This user is mostly inactive. The response to messages on my talk page may be delayed. Please e-mail me if you wish to contact me more quickly.

Post New Discussion

In addition, I changed the categorization of your user page from [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot|your username]] to [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot|Billscottbob]]. The instructions are a bit ambiguous, but this should allow StatusBot to start keeping track of your status. Cheers! --Ratiocinate 23:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My comment wasn't directed at you. I was advising pgsylv that they have to note on the talk page why they're removing the prod template from the article. Bearcat 19:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified the term to make it more appropriate and will added more once gather enough information. Salman 19:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of deaths reported in Who's Who 1914, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deaths reported in Who's Who 1914. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 00:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No prob, still not encyclopedic IMHO but reasonable minds may differ. Carlossuarez46 00:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes I do. I want to be able to loudly declare my personal beliefs to whomever cares through the use of userboxes. And I also would like to reply directly to messages, if that's possible, rather than just write on this wall. How do I master such a world as this glorious one (that of Wikipedia)? Carmabelle7912 02:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for those great links, although I didn't notice the userbox links until I had already gone and copied ones I liked from other peoples pages, a painstaking process. I have a question now: there's an article which I want to clean up, one about an Egyptian queen whom I know little about, but it's mostly formatting I want to clean up (the style is really informal). Do I have to propose edits on the discussion page, or just go for it? Carmabelle7912 04:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact, I don't work at Strath anymore. And since that time I haven't had the free time necessary to edit Wikipedia very much, as you'll notice if you look at my contributions.

Within 24 hours of the block coming into effect, my account was unblocked, enabling me to continue editing while any students who were not logged in could not. That was definitely a satisfactory solution for me.

There is no formal involvement of the IT Department in Wikipedia. The nature of my job at STS gave me hours of free time every day, some of which I used to devote to maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. I still use this site extensively, but am no longer an active editor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfrydj (talk • contribs) 19:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

/Carmabelle7912

Hi, because you made a recent edit to Jonas Salk, I wanted to inform you that I am planning on bringing the article to FAC. Are you interested? Leranedo (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billy, you are an extremely pompous wikipedia member. Just thought you should know. I still enjoy your company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastonlee (talk • contribs)

Hi, Billscottbob. Concerning Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yew-Kwang Ng, would you consider signing your Edit (4 tildes (~ 4X) will do it)? Otherwise, it might look like I "voted" twice but forgot my first one (;). Thanks. --Thomasmeeks 13:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done.

I apologize, I applied the wrong template, and I agree it should have been marked for speedy deletion. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastonlee (talk • contribs)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Billscottbob! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. β 15:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In This AFD I added a question directed at you, As a courtesy I wanted to let you know in case you didn't have the page watchlisted.--Cube lurker (talk) 23:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On another users comment i've struck through the question. I still believe in the sentiment expressed, but it was the wrong forum.--Cube lurker (talk) 00:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Up to you, but in general i'd like to see people keep it in mind for the future If you want to see what others have to say on this specific article It's ok on my end. Although I won't speak for the article writer. I'm just an outside commentor. I've had a conversation with corvus who suggested that I was a bit out of line. Feel free to check out his talk page and mine for my replies. My reply wasn't really about this article in particular, just something i've seen (imho) too often on afd. I don't mean any hard feelings between us.--Cube lurker (talk) 00:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little insight as to why I was in the mood I was, I commented in this afd. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Kennedy (journalist). Someone nominated an article about the man who broke the story of the German surrender in WWII after the article had been written for 18 minutes. It colored my view of afd this evening. Again hope there's no hard feelings.--Cube lurker (talk) 01:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good in my book. Appreciate the reaction to the comments even if I was a little blunt. best wishes.--Cube lurker (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to withdraw a nomination and you're the only person who has commented that it should be deleted so far, you can just say on the page that you withdraw the nom, and an admin will close the discussion. Then you can remove the afd tag from the article page. Corvus cornix_talk 00:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.  :) Corvus cornix_talk 03:32, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Slackcountry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing a diff summary with my reversion - I had thought with that edit that in fact I was rolling back further than I was at the time, and that the actual edit that I was undoing was a formatting error that had previously occurred.

Hopefully the problem is fixed now, the article is looking good. I apologize if I caused any problems in the meantime. Bobo. 16:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, its always good to learn something new. I've placed the template on Wizards and Muggles Rock for Social Justice!, Jingle Spells: Leaky's Rocking Christmas and Rocking Out Against Voldemedia. Thanks. Hpfan9374 (talk) 07:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some copyediting, and posted a couple of comments on the talk/discussion page of the essay.

