Wikipedia:NMFD
Creating and editing drafts
Anyone, including users who are not logged in, can create and edit drafts. Drafts have "Draft:" before their normal title, and also have an associated draft talk page. Users who have VisualEditor enabled will be able to use VisualEditor just like on articles. Changing a page from a draft to an article requires an autoconfirmed account (an account with at least 10 edits and created at least 4 days ago). Doing so is done by moving the page to a title without "Draft:" in front of it. If there is a technical barrier to the move, such as when the creation of an article may be protected, seek assistance at places such as the Teahouse, the technical moves page, or the request for unprotection page.
Create a new draft
|
After you have created your draft page:
- (Optionally) add the template {{Draft article}} at the top of the draft (not the talk page), along with the template's parameters
|name
and|subject=
. A list of appropriate subject fields can be found here. If the draft name has a redirect page of the same name, you can use {{R with possibilities}}.
- Disable any categories by inserting a colon before the word "Category", e.g. change
[[Category:Living people]]
to[[:Category:Living people]]
, or by using the {{Draft categories}} template. - Non-free content cannot be included in draft articles, per Wikipedia's policy on where non-free media is allowed. Any desired non-free content should be added to the article once it has been moved to the mainspace.
Finding drafts
Drafts are not indexed by most search engines including Google, meaning most readers will not find them. Anyone can search and view drafts on Wikipedia directly using Wikipedia's built-in search engine: simply choose "Advanced", then tick "Draft" and/or "Draft talk" on the list of options (i.e. in this manner). The list of all draft pages is at Special:AllPages or Special:PrefixIndex. You can also view recent Draft changes to the namespace, newly created drafts, visit a random draft, or see Wikipedia:AfC sorting. Some drafts are sorted by subtopic under Category:Draft articles.
As the draft namespace is a common location for incubating articles (unlike user space), users are notified through Template:New page DYM when visiting a non-existent article whose title does exist in draft space, to prevent unnecessary creation of duplicates on current events, and to help editors discover abandoned drafts to take over and save time rather than starting from scratch:
The warning is also invoked by Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Main for existing mainspace pages.
There is a draft of this article at Draft:Example.
Moving drafts to mainspace
Putting the article in the main namespace (where normal articles are) requires an editor to use the page move function to move it into the Main (article) namespace. This means that anonymous editors, or registered editors who are not autoconfirmed, will need to request help with this step by inserting into their drafts the relevant template for requesting a page move. Optionally, editors can also submit drafts for review via the articles for creation process by adding the code {{subst:submit}}
to the top of the draft page.
An article created in draftspace does not belong to the editor who created it, and any other user may edit, move, rename, redirect, merge, or seek deletion of any draft.
Moving articles to draftspace
The aim of moving an article to draft is to allow time and space for the draft's improvement until it is acceptable for mainspace. It is not intended as a backdoor route to deletion.
After moving an article to draft space, you should:
- Nominate the resulting cross-namespace redirect for deletion using {{db-r2}} (administrators and page movers can skip this by moving without leaving a redirect)
- Notify the creator of the article (e.g. with {{uw-articletodraft}})
- Mark its talk page with the tags of any relevant projects as a means of soliciting improvements from interested editors
The process can be automated with the MoveToDraft user script.
Reasons to move an article to draftspace
Common reasons for incubating an article to draftspace as an alternative to deletion include, but are not limited to:
- The article was created by an editor who appears to have a conflict of interest, but it did not go through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process
- The article consists of machine-generated text, such as an unedited machine translation or the output of a large language model
- The article is about an upcoming event or forthcoming work that is not notable yet, but likely to become so in the near future
Reasons not to move an article to draftspace
Editors should generally avoid moving an article to draftspace in the following circumstances:
- The article was created more than 90 days ago
- The article is currently being discussed at articles for deletion (AfD), deletion review (DRV), or a similar venue where the move could pre-empt a formal close
- The article contains outstanding copyright violations; these are not allowed in any namespace and must be addressed
- There is no chance that the article can be improved to the point that is suitable for mainspace; problems that can't be fixed are reasons for deletion
- Another editor is actively working on the article, e.g. there is an {{under construction}} notice or there have been constructive edits made within the last hour
- Another editor has asserted that the page belongs in mainspace, e.g. it has previously been moved there, or there is a clear statement to that effect in the edit history or on the talk page
- Another editor has objected to or reversed the move
As a result of a deletion discussion
Articles may be moved to become a draft as a result of a deletion discussion, indirectly following deletion and a request for undeletion. When performing such a move, link to the original deletion discussion and the decision to move the article into draftspace. Authors should try to understand and respond to the reason for moving to draft status, and then use the AfC submission process to have the page moved back to mainspace. The author is encouraged to ask other editors questions, or to use the {{Help me}} template.
