The High Court of Bombay is the high court of the states of Maharashtra and Goa in India, and the union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. It is seated primarily at Mumbai (formerly known as Bombay), and is one of the oldest high courts in India. The High Court has circuit benches at Nagpur and Aurangabad in Maharashtra and Porvorim,

The first Chief Justice, the Attorney General and the Solicitor General of Independent India were from this court. Since India's Independence, 22 judges from this court have been elevated to the Supreme Court and 8 have been appointed to the office of Chief Justice of India.

The court has Original Jurisdiction in addition to its Appellate. Judgments issued by this court can be appealed only to the Supreme Court of India. The Bombay High Court has a sanctioned strength of 94 judges (71 permanent, 23 additional). The building is part of The Victorian and Art Deco Ensemble of Mumbai, which was added to the list of World Heritage Sites in 2018.

As of 2022, the Court is currently understaffed, with only 57 judges as against the permitted number of 96 judges.

The Bombay High Court was one of the three High Courts in India established at the Presidency Towns by Letters patent granted by Queen Victoria, bearing date 26 June 1862. It was inaugurated on 14 August 1862 under the High Courts Act, 1861.

The work on the present building of the High Court was commenced in April 1871 and completed in November 1878. It was designed by British engineer Col. James A. Fuller. The first sitting in this building was on 10 January 1879. Justice M. C. Chagla was the first Indian permanent Chief Justice of Bombay High Court after independence [1948 – 1958] Architecture: Gothic revival in the Early English style. It is 562 feet (171 m) long and 187 feet (57 m) wide. To the west of the central tower are two octagonal towers. The statues of Justice and Mercy are atop this building.

In 2016, it was announced that the premises of the Bombay High Court would be shifting to Bandra Kurla Complex.

The 125th anniversary of the building was marked by the release of a book, commissioned by the Bar Association, called "The Bombay High Court: The Story of the Building – 1878–2003" by local historians Rahul Mehrotra and Sharada Dwivedi.

Although the name of the city was changed from Bombay to Mumbai in 1995, the Court as an institution did not follow suit and retained the name Bombay High Court. Although, a bill to rename it as Mumbai High Court was approved by the Union Cabinet on 5 July 2016, along with the change of name of the Calcutta High Court and Madras High Court as Kolkata High Court and Chennai High Court respectively, the same is pending approval before the Parliament of India but may not be enacted for some time.

In 2010, the High Court organized several functions to mark the completion of 150 years of the establishment of the High Court. A special postal cover was released by Milind Deora, the then Minister of State for Communications and Information Technology at the historical Central Court Hall of the High Court on 14 August 2012.

An exhibition displaying important artifacts, royal charters, stamps, old maps and other documents of historical importance was inaugurated by the then Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Prithviraj Chavan, in the Central Court Hall on 15 August 2012. The then Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh was the Chief Guest at the concluding ceremony of the year-long Sesquicentennial celebrations on 18 August 2012.

A book titled A Heritage of Judging: The Bombay High Court through one hundred and fifty years, edited by Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Anoop V. Mohta and Roshan S. Dalvi was published by the Maharashtra Judicial Academy.

In its illustrious history, the Bombay High Court has been the site for numerous noteworthy trials and court cases. Bal Gangadhar Tilak was tried a number of times in the Bombay High Court, but the most famous was his trial for sedition in the 1916 case Emperor v. Bal Gangadhar Tilak.

Bar Council had boycotted some judges of the High Court in 1991 under the leadership of Senior Counsel Iqbal Chagla. In 2011, a couple of petitions came to be filed challenging housing societies built by judges upon plots of land reserved for other purposes.

In November 2021, the Bombay High Court issued a controversial criminal case against AstraZeneca for misinformation and misleading claims regarding the safety of their vaccines. The suit claims this misinformation is responsible for the death of the afflicted. Some rumors appeared that the suit was against Bill Gates for partial funding of AstraZeneca, but these rumors were fake. The suit is addressed to both The State of Maharashtra and AstraZeneca.

