The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

• You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Vladimir Putin. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Vladimir Putin at the Reference desk.

Vladimir Putin was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones Date Process Result April 15, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed August 16, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 24, 2004, March 3, 2008, September 24, 2008, and March 5, 2012. Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2020. Current status: Former good article nominee

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance). Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Sports & games / Politics and law Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the sports and games in Russia task force. This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force. Soviet Union Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. 2010s High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Section sizes Section size for Vladimir Putin (68 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 21,233 21,233 Early life 4,928 12,162 Education 7,234 7,234 Intelligence career 13,135 13,135 Political career 190 197,549 1990–1996: Saint Petersburg administration 5,252 5,252 1996–1998: Early Moscow career 5,425 5,425 1998-1999: Director of FSB 1,500 1,500 1999: First premiership 3,356 3,356 1999–2000: Acting presidency 6,198 6,198 2000–2004: First presidential term 5,020 5,020 2004–2008: Second presidential term 20,749 20,749 2008–2012: Second premiership 4,594 4,594 2012–2018: Third presidential term 17,930 47,427 Annexation of Crimea 14,292 14,292 Intervention in Syria 4,155 4,155 Russia's interference in the 2016 US election 11,050 11,050 2018–2024: Fourth presidential term 11,984 85,610 COVID-19 pandemic 12,566 12,566 Constitutional referendum and amendments 4,380 4,380 Iran trade deal 934 934 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis 7,958 7,958 Full-scale invasion of Ukraine (2022–present) 34,652 34,652 ICC arrest warrant 4,755 4,755 2023 Wagner rebellion 8,381 8,381 2024–present: Fifth presidential term 12,228 12,228 Domestic policies 9,049 51,653 Economic, industrial, and energy policies 9,878 9,878 Environmental policy 3,913 3,913 Religious policy 4,360 4,360 Military development 6,988 6,988 Human rights policy 5,233 5,233 The media 3,963 3,963 Promoting conservatism 6,900 6,900 International sporting events 1,369 1,369 Foreign policy 3,126 81,552 Asia 9,706 9,706 Post-Soviet states 20,094 20,094 United States, Western Europe, and NATO 21,345 21,345 United Kingdom 1,252 6,195 Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko 2,666 2,666 Poisoning of Sergei Skripal 2,277 2,277 Latin America 2,579 2,579 Australia and the South Pacific 3,739 3,739 Middle East and Africa 14,768 14,768 Public image 226 35,573 Polls and rankings 24,662 24,662 Cult of personality 5,833 5,833 Public recognition in the West 3,510 3,510 Putinisms 1,342 1,342 Assessments 16,380 21,734 After the 2022 invasion of Ukraine 5,354 5,354 Electoral history 2,395 2,395 Personal life 20 45,122 Family 14,147 14,147 Wealth 10,831 10,831 Residences 19 7,611 Official government residences 1,538 1,538 Personal residences 6,054 6,054 Pets 1,011 1,011 Religion 2,873 2,873 Sports 4,536 4,536 Health 4,093 4,093 Awards and honours 605 605 Explanatory notes 43 43 References 44 530 Sources 486 486 External links 6,466 6,466 Total 489,752 489,752

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2022, when it received 25,808,228 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 8 times. The weeks in which this happened: March 2 to 8, 2014 March 18 to 24, 2018 July 15 to 21, 2018 February 20 to 26, 2022 February 27 to March 5, 2022 March 6 to 12, 2022 March 13 to 19, 2022 March 20 to 26, 2022

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Yelena Dzhanova (19 March 2022). "Loser.com is now redirecting visitors to Vladimir Putin's Wikipedia page, the website's latest target in a list that includes Donald Trump and Kanye West". Business Insider.

This article has been viewed enough times to make it onto the all-time Top 100 list. It has had 77 million views since December 2007.

@Nick.mon -- thoughts on what the portrait of him should be? I feel the version you reverted to has slightly unnatural coloration. Cheers! JayCubby Talk 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby: Hi! IMHO the other version was not centered. In my view we could crop "your" version and use that, if it's true that it has a higher resolution. -- Nick.mon (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll upload a recropped version in a few. Cheers! JayCubby 16:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not neutral, doesn't follow manual of style.

Also, associated account is likely a troll account, see https://en.wikipedia.org/key/User:GreatLeader1945/ 195.224.87.165 (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First line of Bashar Al Assad's article: "Bashar al-Assad (born 11 September 1965) is a Syrian politician and dictator who has been the 19th and current president of Syria since 2000."

