001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208

National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously: Wikipedia does not prefer any national variety of English. While Wikipedia strives to use language common to all English varieties, some spelling, grammar, or terminology may differ or be absent in a reader's preferred variety. Refer to the relevant style guide on national varieties of English and see a comparison of American and British English.

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

• Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
• Offer a correction if possible.
• References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
• Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 22:15 on 12 January 2025) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
• Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
• Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
• No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
• Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
• Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

[[]] between president of Lebanon is missing. ArionStar (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not linking the president of Lebanon article may have been a deliberate choice. MOS:OVERLINK encourages us not to link unless necessary, and the bold linked article already has details and a link on what the president of Lebanon is.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Linking less, like here, was discussed at Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 112 § The Dark, Blue Sea. I would say I've still seen it similarly linked more often than not, but have no preference (other than consistency going forward). —Bagumba (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"... that Adrien Nunez (pictured), despite limited playing time, was more highly paid than some NBA draft lottery picks while in college?"

This hook is incomprehensible to an international audience. It doesn't even specify the sport. To me, it's highly unclear why Nunez would be paid at all during college, let alone what the monetary value of a 'projected draft pick' is (is that good?). The wording could even be taken as saying that he was paid in draft picks, which I doubt was the intention. It's probably too late to fix this blurb now, but I implore DYK to make their hooks understandable by general readers - not only experts in the topic. Modest Genius 17:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another hook in the set, "that Lars Chemnitz was one of the first recipients of Nersornaat, the highest honor in Greenland?", doesnt specify the field, and the average person wouldnt really know what was received. Click perhaps? This has been standard as far as I can remember. Is there guidance that says otherwise? —Bagumba (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging nominator BeanieFan11. SL93 (talk) 18:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was more saying this and the Nunez hook seemed to be standard and ok, pushing back that there was any prior standard on "dumbing down" hooks, but maybe consensus has changed. —Bagumba (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure. I see some hooks declined with notable wikilinked names because apparently clicking on the name isn't good enough for information. As for something different, Template:Did you know nominations/Oscar Goodman (basketball) has been languishing since November. SL93 (talk) 18:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that NBA draft lottery isn't the greatest either. If you don't know what it is, this article isn't going to help you much. The lead contains "The NBA draft lottery is an annual event ... in which the teams who had missed the playoffs the previous year participate in a lottery process to determine the draft order in the NBA draft" and "After the top four positions are selected (from the lottery slotting system), the remainder of the first-round draft order is in inverse order of the win–loss record for the remaining teams, or the teams who originally held the rights if they were traded". Er, what? Black Kite (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I honestly doubt that John Henry Turpin meets the "up to scratch" bit of WP:POTD/G; it has six citation needed tags and an orange-banner uncited section. Definitely nowhere near GA, although that's far from a POTD requirement. charlotte 02:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all of the uncited information, although now I'd say it's too short for a GA. E_F 02:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]