The Bombay High Court sits at Mumbai, the capital of the state of Maharashtra, and has additional benches in Aurangabad and Nagpur in Maharashtra, as well as Panaji in the state of Goa. It may have a maximum of 94 judges, of which 71 must be permanently appointed and 23 may be additionally appointed. Currently, it has a total of 67 Judges.

#	Judge	Date of joining	Date of retirement
1	Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya (CJ)	21 November 2011	15 June 2027
2	Atul Sharachchandra Chandurkar	21 June 2013	6 April 2027
3	Revati Prashant Mohite Dere	21 June 2013	16 April 2027
4	Mahesh Sharadchandra Sonak	21 June 2013	27 November 2026
5	Ravindra Vithalrao Ghuge	21 June 2013	8 July 2028
6	Ajey Shrikant Gadkari	6 January 2014	13 June 2027
7	Nitin Wasudeo Sambre	6 January 2014	18 December 2029
8	Girish Sharadchandra Kulkarni	6 January 2014	23 June 2030
9	Burgess Pesi Colabawalla	6 January 2014	15 December 2029
10	Makarand Subhash Karnik	17 March 2016	9 February 2031
11	Bharati Harish Dangre	5 June 2017	9 May 2030
12	Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal	5 June 2017	12 April 2030
13	Riyaz Iqbal Chagla	5 June 2017	21 October 2031
14	Manish Pitale	5 June 2017	10 September 2032
15	Mangesh Shivajirao Patil	5 June 2017	26 July 2025
16	Prithviraj Keshavrao Chavan	5 June 2017	21 February 2025
17	Vibha Vasant Kankanwadi	5 June 2017	23 June 2026
18	Shriram Madhusudan Modak	11 October 2018	12 November 2027
19	Nijamoddin Jahiroddin Jamadar	11 October 2018	21 September 2034
20	Rajendra Govind Avachat	11 October 2018	14 March 2026
21	Avinash Gunwant Gharote	23 August 2019	16 May 2025
22	Nitin Bhagawantrao Suryawanshi	23 August 2019	29 May 2028
23	Anil Satyavijay Kilor	23 August 2019	2 September 2028
24	Milind Narendra Jadhav	23 August 2019	13 August 2031
25	Mukulika Shrikant Jawalkar	5 December 2019	25 May 2026
26	Nitin Rudrasen Borkar	5 December 2019	1 August 2033
27	Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar	7 January 2020	12 January 2029
28	Amit Bhalchandra Borkar	7 January 2020	1 January 2034
29	Abhay Ahuja	4 March 2020	23 August 2031
30	Rajesh Narayandas Laddha	25 June 2021	26 April 2026
31	Sanjay Ganpatrao Mehare	25 June 2021	22 March 2025
32	Govinda Ananda Sanap	25 June 2021	23 February 2025
33	Shivkumar Ganpatrao Dige	25 June 2021	2 August 2033
34	Anil Laxman Pansare	21 October 2021	13 November 2027
35	Sandipkumar Chandrabhan More	21 October 2021	6 April 2028
36	Urmila Sachin Joshi-Phalke	6 June 2022	14 April 2030
37	Kishore Chandrakant Sant	19 July 2022	6 October 2029
38	Valmiki SA Menezes	19 July 2022	28 July 2029
39	Kamal Rashmi Khata	19 July 2022	25 November 2031
40	Sharmila Uttamrao Deshmukh	19 July 2022	27 February 2030
41	Arun Ramnath Pedneker	19 July 2022	23 June 2033
42	Sandeep Vishnupant Marne	19 July 2022	8 December 2035
43	Gauri Vinod Godse	19 July 2022	7 October 2034
44	Rajesh Shantaram Patil	19 July 2022	20 July 2031
45	Arif Saleh Doctor	19 July 2022	16 July 2034
46	Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade	7 October 2022	8 May 2028
47	Mahendra Wadhumal Chandwani	7 October 2022	23 May 2033
48	Abhay Sopanrao Waghwase	7 October 2022	9 December 2028
49	Ravindra Madhusudan Joshi	7 October 2022	28 September 2029
50	Santosh Govindrao Chapalgaonkar	30 November 2022	3 March 2035
51	Milind Manohar Sathaye	30 November 2022	5 September 2036
52	Neela Kedar Gokhale	30 January 2023	2 May 2031
	Vacant