First line of Putin's article: "Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (born 7 October 1952) is a Russian politician and former intelligence officer who has served as President of Russia since 2012, having previously served from 2000 to 2008."

Later on: "Under Putin's rule, the Russian political system has been transformed into an authoritarian dictatorship with a personality cult."

How can one rule a dictatorship without being a dictator? And if he is one, then why is it acceptable to list that in Assad's article but not here, or vice versa? Which is correct? Adonnus (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To name Putin as a dictator you would need to show that the preponderance of independent reliable sources refer to him as a dictator. I believe that is the case with Assad. 331dot (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that most sources call him that, because.....reasons. Probably because Russia is a world power and Syria is not. Trump's opponents say he will be a dictator but we don't name him one because most sources don't. 331dot (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many exactly do we need for it to be considered a "preponderance"? Is there an exact number? How many reliable sources which do versus reliable sources that don't are required, or what is the ratio? Adonnus (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't give you a specific number. Obviously you can't survey every possible source on this planet, but you should at least be able to show that a wide variety of news outlets and perhaps scholarly sources like academic journals refer to Putin as a "dictator". I think most sources refer to him as "President" because he is "elected"(yes, in rigged elections with token and approved opposition). Most dictators, if they have elections at all, do it as a yes/no question with supervision of the voters(i.e. North Korea, Iraq under Saddam). 331dot (talk) 12:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GreatLeader1945 you are advised not to add anything controversial in the article. You have been reverted more than once. Please discuss, cite reliable sources and gain consensus before adding anything. Thank you. ShaanSengupta 15:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Easily sourced......and is so on every related pages that have gone through many talks. If editors are not familiar with the topic they should at least do some minimal research before posting.

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Should add to the body

Under the administrations of Vladimir Putin, Russia has experienced democratic backsliding, and has been described as an authoritarian dictatorship. Putin's policies are generally referred to as Putinism.

what is being talked about in this case - is has Russia, that has a "dictator" moved from authoritarianism to totalitarianism?

• Greene, Samuel A.; Robertson, Graeme B. (2019). Putin v. the People: The Perilous Politics of a Divided Russia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-23839-6. JSTOR j.ctvfc5417.
• Krzywdzinski, Martin (2020). Consent and Control in the Authoritarian Workplace: Russia and China Compared. Oxford University Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-19-252902-2. officially a democratic state with the rule of law, in practice an authoritarian dictatorship
• Fischer, Sabine (2022). "Russia on the road to dictatorship". SWP Comment. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs. doi:10.18449/2022C30. Retrieved 24 July 2024.

