SuggestBot

Archive One

Archive Two

Archive Three

RFCs

Now

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw your map work for 2020 United States Senate elections. I believe that a map showing the Petitioners and Respondents in California v. Texas would aid user comprehension. I don't possess the artistic ability to do it myself, but I would appreciate if you could!

Petitioners: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Kentucky, and the District of Columbia.

Respondents: Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia

Thank you for any help you can provide! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatSuperNerd (talk • contribs) 06:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should I make Kentucky a different color, since the governor is the plaintiff in that case, and not the state? Also, right now I'm using yellow and green, any objections to that color scheme? TheSavageNorwegian 00:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is done.

TheSavageNorwegian 00:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Upon further research, Kentucky should probably be a different color. In the state Attorney General is a Republican and the Governor is a Democrat. While the Governor well might be acting in his official capacity (and as the former Attorney General of the state), he does not represent the state. Only the Attorney General can officially do that. Also on the colors, I thought of it as blue (Plaintiff) v. red (Respondent), but it frankly doesn't matter to me, and I don't want to unnecessarily editorialize the partisanship in the litigation. I do love the map, I am glad that you could make it. I think it will add a lot to the article and improve the reader's understanding of the situation greatly! ThatSuperNerd (talk) 02:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

I noted over at User_talk:68.56.148.10 you used rollback on the users talk page without good reason, esp. as the warnings there were stale. As it's in the users userspace, not many people will see it so there was no need to rm something as minor as "reddit sux". That's the end of the trout now, I understand this was very likely a mistake, so just wanted to point it out. Thanks! Ed6767 (talk) 03:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. I didn't mean to use rollback here, sorry. I wanted to undo. While you're here though. What's the statue of limitations on staleness? I get that a user controls their own talk page, but I warned this IP back in October. Only reason it was on my watchlist. Is this just a warning about improper rollback use or would an undo have been inappropriate under any circumstances? TheSavageNorwegian 03:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit to Smith0124's talk page and I brought up your name at Talk:2020 United States Senate election in Maine as I seem to be having a similar discussion with them regarding their removal of polls they see as not relevant. 331dot (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i am Eduardo Zago Braga, you know me, and I know you are so much more experienced than me, but actually in the short description page in the suggested edits page, there is an information, that the short description start with a lowercase letter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardo Zago Braga (talk • contribs) 01:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eduardo Zago Braga: Check out Wikipedia:Short_description#Content. The bottom of that section states, "Use sentence case, starting with a capital letter." You can also find this stated at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Short_descriptions#How_to_write_a_short_description. You start with a capital, and you don't use ending punctuation if it's a sentence fragment. TheSavageNorwegian 01:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be contradictory, doesn't it? What about "Article descriptions should ideally fit on one line, and be between two to twelve words long. They are not capitalized unless the first word is a proper noun, and do not normally begin with initial articles (a, an, the). " in Article Description section in https://m.mediawiki.org/key/Wikimedia_Apps/Suggested_edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardo Zago Braga (talk • contribs) 01:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found your answer. "Descriptions" are a property from Wikidata, and have a slightly different style guide than "Short Descriptions" here on Wikipedia. You can find this near the top of Wikipedia:Short description. "Initially short descriptions were drawn from the Description field in Wikidata entries, but because of concerns about including information directly from another project, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) made provision for these to be overwritten by short descriptions generated within Wikipedia." So, not contradictory as much as it is two separate style guides. The end goal is every Wikipedia article having a short description, following the same, capitalized, syntax. TheSavageNorwegian 02:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eduardo Zago Braga: Mentioning you, in case you missed my reply. I know firsthand how it can be hard to keep track of replies around here. TheSavageNorwegian 02:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Savage Smith has been blocked indefinitely this leaves the content he posted in limbo like the competitive races page and the Nishkanen ratings. We need to do something about this since now that the author of that spot is gone we need to decide what to do in his absence. So Savage what should we do about the stuff keep or remove entirely? I am asking you due to your involvement because I don't want to get into an edit war with someone else. Thank you. Wollers14 (talk) 04:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed Elections Daily had been added to this page by someone and then removed a few days ago. Figured I'd mention here, but I'm the EiC and figured I'd offer that we have been authoritatively cited by the Center for Politics several times. We also have firm editorial standards and an editorial team that works on the ratings. We're a relatively new website, but we are generally seen as reputable within the elections analysis community. If it's not enough that's fine, totally understand, but figured I'd plead our case so to speak. Toa Nidhiki05 19:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My great-grandparents came to Iowa from Norway. I am somewhat familiar with Iowa, but never visited Norway. Blainster (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SparksyFruit is still reverting back to his unconstructive edits! What should I do? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! I did my revert and logged off. I see now you've been informed about the three-revert rule. Sorry you got caught up in all that! I was about to report them over at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, but then I didn't. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring is the better, more specific spot anyway, I know that now. TheSavageNorwegian 23:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. I know what to do now next time that happens. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 23:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid using rollback in an edit war such as at Fellatio. I know stuff like that is irritating but WP:ROLLBACK is clear. There should be a discussion on article talk and an edit summary pointing to the section. Johnuniq (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I just noticed that the other editor has been indeffed as a sock so ignore the above. Johnuniq (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean you're right though; sorry! Best course of action for me would have just been reporting the account, and using regular undo, right? I didn't do that. I rollbacked and warned the account even though I strongly suspected it was a sock. TheSavageNorwegian 16:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might not get much help with a report unless the problem is obvious. The first revert could just use an edit summary with a reason. Ideally, a second revert would include a link to a section on talk where the revert reason is briefly explained. Standard procedure is that it is up to the person adding material to justify it on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 05:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Louisville Barnstar
		Big Thanks for finding a good and usable image of Louisville mayor Craig Greenberg and placing it within the appropriate articles. Stefen Towers among the rest! 20:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, shucks. Thanks a lot! TheSavageNorwegian 23:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thesavagenorwegian. Thank you for your work on 2026 Minnesota Senate election. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thesavagenorwegian did u even look at my edits? I didn't change the definition of Taiwan. If you look carefully, Taiwan is still defined as a country. I moved Taiwan to the right section per [1], but it's still defined as a country with marriage, and I didn't change that. So your tantrum here seems absolutely illogical and ludicrous. Cyanmax (talk) 05:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied over at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia#Taiwan. I bear you no ill will. I want the article to be high-quality and informative just as I'm sure you do. TheSavageNorwegian 17:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anti-Defamation League on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hubble's law on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Turkic peoples on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Catholic theology on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki UFF DA! - Editing the Wikipedia for Absolute Beginners