#	Judge	Date of joining
1	Sanjay Anandrao Deshmukh	7 October 2022
2	Vrushali Vijay Joshi	7 October 2022
3	Shailesh Pramod Brahme	15 June 2023
4	Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla	15 June 2023
5	Jitendra Shantilal Jain	15 June 2023
6	Manjusha Ajay Deshpande	11 August 2023
7	Abhay Jainarayanji Mantri	21 October 2023
8	Shyam Chhaganlal Chandak	21 October 2023
9	Neeraj Pradeep Dhote	21 October 2023
10	Somasekhar Sundaresan	28 November 2023
11	Nivedita Prakash Mehta	25 October 2024
12	Prafulla Surendrakumar Khubalkar	25 October 2024
13	Ashwin Damodar Bhobe	25 October 2024
14	Rohit Wasudeo Joshi	25 October 2024
15	Advait Mahendra Sethna	25 October 2024
	Vacant

#	Chief Justice	Tenure		Governor (Oathed By)
		Start	Finish
1	Sir Mathew Richard Sausse	1862	1866
2	Sir Richard Couch	1866	1870
3	Sir Michael Roberts Westropp	1870	1882
4	Sir Charles Sargent	1882	1895
5	Sir Charles Frederick Farran	1895	1898
6	Sir Louis Addin Kershaw	1898	1899
7	Sir Lawrence Hugh Jenkins	1899	1908
8	Sir Basil Scott	1908	1919
9	Sir Norman Cranstoun Macleod	1919	1926
10	Sir Amberson Barrington Marten	1926	1930
11	Sir John William Fisher Beaumont	1930	1943
12	Sir Leonard Stone	1943	1947	John Colville
After Independence
12	Sir Leonard Stone	1947	1948	John Colville
13	Mahommedali Currim Chagla	1948	1958	Raja Sir Maharaj Singh
14	Hashmatrai Khubchand Chainani	1958	1965	Sri Prakasa
15	Yeshwant Shripad Tambe	1965	4 February 1966
		5 February 1966	31 July 1966	Dr P V Cherian
16	Sohrab Peshotan Kotval	1 August 1966	26 September 1972
17	K. Kalyandas Desai	27 September 1972	26 October 1972
18	Ramanlal Maneklal Kantawala	27 October 1972	5 October 1978	Ali Yavar Jung
19	B. N. Deshmukh	6 October 1978	18 November 1980	Sri Sadiq Ali
20	Venkat Shrinivas Deshpande	19 November 1980	11 January 1981	–
		12 January 1981	11 August 1982	O P Mehra
21	Dinshah Pirosha Madon	12 August 1982	30 August 1982	–
		31 August 1982	14 March 1983	Idris Hasan Latif
22	Madhukar Narhar Chandurkar	15 March 1983	14 March 1984
23	Konda Madhava Reddy	8 April 1984	21 October 1985
24	Madhukar Hiralal Kania	23 June 1986	1 May 1987	Dr. Shankar Dayal Sharma
25	Chittatosh Mookerjee	2 November 1987	31 December 1990
26	Prabodh Dinkarrao Desai	7 January 1991	13 December 1992	Dr. C Subramaniam
27	Manoj Kumar Mukherjee	9 January 1993	14 December 1993
28	Sujata Manohar	15 January 1994	7 November 1994	Dr. P.C. Alexander
29	Anandamoy Bhattacharjee	21 April 1994	1 April 1995
30	Manharlal Bhikhalal Shah	2 August 1995	9 December 1998
31	Yogesh Kumar Sabharwal	3 February 1999	28 January 2000
32	Bisheshwar Prasad Singh	31 March 2000	14 December 2001
33	Chunilal Karsandas Thakker	31 December 2001	7 June 2004
34	Dalveer Bhandari	25 July 2004	27 October 2005	Mohammed Fazal
35	Kshitij R. Vyas	25 February 2006	18 July 2006	S.M. Krishna
36	Harjit Singh Bedi	3 October 2006	12 January 2007
37	Swatanter Kumar	31 March 2007	30 December 2009
38	Anil Ramesh Dave	11 February 2010	29 April 2010	Kateekal Sankaranarayanan
39	Mohit Shantilal Shah	26 June 2010	8 September 2015
40	Dhirendra Hiralal Waghela	15 February 2016	10 August 2016	Chennamaneni Vidyasagar Rao
41	Manjula Chellur	22 August 2016	4 December 2017
42	Naresh Harishchandra Patil	29 October 2018	6 April 2019
43	Pradeep Nandrajog	7 April 2019	23 February 2020
44	B. P. Dharmadhikari	20 March 2020	27 April 2020	Bhagat Singh Koshyari
45	Dipankar Datta	28 April 2020	11 December 2022
46	Ramesh Deokinandan Dhanuka	28 May 2023	30 May 2023	Ramesh Bais
47	Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya	29 July 2023	Incumbent

