1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50

---

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Wugapodes (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Life has slowed down and I have more time to volunteer. Poking around WP:RM, it turns out that non-trivial page moves are hard even with page mover. Instead of making extra work for myself and others, I'd like the tools back. Link to resignation for convenience. — Wug·a·po·des 00:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Admin action exactly a year ago, so well within the five year rule. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:35, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Standard 24h hold in place, though I do not see any difficulties here. Primefac (talk) 08:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. 28bytes (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A monumental good thing. Glad to see these permissions renewed. BusterD (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following inactive administrators can be desysoped due to inactivity. Thank you for your service.

Criteria 1 (total inactivity)

none

Criteria 2 (100 edits/5-year rule)

1. Lethe (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
2. Jarry1250 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Graham87 (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, not listed by Xaos! Can't say I've seen that before. charlotte 07:45, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It last happened in October last year. Before Xaosflux became a bureaucrat, I used to regularly post these notifications; before then, Moe Epsilon did so. Graham87 (talk) 09:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do go offline sometimes! — xaosflux 11:00, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jarry1250 is a reasonably active bot maintainer; it feels wrong to classify them as "inactive". —Kusma (talk) 07:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I remember this user fondly too, but they did make fewer than 100 edits in five years ... Graham87 (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not questioning that the policy applies here (it clearly does), I am just trying to point out that there are ways to be active that do not manifest themselves as edits. —Kusma (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Removed. Primefac (talk) 08:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Graham87 (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]