Whittington's Longhouse
The Longhouse, though it was not London's first public toilet, was the first public toilet in the capital with separate provision for the sexes.
The Longhouse, and the similarly financed almshouse for five or six parishioners constructed above it, was built by the parish of St Martin Vintry, on a long dock over the Thames. It was on Walbrook Street, at the time an actual brook, approximately where the modern Bell Wharf Lane is, and was "flushed by the Thames". The waste was deposited in a gully which was washed by the tides twice a day – the Thames being tidal there.
Rexroth in his 2007 book Deviance and Power in Late Medieval London argues that with the construction of the almshouse above the privies: "pauperes were assigned new households" where shame had been banished (due to the gender segregation). By the seventeenth century the almshouse was being let on a commercial basis, possibly even as warehousing.
The Longhouse was destroyed in the Great Fire of London and rebuilt on a more modest scale. The new building had six male and six female seats, and, apart from a period where the lessees kept it locked, continued in use until at least 1851, as it is mentioned in an 80-year lease that commenced that year. In a 1935 lease, however, no mention is made, and it is assumed the facilities were by that time closed. After the Second World War, the site was rebuilt in 1953 as part of "Redevelopment unit number 10". There is, however, as of 2015, a Bell Wharf Lane public toilet.
The Longhouse and the other gifts to London, notably improvements to the water supply and a more substantial almshouse as well as schools and hospitals, are credited with raising the profile of Dick Whittington among Londoners, and for leading to the legends that surround his name. Longhouse became a byword for privy, presumably derived from Whittington's Longhouse.
References
- ^ Mark Ravenhill (28 November 2006). "Confessions of a panto-lover". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
- ^ Peter de Loriol (2013). The London Book of Days. The History Press. p. May 1st. ISBN 9780752492438.
- ^ Mary Anne Case. "Why not abolish the laws of urinary segregation?". Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing (PDF). Harvey Molotch and Laura Norén (editors). New York University Press. p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
- ^ Frank Rexroth (2007). Deviance and Power in Late Medieval London. Past and Present Publications. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521847308. ISSN 1754-792X.
- ^ Terje Oestigaard (2006). "Water Control and River Biographies". A History of Water. Vol. I. Terje Tvedt, Eva Jakobsson, Richard Coopey (editors). London and New York: I. B. Tauris. p. 309. ISBN 9781850434450.
- ^ Lucy Worsley (2011). If Walls Could Talk: An intimate history of the home. Faber & Faber. p. 154. ISBN 9780571259533.
- ^ John Richardson (2000). The Annals of London: A Year-by-year Record of a Thousand Years of History. University of California Press. p. 62. ISBN 9780520227958.
- ^ "A Medieval Public Convenience". Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
- ^ "List of papers presented to the Guildhall Historical Association from 1944 to the present" (PDF). Guildhall Historical Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
- ^ P. E. Jones Whittington's Longhouse, London Topographical Record, 23, 1972. Pages 27–34.
Further reading
- P. E. Jones Whittington's Longhouse, London Topographical Record, Volume 23, 1972. Pages 27–34.
- Ernest L. Sabine (July 1934). "Latrines and Cesspools of Medieval London". Speculum. 9 (3). The Medieval Academy of America: 307–9. doi:10.2307/2853898. JSTOR 2853898.