Sr. No	Name of the Judge, Justice	Date of Elevation	Date of Retirement	Parent High Court
1	Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (CJI)	13 May 2016	10 November 2024	Bombay
2	Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai	24 May 2019	23 November 2025	Bombay
3	Abhay Shreeniwas Oka	31 August 2021	24 May 2025	Bombay

Sr. no.	Name of the judge, justice	Recruitment	Date of appointment	Date of retirement	Remark
1	Prasanna B. Varale	Bar	18 July 2008	22 June 2024	Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court
2	Sanjay V. Gangapurwala	Bar	13 March 2010	23 May 2024	Chief Justice of Madras High Court

The court has jurisdiction over the states of Maharashtra, Goa and the Union territories of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The court has benches in Nagpur, Aurangabad and Panaji.

Bench	Judge strength	Territorial jurisdiction
Bombay(Principal)	35	Mumbai (City), Mumbai (Suburban), Thane, Palghar, Kolhapur, Nashik, Pune, Raigad, Ratnagiri, Satara, Sangli, Sindhudurg, Solapur, Dadra & Nagar Haveli at Silvassa, Daman, Diu.
Aurangabad	18	Aurangabad, Ahmednagar, Beed, Dhule, Jalna, Jalgaon, Latur, Nanded, Osmanabad, Parbhani, Nandurbar, Hingoli
Nagpur	17	Nagpur, Akola, Amravati, Bhandara, Buldhana, Chandrapur, Wardha, Yavatmal, Gondia, Gadchiroli, Washim
Panaji	04	North Goa (Panaji), South Goa (Margao)
Total	74

Nagpur is an industrial and commercial city situated in the centre of India. Formerly, it was the capital of the former State of CP & Berar, later old Madhya Pradesh and now it is the sub-capital of the State of Maharashtra. A full-fledged High Court was established at Nagpur on 9 January 1936 and contracted by Sir Sobha Singh. Later it was included as a separate bench in the Bombay High Court jurisdiction after the formation of the state of Maharashtra in 1960.

