This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATHSLOPU06:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Awesome Aasim! I was going through Wikipedia:Protection policy and just happened to expand the "Are you in the right place?" message I originally created and added there (as well as to other policy pages), and I was impressed with what I saw! Astonished and curious, I took a deeper look and was completely blown away! You went as far as to create Template:Right place - a template for standardizing these messages, and then also created Template:Right place/styles.css - an accompanying style page for the template as well! Giving you this barnstar and recognizing you for your extremely hard work and the time you spent with creating this template is the very least that I could do. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for your dedication and for the positive impact that you have on this project. :-) ~Oshwah~21:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am only a human. I make mistakes from time to time. Unless if the mistake is repeated, there is no need to warn me and I will likely thank you for reverting my error.
Let's keep my talk page clean. Cursing is a bad habit and is not super professional. If you have trouble with cursing, you can view this wikiHow article that will help you stop cursing.
Wikipedia matters go on this talk page only. If you have matters related to other projects, please see the talk pages for the full list of wikis that I edit.
Check your CAPS LOCK key. Messages in ALL CAPS are also not considered civil. Use bold text or italicized text or underlined text for emphasis.
I am not always online, but you may be able to get a faster reply if you email me. Note that if there is abuse, I may share the contents with administrators.
It is our pleasure to invite you to join a study at the University of Minnesota! The objective of the study is to understand how large language models (LLMs) impact the collaborative knowledge production process, by investigating knowledge contributors’ interactions with LLMs in practice.
If you have used LLMs (e.g., GPT, Llama, Claude...) in the process of contributing to Wikipedia (eg. grammar check, finding resources, writing scripts...), we’d love to join the study! You will be engaging in a 45-60 min interview, talking and reflecting about your experience with Wikipedia and your perception/usage of LLMs in Wikipedia. Your valuable input will not only help us understand practical ways to incorporate LLMs into the knowledge production process, but also help us generate guardrails about these practices. All participation would be anonymous.
In addition, if you know any editor who may have used LLMs during their edits, we highly appreciate it if you could share their contact with us, as we can reach out to them.
