• edit count

Hi! You might find these handy:

• Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
  • Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Special:New pages feed
• New pages sorted
• Stub Sort
• New Accounts
• Website Archive
• Cheatsheet
• Earwig's Copyvio tool
• Copypatrol copyvio tool
• Dabfix
• Dabsolver
• Dablink
• Dabs with missing entries
• Carbon dating the creation of web content (for checking for wiki mirrors)
• WorldCat
• Google Scholar profile
• WorldCat site
• Pending Changes
• G13 nominees
• Football Club History Database

If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:

• General notability criteria
• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to structure and layout your article
• On how to properly format your citations

	The Minor barnstar
	For your many, many minor edits, which crop up on my watchlist from time to time. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Just trying to help out. Onel5969 19:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor:

About the first article, an editor on Wikipedia wants to remove it. My son wrote it long ago as a present. It has been edited often since so I am not sure what to do.

The second problem is an article in my Sandbox which I moved, I thought, successfully to Wikipedia but Wikipedia says it won't come up. Can't imagine why. I think I wrote the title in the wrong box but I don't know how to change it to the right box. Could you do this?

Thanks for your help as always, Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I don't mind if my article is deleted. Also, I am going to look up your "neigh". Hi there! Joan

Dear Editor:

Will you read and review this article when you have time? Thank you very much. Joan arden murray (talk) 01:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joan. For the first time in a long time, I'm not seeing enough in-depth references from independent, reliable sources to show notability. The first reference is perfect. If you had at least one more like that, it would be fine. Two would be better. Onel5969 09:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Editor. I have found a really good reference in a catalogue published in 1973! Such references are hard to find but at least I found one. I will keep looking! Thank you for your patience.Joan arden murray (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Onel5969TT me, I found good references with lots of information at last! Think the article might be okay but I have had a thought that perhaps article would work better if I reworked as an article on the Toronto Art League Calendars as they are the most notable part of the enterprise. Will try and get back to you in a week or so.Joan arden murray (talk) 22:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops,just saw that you accepted it. Thanks! But I will keep trying to strengthen.Joan arden murray (talk) 13:59, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As you might have noticed, I have reverted several additions of links to variety (universal algebra), which were wrong. I think I have reverted almost all but please double check your edits to see I didn’t miss anything. Thanks! Taku (talk) 09:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have just created a redirect page subvariety (algebraic geometry), which should be the most convenient link target to add a link to a subvareity in algebraic geometry. —- Taku (talk) 09:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the link on the dab page to reflect your new redirect. Onel5969 09:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry about that. These links were originally targeted to the botany article, which did not appear correct to me. I selected the incorrect target out of the two mathematical choices. Onel5969 09:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. These were just mistakes (and not meant to be vandalism or anything). —- Taku (talk) 09:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor:

Would you kindly review this article when you get a chance? Thanks, Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I recently interacted with an academic, Gabriel Wainer, whose BLP was vandalized. He reintroduced text that had been deleted, and another editor removed it, telling Wainer that because of his COI, he needed to make an edit request. Wainer was surprised, as the contents that he tried to reintroduce had been on the page since it was approved by you via AfC. That led me to take a look, and I noticed that when you approved it, over half of the citations were to books, papers, and conference proceedings (co-)authored by Wainer and 1 to his CV. That puzzled me, as I thought that these aren't independent of the subject and so generally aren't acceptable as sources. You're a much more experienced editor than I am, so I assume that there's something I've misunderstood about this, and I'm hoping that you'll briefly explain when / the extent to which an NPROF's professional publications can be used as sources in his/her BLP. I'm asking because I'm trying to improve the page of another NPROF. Thank you! FactOrOpinion (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Non-independent sources can be used to satisfy WP:VERIFY, but do not go towards establishing WP:NOTABILITY. While most articles need to pass GNG, I most likely passed Wainer's article based on his Google Scholar rating, which qualifies under WP:NSCHOLAR. I hope that clears it up a bit for you. Onel5969 21:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, Thank you for taking the time to respond. I wasn't wondering about establishing notability. I was wondering about WP:RS statements like "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" (there's a similar statement in WP:VERIFY) and "the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent sources." Another experienced editor, C.Fred, had also told Wainer "You need to get independent sources for the material" that Wainer wanted to reintroduce, most of which had been sourced to his own publications. I'll keep your comment in mind that non-independent sources can be used to satisfy WP:V. Thanks again, FactOrOpinion (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Ranked-choice voting in the United States#Alaska, 2022–present. Alaska mostly does not do partisan primaries anymore, so I reverted your edit. You may want to check your other disambig edits of this nature. Just Step Sideways 22:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simply directed it to the target of the existing redirect prior to it being made into a dab. I have corrected the dab to what I believe is the correct target, Two-round system. Onel5969 23:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor:

I have a funny kind of request. I moved this article to Wikipedia too soon. Will you put it back in my sandbox? The subject is more than adequately covered in several sites on the Internet. I don't need Earwig's copy viol to tell me that i have overstepped. I may delete it from my sandbox as I don't know the subject and can't contribute anything. Thanks! Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 22:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Joan arden murray (talk) 01:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor:

Will you read this article when you get a chance? I can't use Earwig's Copyviol for the moment since I gummed up entering my password. I am hopeful the article is enough in my words to be accepted. Thank you, Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine. Nice job. Onel5969 12:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear @Onel5969, I want to inform you about my new article , Jawanmard paiez which I think need to be reviewed.

I am thankful for your continuous cooperation's with editors.

sincerely Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor:

When you get a chance, would you kindly check out this article? Many thanks, Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor:

Here is yet one more article for you to consider. I have been more careful about details this time. Thank you for your patience. Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]