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Sir Gilbert Stone, a Judge of the Madras High Court was appointed as first Chief Justice. The foundation stone of the new building (present High Court building) was laid by late Sir Hyde Gowan on 9-1-1937. The building was designed by Mr. H.A.N. Medd, Resident Architect. It was constructed at a cost of Rs.737,746/-.The building consisted of two stories with a garden courtyard in the centre. The outside dimensions are 400 ft x 230 ft. The original design provided for a main central dome rising 109 feet above ground land, the remainder of the building being approximately 52 feet in height. The building has been constructed with sandstone. The building has Ashlar stone facing and brick hearting. The flooring in the corridors and offices is of Sikosa and Shahabad flag stones. The building is declared open on 6 January 1940. On the opening ceremony the Viceroy of India described this building as a poem in stone. The High Court has a fairly well planned garden on the eastern as well as western sides.

The High Court of Judicature at Nagpur continued to be housed in this building till the reorganisation of states in 1956. With effect from 1-11-1956, eight Marathi speaking districts of Vidarbha formed part of the greater bilingual State of Bombay which came into existence. Remaining fourteen Hindi speaking districts of the former State of Madhya Pradesh became part of the newly constituted State of Madhya Pradesh with the capital at Bhopal. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh was treated as the successor of the former High Court at Nagpur.

A bench of the High Court at Bombay began to sit in this building at Nagpur with effect from 1-11-1956 and continues to do so even after the formation of the State of Maharashtra on 1-5-1960. During the year 1960 the strength of this Bench consisted of four Honourable Judges.

The extension of High Court building consists of two annex buildings on both sides of the existing building viz., North and South Wings. For this Government of Maharashtra has sanctioned Rs. 1,2,926,605/- on dated 21 March 1983. 'South Wing' houses various utilities for the public, i.e. litigants and the Bar as well as High Court Government Pleader's Establishment including Standing Counsel for Central Government and 'A Panel Counsels, and also for the establishment. In the North Wing, it is proposed to accommodate additional Court Halls, Chambers of the Hobble Judges, Judges' Library and the office.

Presently, the strength of this Bench consists of 10 Honourable Judges and total employees are 412.

The Aurangabad bench was established in 1982. Initially, only a few districts of Maharashtra were under the Aurangabad bench. Subsequently, in 1988, Ahmednagar & other districts were attached to the bench. The bench at Aurangabad has more than 13 judges. The jurisdiction of the Aurangabad Bench is over Aurangabad, Dhule, Nandurbar, Jalna, Jalgaon, Beed, Parbhani, Latur & Osmanabad. The bench also has a Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa office. The present building of bench is situated in huge premises. The garden is beautifully maintained. Lush green grass invites the attention of any passerby. The HC bench at Aurangabad is approximately 4 km from the Aurangabad Airport and around 6 km from the central bus stand. The new building has 13 court halls in all now including two new ones. All the court halls are on the first floor of the building, while the registry of the Court is on the ground floor. The Aurangabad bench has a strong Bar of more than 1000 advocates, but the Aurangabad bench does not have jurisdiction over company law matters.

The Aurangabad Bench celebrated its 28th anniversary on 27 August 2009.

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article is written like a story. Please help rewrite this article to introduce an encyclopedic style and a neutral point of view. (January 2018)

Due to the continued demand of the people of Marathwada region for the establishment of a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad under sub-section (2) of Sec. 51 of the Act, the State Government first took up the issue with the then Chief Justice R. M. Kantawala in 1977. On 22 March 1978, the State Legislative Assembly passed a unanimous resolution supporting a demand for the establishment of a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad to the effect : "With a view to save huge expenses and to reduce the inconvenience of the people of the Marathwada and Pune regions in connection with legal proceedings, this Assembly recommends to the Government to make a request to the President to establish a permanent Bench of the Bombay High Court having jurisdiction in Marathwada and Pune regions, one at Aurangabad and the other at Pune."

