• SecondLooneyaccount (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 )
• In July 2021, DanCherek warned this user about the addition of copyrighted content to Draft:The Fairly OddParents (2022 TV series), though the draft has been deleted and Dan's message did not specify what the violation entailed. In January 2022, Onel5969 nominated List of Nailed It! episodes for speedy deletion under criterion G12 for copying episode descriptions from Netflix. This user accepted that the descriptions were copied, agreeing to remove them to avoid speedy deletion. In July 2023, Belbury reverted this user's attempt to change the infobox image at High School Musical: The Musical: The Series season 4 to an unlicensed image, which has since been deleted. While New Page Patrolling today, I found that the lead sections of Step Class (Abbott Elementary) and Open House (Abbott Elementary) were both copied by this user in late April 2024 from the official episode descriptions found on Hulu and Rotten Tomatoes and am writing unique replacements. This user has also been warned against copying text from other Wikipedia pages without edit summary attribution in November 2021 and February 2022, and uploaded File:Schitts Creek S1poster.jpg, File:Schitts Creek S2poster.jpg, File:Schitts Creek S3poster.jpg, and File:Schitts Creek S6poster.jpg without a non-free media use rationale (ultimately provided by Salavat). I am raising this case because the documented instances of copyright infringement have occurred over a multi-year span and the user is still active. BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 17:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ramblersen2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by Fram (talk)
• The autopatrolled editor has more than 100,000 edits across their accounts (User:Ramblersen was the first). They have received some copyvio warnings over the years, the most recent one in January 2022 from user:Diannaa. Their copyright violations seem to have remained undetected because they were translations, which don't get picked up by our tools. I removed a partial copyvio from their most recent contribution Arnold Eugen Reimann (landowner), and upon further checking found (next to instances of close paraphrasing) blatant copyvios in other very recent contributions like The Iron Foundry, Burmeister & Wain and Kronborg Tapestries, which I nominated for speedy deletion. But as copyright violations also seemed to appear further down his list of contributions (e.g. in Simon Aron Eibeschütz, the "Personal life and legacy" section, is in parts identical to the text of the source[1]) a CCI seemed the way to go. I also would suggest that their Autopatrolled right should be revoked, because of the copyvios and because of very sloppy writing (highlighted in my comments on their talk page as well). Fram (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) Fram (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I checked further, and the copyvios seem to be going back a long time, judging from Johan Daniel Herholdt (physician) from December 2023 which has a long literal copy of the Google translated version of the source. Fram (talk) 11:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mladifilozof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk)
• 3 notifications in 2023 from Diannaa about copyright violations, and Hilst nominated Cobrinha Verde for a G12 deletion earlier this year. (I have no idea when the article was created). I found these two edits [2] [3] from 2010 that both blatantly copy-pasted material from [4]. Also found [[5]], that closely paraphrased the cited book.

Hardly an urgent request, given that the contributor hasn't edited since Oct. 2023, and they did seem to get better after being warned. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Vaoverland (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by Mackensen (talk)
• Vaoverland was a prolific user in the early days of Wikipedia. He passed away in 2011. Investigation has identified five articles created in 2004 which were substantially copyright violations from the moment of creation:

• Chesapeake and Ohio Railway: copied from this page from the Chesapeake and Ohio Historical Society
• Florida East Coast Railway: copied from this page from the Flagler Museum.
• Southern Railway (U.S.): copied from this page from the Southern Railway Historical Association.

• DrOrinScrivello (talk · contribs) has identified two others (Sewell's Point and Battle of Hampton Roads) and I'll let them supply the details. Mackensen (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As Mackensen mentioned, Sewell's Point has a large section copied from this page (Vaoverland's initial version, which is still visible in the page history, was copied from other sites as well, but most has been gradually removed from the article over time), and Battle of Hampton Roads is largely copied from this site. These are just two that I found in some quick searching; unfortunately the user was quite prolific around this time, so I'm worried there's much more. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upon further inspection, it looks like Battle of Hampton Roads is a false positive; that page copied from us. Also, I did some more looking at Vaoverland's contributions after those mentioned above, and I'm less sure that there's a persistent issue. I'll let someone more experienced in these matters than me decide, however. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Deisenbe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by MER-C
• Editor has received multiple copyright warnings on their talk page, some handwritten (e.g. [6][7], note some other instances have had permission cleared). After investigating another matter, I came across [8], which was copied from https://eu.tallahassee.com/story/news/2014/02/05/neamathla-led-tribe-near-lake-lafayette/5218971/. I am concerned that there is more lurking in their 76000+ edits. MER-C 18:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I haave 76,000 edits. There have been a few mistakes. This measure is intended for "large-scale systematic copyright violations only". My violations are neither large-scale nor systematic. deisenbe (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Selfstudier (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk)
• User has been warned several times by multiple users for copyright violations([9][10][11][12][13][14]) and copying from compatibly licensed sources/CWW without attribution([15][16]). To their credit, they have gotten a lot better at attribution with respect to CWW issues.

Violations that I have found today, after spot checking ten of their recent contributions:

• [17] contains text copied from [18]
• [19] contains text copied from [20]
• [21] contains text copied from [22]
• [23] contains text copied from [24], but you can just look at the quote they included in the ref.
• [25] contains text copied from [26] GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed 3 of those vios above, the other 2 are not in the articles anymore afaics.

Re the warnings, 4 of them are between 2018 and 2020, the fifth was mistaken, the material was in quotes with inline attribution and the person giving the warning reverted it, which I then restored and subsequently instead the editor changed his complaint to one of the quote being too long, which I don't think it was. Just the usual back and forth editing for an ongoing current event.

That leaves the recent June warning, which I confess was a screwup on my part. If you look back in 2023, I was editing this article frequently from the same source (periodic UN OCHA updates) with no problems and then the Gaza war intervened so I stopped doing that. Then in June, OCHA resumed reporting as it had done previously but with some format and other changes so I thought to resume editing as previously. What I was intending to do was to copy the relevant material out to the article and then use it like a sandbox (I know, bad...) to get the new information into the same way I was doing it in 2023. My mistake, won't happen again. Selfstudier (talk) 17:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• P.Karthik.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
• Check requested by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk)
• Mostly copvios of official plot premises/advertisements. One CWW warning from Diannaa from last year, Special:Diff/1168291235
• [27] from [28]
• [29] from [30] or similar
• [31] from [32]
• [33] from [34] GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]