I think the essay still needs a lot of work, but it is original (as best I know; I not aware of anything similar in the Index, for example) and it's potentially quite useful for readers. So it merits some further discussion about improving it, and moving it (eventually) from userspace to projectspace. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest posting a note at the talk pages of Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia, asking for comments and welcoming edits. You might also look (first) at those two pages to see if they have anything that you want to incorporate. And then wait a week or so to see whether anyone does want to comment or edit the essay. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you were quick on that one... I went to add the reference section I left out and you'd already done it.. thanx! Dlabtot (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, do post it at talk WP:RS and WP:V too.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 02:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done Billscottbob (talk) 04:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should also take a look at the article Reliability of Wikipedia. It's got a different focus than your essay, but you might be able to take some information (or concepts) from it, and of course you'll want to include a link to it in your essay. You might also want to post a note on the article talk page about your essay; while that technically wouldn't be about improving the article per se, it's allowable per WP:IAR because what you're doing is trying to improve Wikipedia. Just keep it brief, of course. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you should move it to projectspace. Do remove the notice about anyone being welcome to edit it; projectspace essays are always editable by other editors, unlike userspace ones.

The worst that can happen is that someone decides to userfy the essay, putting it back in your userspace, but I think that's unlikely. So no reason not be be bold. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 02:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty unusual for an essay to have a two-character shortcut. Policies and guidelines, sure - and WikiProjects may be forced to take another shortcut in that case. For your essay, something like WP:AREL or WP:ARY or even WP:ASSR seem appropriate, or use another three or four character shortcut you like. It's not critical. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, i've fixed your arrows (it was pretty simple, just take a look at the diff). If you want to link the images, you will need to implement some form of either {{Click}} or ImageMap (click is easier, imagemap looks nicer). If you need more help let me know. Best regards! --omtay38 07:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Vail, Colorado Sparwood, British Columbia Ultra low frequency Salle Regional District of Central Kootenay, British Columbia Nahanni National Park Reserve Regional District of Central Okanagan, British Columbia CBR-FM Michael Copps Costello Northern Rockies Regional District, British Columbia Calgary-Edmonton Corridor Rossland, British Columbia Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District, British Columbia Regional District of East Kootenay, British Columbia Calgary Police Service Rod Love Super low frequency Capital Regional District, British Columbia Flag of Calgary, Alberta

Cleanup Namlish Port Moody, British Columbia Runglish Merge X band Plant hormone Wyatt McIntyre Add Sources Waitakere Václav Klaus Konglish Wikify Philosophy of education Alpha Delta Phi Alpha Tau Omega Expand KFC Swift Current, Saskatchewan Study abroad

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved Josh710's comments from the top of this page to here per WP:TP. Billscottbob (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

please dont destroy my 2 wikipedia. webpage mate I just asking you leave it. from Josh710 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh710 (talk • contribs)

I Have rite to remove your tag because. I did create there my 2 wikipedia website now.

please dont not add you tag because your are makeing it to look bad on my 2 wikipedia website. I dont want to makeing it look bad on my 2 wikipedia website. I want to my 2 wikipedia website Look very good because people want to add their information on my 2 wikipedia website. Once again please dont add you tags please. From Josh710

ps i did that my comment in better english

cya soon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh710 (talk • contribs)

YOU ARE DESTROYING MY 2 wikipedia website. You are makeing it look very bad on my my 2 wikipedia website so please dont do that i did creat my 2 wikipedia website

you tag is looking very bad on my 2 wikipedia website SO PLEASE DONT DO THAT. please Billscottbob