The said demand for the constitution of a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad was supported by the State Bar Council of Maharashtra, the Advocates' Association of Western India, several bar associations and people in general. It is necessary here to mention that the resolution as originally moved made a demand for the setting up of a permanent Bench of the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad for the Marathwada region, and there was, no reference to Pune which was added by way of amendment. Initially, the State Government recommended to the Central Government in 1978 to establish two permanent Benches under sub-sec. (2) of Section 51 of the Act, one at Aurangabad and the other at Pune, but later in 1981 confined its recommendation to Aurangabad alone.

The State Government thereafter took a Cabinet decision in January 1981 to establish a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad and this was conveyed by the Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Law & Judiciary Department, communicated by his letter dated 3 February 1981 to the Registrar and he was requested, with the permission of the Chief Justice, to submit proposals regarding accommodation for the Court and residential bungalows for the Judges, staff, furniture, etc. necessary for setting up the Bench. As a result of this communication, the Chief Justice wrote to the Chief Minister on 26 February 1981 signifying his consent to the establishment of a permanent Bench at Aurangabad. After adverting to the fact that his predecessors had opposed such a move and had indicated, amongst other things, that such a step involved, as it does, breaking up of the integrity of the institution and the Bar, which would necessarily impair the quality and quantity of the disposals.

It, however, became evident by the middle of June 1981 that the Central Government would take time in reaching a decision on the proposal for the establishment of a permanent Bench under sub-sec. (2) of Section 51 of the Act at Aurangabad as the question involved a much larger issue, viz. the principles to be adopted and the criterion laid down for the establishment of permanent Benches of High Courts generally. This meant that there would be an inevitable delay in securing the concurrence of the Central Government and the issuance of a Presidential Notification under sub-sec. (2) of S. 51 of the Act. On 19 June 1981, the State Government accordingly took a Cabinet decision pending the establishment of a permanent Bench under sub-sec. (2) of S. 51 of the Act at Aurangabad for the Marathwada region, resort be had to the provisions of sub-section (3) thereof. On 20 June 1981, the Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Law & Judiciary Department wrote to the Registrar stating that there was a possibility of a delay in securing concurrence of the Central Government and the issuance of a notification by the President under subsection (2) of S. 51 of the Act for the establishment of a permanent Bench at Auangabad and in order to tide over the difficulty, the provisions of sub-sec. (3) of Section 51 of the Act may be resorted to and he, therefore, requested the Chief Justice to favour the Government With his views on the matter at an early date. On 5 July 1981, the Law Secretary waited on the Chief Justice in that connection. On 7 July 1981 the Chief Justice wrote a letter to the Chief Minister in which he stated that the Law Secretary had conveyed to him the decision of the State Government to have a Circuit Bench at Auangabad under sub-sec. (3) of Section 51 pending the decision of the Central Government to establish a permanent Bench there under sub-section (2) of S. 51 of the Act. The Chief Justice then added: "I agree that some such step is necessary in view of the preparations made by the Government at huge costs and the mounting expectations of the people there."

On 20 July 1981, the Law Secretary addressed a letter to the Registrar requesting him to forward, with the permission of the Chief Justice, a proposal as is required under sub-section (3) of S. 51 for the setting up of a Bench at Auangabad . In reply to the same, the Registrar by his letter dated 24 July 1981 conveyed that the Chief Justice agreed with the suggestion of the State Government that action had to be taken under sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the Act for which the approval of the Governor was necessary and he enclosed a copy of the draft order which the Chief Justice proposed to issue under sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the Act. On 10 Aug. 1981, the Law Secretary conveyed to the Registrar the approval of the Governor. On 27 Aug. 1981, the Chief Justice issued an order under sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the Act to the effect: "In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (No. 37 of 1956) and all other powers enabling him on this behalf, the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, with the approval of the Governor of Maharashtra, is pleased to appoint Aurangabad as a place at which the Hon'ble Judges and Division Courts of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay may also sit." This is the history of how the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted. The Constitution of the Bench by The Hon’ble Chief Justice V.S.Deshpande then came to be challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra was allowed and the people's aspirations from Marathwada were recognized. The Judgment is a reported one (State of Maharashtra v. Narain Shyamrao Puranik) in AIR 1983 Supreme Court 46.

