Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ayesha Takia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ayesha Takia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ayesha Takia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajasthan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief Secretary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaunpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Economy of Lucknow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economy of Lucknow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Indefensible (talk) 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 25 Cents FC. My apologies for the late response; things have been rather busy for me lately, and I never seem to have time to do as much on-Wiki work as I would like. The FLC you nominated was archived in July, meaning that the page was not promoted to FL when the FLC was closed. While you made efforts to address comments there, the list did not have any declared support for promotion to FL status, even after several months. We can't leave FLCs open indefinitely, so at a certain point archiving an FLC like this is the only real option. My best advice is to beef up the lists with a reference column to ensure that each entry has cites that support all information, as one of the reviewers commented on that topic. Then the page will have a better chance of gaining support in a future nomination. Cheers. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Giants2008. Thanks a lot for responding. FLC promotion concept is cleared. I will ensure that list get good support. Thanks again. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  03:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi 25 Cents FC! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of chief ministers from the Indian National Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puducherry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ayesha Takia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ayesha Takia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rahul Gandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2019 general election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @25 Cents FC: please remove controversial section from Trinamool Congress, Samajwadi Party, and Nationalist Congress Party. In politics controversy is common unless proven guilty by court. 2409:40E0:4F:6483:E8B9:AA70:4A93:4A54 (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The list of articles you have mentioned is not protected in any way, which means you can also remove them if you find they have been added insignificantly. However, please make sure you discuss the removal on the respective talk page before removing them. Also, if you feel that they should not be removed, you can include them within the respective sections in a chronological manner. Consider Indian National Congress or Bhartiya Janta Party as an example. Whether it's the Bofors scandal, Babri Mosque demolition, 2002 Gujarat Riots, the 2G spectrum case and etc; all are covered in their respective years. Hope this helps! Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  13:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is regarding this edit. If it is the third largest economy, then the second one needs to be mentioned, since it only has Maharashtra. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fylindfotberserk, I apologize. I just checked RBI's data on the largest economy part. The state is neither second nor third; it's rather the fourth-largest economy. I have corrected and added a citation as well. Thanks. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  21:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Thanks for taking care of that. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS , I am surprised that there isn't a separate page on the politics of Uttar Pradesh.Government of Uttar Pradesh is not a substitute because that mostly deals with administration rather than politics. I wonder is that something you can work on. I mostly concentrate articles related to Maharashtra, and therefore can not do full justice to one on Uttar Pradesh. Please thing about it. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Jonathansammy, hope you are doing well in life. Apologies for the late response. I considered adding a section on the politics of Uttar Pradesh while working on the article. However, due to the political sensitivity of the state, I decided against it. Such a section would likely attract controversies, daily news, analysis, and advertisement material related to the current Chief Minister, regardless of the year. It would also entail discussing the number of caste and communal riots that occurred under a particular Chief Minister, crime rate reductions, state development during their tenure, among other factors. Additionally, it would require the inclusion of several subsections, such as the electoral history of political parties, details on the legislative assembly including the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha representatives, as well as information on how many times presidential rules were imposed. Furthermore, as you may have noticed, some IP users are inclined towards making this geography article solely about the Hindu religion, prompting me to request page protection. Therefore, my recommendation would be to refrain from including a separate section on the politics of Uttar Pradesh. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  20:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  , Thanks for your detailed reply. I understand your concerns but I was alluding to a stand alone article on politics of Uttar Pradesh like the one on Politics of Maharashtra.Somehow that article has not attracted as many contentious edits as some other pages I have worked on so far.I know that given the size of UP, the Politics article would consume a lot of your time but I hope you tackle the subject some time in the future. All the best.Jonathansammy (talk) 17:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] add the number of votes on assembly website by using this official website. Other sources are giving varying figures. This is authentic. Here just enter state and constituency and get the results. Admantine123 (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have responded back as well. Oritsu.me (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we are supposed to follow the WP:INCITIES guidelines for the arrangements. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) :Hi @Fylindfotberserk: , yes of course. Is it related to Uttarakhand?--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  14:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI @Fylindfotberserk, thanks for bringing this to my notice. I will make sure to adhere to WP:INCITIES :) 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  14:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Are you going to re-add this? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but in Flora and fauna section. I have saved the content in my sandbox. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I was wondering why there is no mention of tigers . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha sure This article was GA though, not sure how come it was delisted. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I replied you recently on the discussion recently started. Also, do check your mail.-Admantine123 (talk) 00:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Congratulations, 25 Cents FC! The list you nominated, List of state presidents of the Indian National Congress, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]