Objections
Moving an article to draftspace, like any action, requires consensus. It may initially be carried out as a bold move if there is a reasonable expectation that doing so is uncontroversial. But if another editor—including the creator of the page—objects to the move (for example by moving the page back to mainspace), then it is not uncontroversial. In these circumstances, refrain from further moves until a consensus on the appropriate namespace has been established on the article's talk page, at articles for deletion, or another suitable venue. This means that an article should only be unilaterally moved to draftspace a single time.
An exception is articles created by an editor with a conflict of interest. These must be created via AfC and the page may be moved to enforce this requirement regardless of any objections from the creator (but not other, neutral editors).
Deleting drafts
Drafts are meant to be works in progress, and most will not meet Wikipedia's standards for quality at first. This means that drafts are not subject to the same deletion criteria as articles, such as "no context", "no indication of importance", or "not in English". Creators should be allowed time to e.g. establish context or notability, translate, and make other adjustments and improvements (though abandoned drafts will be deleted after six months).
Speedy deletion
The general section of the criteria for speedy deletion may be applied to drafts. Drafts that are copyright violations, vandalism, disparage or attack their subject, are tests, or unambiguous advertising or promotion can be speedily deleted.
Abandoned drafts
Drafts that have not been edited in six months may be deleted under criterion for speedy deletion G13. Most G13 nominations for deletion are done by bots or users using Twinkle or AFCH, processes that inform the draft creator on their talk page. Pages deleted under G13 may be restored upon request at WP:REFUND (see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13).
Drafts may be tagged with {{promising draft}} by an editor other than the original draft creator, if they feel that a draft is promising. This tag cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a G13 speedy deletion nomination, but extra attention should be directed to determining the viability of a draft bearing this notice before seeking to delete it.
Miscellany for deletion
Drafts that do not meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion can still be nominated for deletion at miscellany for deletion (MfD). A draft will be deleted at MfD if there is a consensus that it meets one of the reasons for deletion under the deletion policy and that it is unlikely to ever be a viable article. Failure to demonstrate that the topic meets notability guidelines is not considered sufficient reason to delete a draft, unless it has been repeatedly declined and resubmitted at AfC without improvement.
Redirects from drafts moved to mainspace
Redirects that are a result of page moves from the draft namespace to the main namespace should be retained.
See also
- Request for Comment for the new namespace on the Village pump (proposals)
- Wikipedia:Do not use draftspace, an essay
- Wikipedia:Mbabel - article draft generating tool for Wikipedia based on Wikidata
- Wikipedia:Workpages
- Wikipedia:Article wizard
Notes
- ^ Including disambiguation pages; very rarely, new pages for non-article namespaces such as the Portal:, Template: and Wikipedia: namespaces are first incubated in the draftspace.
- ^ After six months have elapsed since its last substantive edit, the draft becomes eligible for deletion. See § Deletion of old drafts.
- ^ Search engines or mirrors that do not respect the robots.txt convention might still index drafts.
- ^ Wikipedia's editing policy applies to all pages, including drafts.
- ^ Editors with a conflict of interest are asked to use AfC in Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § COI editing and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § Paid editing.
- ^ RFC at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Proposal to ban draftifying articles more than 90 days old without consensus.
- ^ Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion § Wikietiquette,
[w]hile there is no prohibition against moving an article while an AfD or deletion review discussion is in progress, editors considering doing so should realize such a move can confuse the discussion greatly, can preempt a closing decision, can make the discussion difficult to track, and can lead to inconsistencies when using semi-automated closing scripts.
- ^ Moving an article over the objections of another editor, without seeking consensus, constitutes edit warring (more specifically move warring)
- ^ This RfC determined through community consensus that Template:Promising draft cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a G13 speedy nomination, superseding a previous discussion.
- ^ Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 149 § RfC: Deletion of drafts
- ^ Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58 § RfC: Does WP:N apply to drafts in userspace or draftspace?
- ^ It was determined that the community consensus in this RfC regarding draft namespace redirects amounted to "there is a clear consensus against deletion of draft namespace redirects. There is a rough consensus against the alternative proposal to delete draft namespace redirects after six months."
- ^ Walling, Steven (20 December 2013). "New draft feature provides a gentler start for Wikipedia articles". Diff. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
Learn more
- See the technical requirements and future development ideas on MediaWiki.org