I mean it because you are make me look very bad on my 2 wikipedia website so please dont do that Billscottbob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh710 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I AM VERY SORRY I WAS GETTING Angy with you once again i am very sorry for getting angy with you please forgive me from josh710 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh710 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==My status==

you know about my poor english in here i cant help it because i was born with poor english. you cant fix it and i cant fix too. cya soon from Josh710 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh710 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will definitely keep my eyes open on his talk page now. His edits do appear to be in good faith, but they're becoming consistently annoying which is making me lean toward that they're subtle acts of vandalism. I'm going to try to explain to him why his edits on Talk:Kid Nation have been reverted. I will start to watch his contribs more and more. Thanks for the heads up Billscottbob! - zachinthebox _{(User • Talk)} 02:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If he keeps it up or if you need any support, let me know and I'll be sure to help out. Looking at his current user/talk page he says that he's leaving Wikipedia. - zachinthebox _{(User • Talk)} 20:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have volunteered to help out as an informal mediator for Parkour based on the request to MedCab for assistance (Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-02-11 Parkour). I am currently taking the time to review the article and talk page history. If you have any questions or concerns, or wish to make an additional comment, please feel free to leave a comment on the case page (Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-02-11_Parkour#Discussion) or on my talk page. Cheers! Vassyana (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a family of three templates to link external media: {{externalimage}}, {{externalvideo}} and {{externalaudio}} I hope that is sufficient for your demands and happy editing. Wandalstouring (talk) 11:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if it seemed rude. I certainly didn't mean it that way, but I rather got the impression that my absolute opinion on the matter was not helping and that people (e.g., Mrslippery) would be happier if I just got lost.... I have already acted on your advice about stepping down before it escalates however – I'm not getting involved with article talk pages again – if anyone reverts anything of mine in future I'll just let them have their way. Easier that way.

Nonetheless, I am thankful that those external links have been cleaned up. Thank you for persevering with it. • Anakin 17:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded Exobasidiomycetes a bit. With the references, I think it's an adequate stub article. --Eastmain (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I'm severely new and have no idea what I'm doing. I found that the 'cite this page' APA reference currently gives a permalink and also gives a time stamp. It is probably best to give just the permalink. I'll post a request to the village pump, but am not sure what page. Proposals? Technical? Mellen22 (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Just selected you randomly because your active on the Category:Third opinion Wikipedians. What to you think of this Afd result. Cache of document here. SunCreator (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that since there are 1,780,000 Google Scholar hits on "Functional Disorders" the topic is certaintly worthy of an article. However, I don't think that an article on the Evolution of Functional Disorders should exist. The article was well-referenced and well-written and the topic appears notable, so it meets WP:N and WP:V. As for addressing WP:OR, if only the truly relevant and sourced information is left, there is absolutely no issue. If the information about the basic facts of functional disorders is left, there is no synthesization of information.

I do not believe this should have been deleted but merged into Functional Disorders.

I do not think that undeletion is neccesary. Just take the work and research, adapt it to be more encyclopedic and general, and make a page of Functional Disorders.

That is MHO. I hope that answers your question. Billscottbob (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. The subject doesn't interest me at all so I doubt I'll go creating an article. SunCreator (talk) 23:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I might get around to it.

P.S. I was just looking for the least controversial way to go about it. If I were !voting at AfD, I would have just !voted to merge the whole thing into Functional Disorders. Billscottbob (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm sending this to you because you participated in the Centralized discussion on image placeholders that ended on 23 April.

That discussion must produce a conclusion.

We originally asked "Should the addition of this box [example right] be allowed? Does the placeholder system and graphic image need to be improved to satisfy policies and guidelines for inclusion? Is it appropriate to some kinds of biographies, but not to others?" (See introduction).

Conclusions to centralized discussions are either marked as 'policy', 'guideline', 'endorsed', 'rejected', 'no consensus', or 'no change' etc. We should now decide for this discussion.

Please read and approve or disapprove the section here: Conclusion --Kleinzach (talk) 11:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this message conforms to WP:CANVASSING and has not been sent to anyone has not already participated in the centralized discussion.

You've uploaded File:RoundSq.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This logo should be deleted as it has been replaced by a better PNG version. Billscottbob (talk) 00:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.

This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King's a-poopin' (talk • contribs) 12:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Billscottbob! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alberta Achievement Testing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

already noted in "Education in Alberta"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jackery01 (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Billscottbob,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm messaging you to let you know that I've removed Template:adopting from your user page because you have been inactive for at least 30 days. If you are active again, you are welcome to add the template to your userpage anytime. -- Gabrielchihonglee-Bot (talk) 11:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were previously listed as a participant of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, which was an inactive project until recently. It is currently being revived to continue improving content within the project scope and to conduct assessments. If you are still interested in participating, please move your name from the "Inactive Members" section to the main list on the new participants page, then helping with the revival of the project by providing any suggestions you may have and restarting work efforts. If you are no longer interested, please remove your name from the participants page completely. VarietyEditor (talk) 02:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]