Oh, you know, if it isn't just the most basic workshop ever needed, "Wikipedia Editing for Absolute Beginners" for those who haven't had the pleasure of diving into that simple process quite yet. Bless their hearts, they're just starting out, so we thought, why not put something together? Because, you know, it's not like it's rocket science or anything, but hey, we're always happy to lend a hand where we can. And just a little bit of Minnesota Nice to help along the way. 'Uff da!' you say? Well editing the Wikipedia is not hard at all! Join us at one of our three FREE workshops in Minnesota, where you can learn how to edit Wikipedia and add Minnesota's local history in a relaxed and supportive setting. Work alongside others and discover how easy editing Wikipedia can be. The workshops aim to enhance the ability of communities in Greater and rural Minnesota to edit Wikipedia and comprehend it's editing culture and guidelines, as well as to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Minnesota's history. Already good at editing the Wikipedia? You're welcome to come and work on local history Minnesota Wikipedia articles alongside others. Learn more » Registration is required to be included for lunch. Event 1 @ Morris, MN Date & time: Wednesday, October 23, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm CDT Location: West Central Minnesota Historical Center, McGinnis Room, Briggs Library, University of Minnesota-Morris, Morris, Minnesota Event 2 @ Chisholm, MN Date & time: Thursday, November 14, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm CDT Location: MN Discovery Center, 1005 Discovery Drive, Chisholm, Minnesota Event 3 @ Mankato, MN Date & time: Wednesday, November 20, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm CDT Location: Room 2057, 601 Maywood Ave, Memorial Library, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Minnesota Facilitator: Myotus | Joe Hoover These workshops are put on by the Minnesota Historical Society as part of their commitment to the Minnesota local history community and are led by Local History Services.

Myotus (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kiss (band) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to the November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting The organizer of this soiree is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message. Okay its been a while since the Wikipedia Minnesota User Group has meet. Since the last time we meet there has been social upheaval, plague, etc... - no small thing to be sure. There has been some sad lonely discussions on the Minnesota Meetup page on getting together but little action. So here it is. Come and be seen. Talk about the future of the Minnesota User Group and see what nefarious plans we can hatch. Date: Sunday, November 3, 2024 Time: 1 to 3:30 pm (reminder - Daylight Saving Time ends) Place: Wild Mind Ales' 6031 Pillsbury Ave, Minneapolis, MN Look forward to seeing folks!

Myotus (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a added the meeting notes for the November 3, 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting. You will have to forgive me, I am a crap note taker. Sorry! Myotus (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thanks for thinking of me! <3 TheSavageNorwegian 17:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Storrs, Connecticut on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]