If you have any questions or concerns/criticism regarding my edits, or if you just want to chat, then you are at the right place! With that said though, please be civil when leaving a message on my talkpage. I will then respond to you from here in a timely manner. Thanks! SkyFlyFive

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User_talk:Donner60— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mistake. This was a Huggle thing, I guess. I was trying to revert the vandalism to my talk page that you were trying to revert. I am not sure how this happened but I apologize for the mistake and thank you for the vandalism reversion. Donner60 (talk) 02:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Donner60: No worries :-) SkyFlyFive 02:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

so how do I write stuff about living ppl? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:FC41:8500:7419:2EB4:8963:10DC (talk) 03:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@2605:A000:FC41:8500:7419:2EB4:8963:10DC: The source that you included in your edit did mention Reema, however, Pinterest probably isn't the best source to use, especially in dealing with BLP (Biographies of Living Persons). The best sources to use in referencing content are generally neutral websites (so not Pinterest). After doing a google search, I saw this article, which is pretty straight forward in comparison to Pinterest. I've gone ahead and re-added this in to the Adam Saleh article for you. Cheers! SkyFlyFive 03:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

www.famousbirthdays.com doesn't exhibit the characteristics of a reliable source, so probably shouldn't be referenced. See this discussion at the reliable source noticeboard. Moreover, the documentation for {{Infobox person}} says to include relatives "only if independently notable or particularly relevant", which usually means they are discussed at length in the article on the person or have their own article. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

.. but thank you anyway for your edits and your work on UAA. Optakeover 04:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Optakeover: No problem. :-) By the way, I posted the WP:UAA template on your recent WP:AIV report just as a point of reference. The only thing that matters is if the admins actually see the report, overall. Cheers! SkyFlyFive 04:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It depends. Just to be sure I'll report the user to UAA now. Cheers, Optakeover 04:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]