do so on this talk page and me (or another editor) will copy your comments over. — Coren  15:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, Ikip/Okip, why you do this? I liked you as an editor. --Cyclopia 15:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was he blocked for evading a block with a multiple account or for malicious editing with a second account? A shame, he added some good content ツ Jenova20 16:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, he was not under any extant sanctions. The block is for participating in process (in particular, XfD) with multiple accounts which is not allowed since it compromises consensus. — Coren  16:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see. That's a shame as i found User:Dragdrag to be a competent and friendly contributor. Hopefully he will learn from this and come back with a spring in his step. Thanks ツ Jenova20 16:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Did he use more than one account at a time? Special:Contributions/Dragdrag shows he was active just one day there on 17 October 2012. Didn't he ask previously for his Wikipedia password to be scrambled since he was spending too much time on it? Where is the sockpuppet investigation at? He didn't seem to be using his main account much at all that year Special:Contributions/Okip and not on the same day or same areas that this other account was at. Dream Focus 20:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alternating between abusive socks on different days is still socking, and pretending to be different editors to game the system is still dishonest. Doing so with multiple socks over years is... well, let's just say that the current AN thread isn't heading in an "unblock" direction. — Coren  20:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Per the current consensus at WP:AN, I've extended this block to indefinite. That doesn't necessarily mean permanent, so keep the conditions of WP:OFFER in mind. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You really ought not to have extended the block before the discussion was closed. No need as it still had weeks to run. Make's it look like the perma ban is a fait accompli. Appalling way to treat such a legendary editor as Okip. FeydHuxtable (talk)

Well, I agree an indef block looks more punitive than anything else (after all, how is an account block going to prevent socking?) but years of socking used to sway consensus are a very, very serious infraction. I hope Okip gets it and accepts a WP:OFFER. --Cyclopia 22:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't "years of socking used to sway consensus". He had three sock accounts, one he just started last month, another he used for one day in the month before his latest one was created, and another that hasn't been used since 2009. If he had used any of them at the same time, then it would be a serious problem. Are we punishing him for something done over three years ago, or one of the more recent minor things? Indef ban seems rather harsh either way. Dream Focus 23:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I try not to reason in "friends vs foes" terms. I felt close to Okip as an editor, still socking is a very big no-no in my book. Also socking is a stupid thing to do, given that sooner or later, especially if you use it in controversial debates, you are going to be caught, and put yourself in deeper trouble. --Cyclopia 09:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okip - I personally am very sorry to see the outcome here, but after discussion at AN here, it seems pretty obvious that the community has decided you need to take a break for a while. I strongly encourage you to read over the Wikipedia:Standard offer and plan on returning in the not too distant future. I've seen you do some wonderful things for the both ARS, and Wikipedia in general, and hope you'll weather this bump in the road. Best of luck to you in all. — Ched :  ?  21:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Ched, wholeheartedly. Hope to see you back soon -you did mistakes, but you can show you're a great editor again --Cyclopia 21:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think its a block not a ban, small comfort I know but most people are arguing for a long break not a ban. Spartaz 02:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/jackminor, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/jackminor and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/jackminor during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A number of pages that you substantially contributed to, have been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Subpages of retired User Okip and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of the subpages of retired User Okip during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Illia Connell (talk) 22:55, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Administration notice Board. Since you had some involvement with the Administration notice Board redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). _→AzaToth 21:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Bilateral relations small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 04:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bilateral relations task force Invitation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. And Adoil Descended (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARSS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARSS/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Soatech has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikip/Discussion about creation of possible Wikiproject:New Users and BLPs, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Discussion about creation of possible Wikiproject:New Users and BLPs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Discussion about creation of possible Wikiproject:New Users and BLPs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Database error. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Database error redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Help:Rich text editor. Since you had some involvement with the Help:Rich text editor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NPA1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 05:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NPA1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 16:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Egyptian mummy" ca.1898. Since you had some involvement with the "Egyptian mummy" ca.1898 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — PinkAmpers& 02:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Is the Holocaust Unique? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is the Holocaust Unique? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JudeccaXIII (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AbUS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 00:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Add cite.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:CONTEST has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 29 § Wikipedia:CONTEST until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 15:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:Contest has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 29 § Wikipedia:Contest until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 15:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]