References

Moxy🍁 16:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Putin is undeniably a dictator, though his regime masks its authoritarian nature through the guise of democratic elections. These "choiceless elections" create a facade of choice where none truly exist. They adopt a similar approach with control of the media, threatening journalists instead of telling them what to write; and social media, throttling YouTube and Facebook instead of blocking them. This approach is more subtle than Lenin and Stalin, and allows Putin to manipulate and control the population without the overt use of force common with the more blatant dictatorships. While historians will likely label him a dictator in retrospect, most current independent media still buy into this pretense and may still refer to him by his official title as president. But he is a dictator in every sense of the word and it belongs in the lead. IntrepidContributor (talk) 14:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  As I said above, it needs to be shown that the preponderance of English language reliable sources use the term "dictator" to refer to Putin. You seem to be admitting this isn't the case. It may be a pretense, and in casual conversation I would agree with you, but here we need sources. 331dot (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I am admitting that the news media are too careful about it. But I don't think we need a preponderance of such sources to call a spade a spade. If there is a compromise that is needed here, I can agree to put it somewhere else in the lead paragraph, couching it in some language like 'his rule has been characterised as a dictatorship". IntrepidContributor (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Then offer sources that say that. Yes, we need sources, because that's what we do here- summarize sources. Based on your criteria, Donald Trump could be termed a "dictator" as many feel he was/will be. 331dot (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  There are lots of sources [1][2], including many in Russian also [3]. As much as I don't like Trump, if you are going to call him or the US system as rigged as Putin's Russia, then I give up on any compromise with you. IntrepidContributor (talk) 16:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It's not a comment on the system, it's simply what some out there say about him. Time will tell. 331dot (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It is a fallacious argument and not appropriate for this talk page. IntrepidContributor (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You're not the arbiter of what is appropriate for this page. In any event, it's not just up to me or you. Good day. 331dot (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It is fallacious and inappropriate because literally no reliable sources call Trump a dictator. There may very well have been something fishy about the elections, and Musk's bank account, but a dictator he is not. The institutions of the US are too strong to be manipulated or coopted in the way Putin captured the state in Russia. IntrepidContributor (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You said "I don't think we need a preponderance of such sources to call a spade a spade". My only point was that there are people who would want us to call Trump a dictator, so yes, we do need sources. I don't agree he is one, but Google "trump dictator" and see what comes up. There are plenty of people who think he is. I'm not comparing political systems. 331dot (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I hear you but I provided sources and I still think you was being a bit facetious in comparing Putin to Trump and pontificating about the latter's future. In my opinion, we should include dictator along with his "president" title, even if he is not referred to as that in the preponderance of everyday news sources. I'm not sure if you've been following events over the last few years, but he is literally on the level of Kim Jong Un, who we call a "dictator", even though most news sources call him "leader". IntrepidContributor (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I am afraid to add the "dictator" to the lede or infobox you would need to demonstrate that a vast majority of sources call him a dictator (rather than just a president). Tbh I do not think this is the case. Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Many living dictators, past and present, like Assad or Kim Jong Un, often referred to as "president" or "leader" in many news sources. I don't think we need vast majority of news sources explicitly calling Putin a "dictator" in their every day reporting. I think we only need only few reliable sources relevant to the topic. IntrepidContributor (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Very concerned here that people are not doing basic research about the past decade or so. The fourth wave of democratization uses Russia as the main example. A parade of terminology to capture the spirit of “Putinism” has evolved in parallel with changes in the nature of Putin’s regime—from “managed democracy” early in his second presidential term (2004–2008), to “competitive authoritarianism” with a “kleptocratic” political economy, to “personalistic, autocratic, conservative, populism” or simply “dictatorship” after 2012 sourced to

  • Levitsky, S.; Way, L.A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Problems of International Politics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-49148-8.
  • Fish, M. Steven (2018). "What Has Russia Become?". Comparative Politics. 50 (3). Comparative Politics, Ph.D. Programs in Political Science, City University of New York: 327–346. ISSN 0010-4159. JSTOR 26532689.
  • Greene, Samuel A.; Robertson, Graeme B. (2019). Putin v. the People: The Perilous Politics of a Divided Russia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-23839-6. JSTOR j.ctvfc5417.
  • Zygar, M. (2016). All the Kremlin's Men: Inside the Court of Vladimir Putin. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-61039-740-7.
  • "Validate User". Validate User.
  • Taylor, B.D. (2018). The Code of Putinism. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-086734-8.

  Moxy🍁 18:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Some of us are doing basic research. Some of us can also read Russian and have access to a bigger pool of sources. I do not think anyone argues that Putin should not be called a dictator in the body of the article. We are now discussing the lede, where the definition of Putin as a dictator has again been added by an editor who does not participate at the talk page but has warnings about disruptive editing in contentious topics. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Ymblanter I have reverted the addition of the term "dictator". Have served them with Contentious topic notice at their TP. They already had Balkans & Eastern Europe notice served once, so BLP this time. This isn't the first time this addition by the user has been reverted. They were even pinged here to come and discuss but they are just refusing to engage. WP:DISRUPTSIGNS & WP:IDHT. Shaan Sengupta 03:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks. I would have just blocked them but I am obviously involved. Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Ohhhh I though you were arguing to remove the term from the lead. Was not aware it was a second addition of the term. Moxy🍁 14:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I am indeed arguing that whereas the presented argumentation is sufficient to keep the term in the article (and even to write a paragraph about it), it is possibly not sufficient to use it in the lede. Ymblanter (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what your saying - is your suggestion we remove the term entirely from the article? ....its been in the lead and article for many years. Do we have any sources that indicate there is any debate on its usage? Moxy🍁 15:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I object to the definition of putin in the first paragraph of the article as a Russian politician (president) and dictator. This definition has not been there for years. It was repeatedly added by GreatLeader1945, who is a disruptive editor on their way to topic ban, and every time quickly reverted. Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Moxy noone is advocating to remove it from the body of the article. The purpose of this thread is about the repeated addition of the word "dictator" by an editor, who even after so many reverts and warning continues to add it. And it is not related to any other part of the article but only from the lede (i.e. the very first line, the introductory line of the article). Shaan Sengupta 03:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes much more sense. Moxy🍁 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]