When the High Court of Bombay constituted a bench in Porvorim, Goa, Justice G.F Couto was appointed its first Goan permanent judge. Justice G.D. Kamath was appointed as judge in 1983 and later in 1996 as Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court. Justice E.S da Silva was elevated in 1990 and was a judge of this court till his retirement in 1995. Justice R.K. Batta and Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar were Judges of the Goa bench for 8 and 12 years respectively. Justice F.I Rebello, was appointed Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court in 2010 and retired in 2011. Justice Nelson Britto was Judge for five years. Justice A.P Lavande, Justice F.M.Reis, and Justice M.S. Sonak, were senior lawyers who practiced in the Goa Bench before their elevation. Presently Goa has one lady judge, Justice Anuja Prabhudesai. Justice A Prabhudesai and retired Justice Nutan Sardesai who were both District Judges.

Prior to the annexation of Goa, Daman and Diu the highest Court for the then Portuguese State of India was the Tribunal da Relação de Goa functioning at Panjim. Originally established in 1554, the Relação de Goa used to serve as the high court of appeal for all the Portuguese East Indies territories of the Indian Ocean and the Far East, including what are now Mozambique, Macau and East Timor, besides India itself. The Relação de Goa was abolished when a Court of Judicial Commissioner was established w.e.f. 16 December 1963 under Goa-Daman & Diu (Judicial Commissioner Court) Regulation, 1963. In May 1964 an Act was passed by the Parliament which conferred upon the Court of Judicial Commissioner, some powers of the High Court for the purposes of the Constitution of India.

Parliament by an Act extended the jurisdiction of High Court at Bombay to the Union territory of Goa Daman & Diu and established a permanent Bench of that High Court at Panaji on 30.10.1982

From its inception, the Hon'ble Shri Justice Dr. G.F.Couto who was at that time acting Judicial Commissioner was elevated to the Bench of High Court of Bombay. The Hon'ble Shri Justice G.D.Kamat was elevated to the Bench on 29.8.1983.

With the passing of Goa, Daman & Re-organization Act, 1987 by the Parliament conferring Statehood to Goa, the High Court of Bombay became the common High Court for the states of Maharashtra and Goa and the Union territories of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu w.e.f. 30.5.1987.

The High Court was shifted from the old building of Tribunal da Relação to Lyceum Complex at Altinho, Panaji and started functioning there from 3.11.1997. The main building at the said Complex, constructed in the year 1925 by the Portuguese Government, was renovated by the Goa state government and inaugurated by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of Bombay High Court Shri M.B.Shah on 2.10.1997.The Hon'ble Chief Justice of Bombay High Court, Shri Y. K. Sabharwal, inaugurated the 2nd building on 9.9.1999. Both these buildings now house several departments of the Bombay high court – panaji bench.

Due to the space crunch in the lyseum complex, a new building complex is being built in alto – betim porvorim region in Porvorim. The new building was inaugurated on 27 March 2021. The first court hearing in the new building was presided on by the divisional bench composed of Chief Justice of the Bombay high court Dipankar Datta and Justice Mahesh Sonak on 17 August 2021.

The Case Status and Causelists of Bombay High Court is available on its official website at www.bombayhighcourt.nic.in. The Orders and Judgments from the year 2005 are also available on the website.

As of March 2012 the High Court has 315,988 civil cases and 45,960 criminal cases pending. At the same time, the District and subordinate courts under the Bombay High Court have a total of 3,179,475 pending cases.

• High courts of India
• List of chief justices of the Bombay High Court
• List of chief justices of the Supreme Court of Bombay

• Official WebSite
• Bar Association of Bombay
• Case Status System
• Order/Judgments Retrieval System
• High Court Bharti 2024
• List of Designated Senior Advocates[link points to an access-restricted file]