• 2601:152:4d01:700:941b:ffff:2f7b:fbb5 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalize edits from Super Why!. - User:2605:59c0:204e:fb10:38c5:705f:4f84:5521 (talk) 03:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  From multiple weeks ago. Please don't report edits that old. Izno (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 21 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• Creepydudewithweridusername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Imacoolcoolguythatcandoanything (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Katesten (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "testicles" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Tdnewrygfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "f\.?c\.?$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file "FC" is an abbreviation of "Football Club" -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Tobs12afc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "f\.?c\.?$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file "FC" is an abbreviation of "Football Club" -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Poopieheadofthepoop (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Wikiusername143 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Cadence Digital (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. This is the name of a company. Promotional edits to Wendy Holden (author, born 1961). Tacyarg (talk) 23:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
• South West RiverWood (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Frost 03:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Fathoms Below (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Iconicmusicians (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. There are at least two results in Google showing variations of Iconic Musiciaans as a musical agency. these edits on Commons show that this is a music industry professional, representing their client, BJ Sam. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 13:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. You didn't provide a link to any website, and I've not been able to find any such company (too many related search returns on those keywords!). I agree, this is someone going through the legit actions of uploading a photo they've taken of a client to Commons. But at this stage I'm reluctant to block for a promotional username here, and feel the message left on their talk page should suffice for now. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• ForgeFront (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Submitted Draft:ForgeFront to AfC. KylieTastic (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  User has changed their username. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• EnvisionGames (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Conceivably the games division of Envision Entertainment - https://www.envision-entertainment.de/games/. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 17:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• RealJordanTerrellCarter (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Playboi Carti, maybe they're really them? Or maybe they just Wokeuplikethis. Knitsey (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Wait until the user edits. Jauerback/_dude. 19:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• SHEJO VARGHESE (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ 19:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• NFmarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – editing Neenah Foundry (NF). 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  User has changed their username. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• TurkászBot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• NARUC-editor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. win8x (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• List of prime ministers of Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. For the record, the same level of protection was required to stop disruptive editing at List of presidents of Bangladesh, some years ago. — Sundostund mppria 15:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Ra rai23487 (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. and Raka rai by myself ... both indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• List of dinosaur genera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent recent IP vandalism. -SlvrHwk (talk) 00:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level 2 warning. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia Day 2025 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Constant page blanking by IPs recently Cyrobyte (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Queen of Hearts. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:1001:B129:3A84:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by TheresNoTime. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Brave (2012 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DD3D:B74C:2265:CF85 (talk) 02:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in five days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Up (2009 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DD3D:B74C:2265:CF85 (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 172.85.214.198 (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• High School Musical 3: Senior Year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DD3D:B74C:2265:CF85 (talk) 02:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 172.85.214.198 (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Fein (song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – presistent vandalism by IP addresses. dotXK 03:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 70.166.192.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Super Why! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Vandalism by remove season 2 cast of Whyatt Beanstalk. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:38C5:705F:4F84:5521 (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Give a good report for User:EvergreenFir. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:38C5:705F:4F84:5521 (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Garth Brooks Discography (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Redirect page unlikely to be in need of editing is a recurring target by an LTA. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• China (region) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection for redirect. Frequent attempts by IP vandals to expand to a page of its own when Greater China is sufficient. MimirIsSmart (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Bride of Chucky (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Gelasin (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Chucky season 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Gelasin (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• That's Entertainment (Hazbin Hotel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: repeated instances of being made and unmade redirect page due to sockpuppet user Magicalr2d2 (talk) 05:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Conestoga wagon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Multiple instances of vandalism or bad edits coming from IPs or new users while it's featured in DYK for the day. PrimalMustelid (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

• Rachel Levine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The talk page is protected. How are we to make edit requests if the talk page to the article is also locked. Thank You. 2600:1003:A011:E677:C1DC:C29F:5BA7:AC64 (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• SiniyaEdita (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I came here to echo this request. I've reviewed several of SiniyaEdita's articles and they are all of a high standard. They also expand our quality coverage of Africa. Worth noting, the user's prior account (Fsmatovu) had autopatrolled status. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ojsyork (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Needforname (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ahola .O (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

• SDGB1217 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

• Dagoofybloke (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Need to add official logo for a school page and edit the name to the more current/appropriate one Dagoofybloke (talk) 13:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done – If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Beeblebrox 19:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• CommunityNotesContributor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Leaning towards no, mainly on account of a lack of demonstrated need, but willing to be overruled or persuaded otherwise. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

As an example; I'd be able to close this RM if there is no consensus, as I did the previous that lacked consensus, but I wouldn't be able to if there was consensus. The one I closed had sat in the backlog for almost two months. CNC (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

• Intrisit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I'm requesting page mover rights because I want to have the ability, which would help in vandalism patrols and other things. Currently, someone moved a page for basically no reason and I'm trying to move it back, otherwise the page will have no former revision history. Thanks! Ali Beary _{(talk2me!) (stalk me?!)} 13:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 411 total edits. — MusikBot 14:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Please review WP:PMCRITERIA. More experience is needed before this right can be granted. In the meantime, you should report page-move vandalism at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Requests to revert undiscussed moves. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

As I also do recent changes patrolling, having this permission will extemeley help me with combatting vandals, as edits requesting review can be viewed on the Recent Changes page, which will help me.

Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 23:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ampil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Note: The bot becoming silly, and marking as already done.

Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

{{already done}} (automated response): This user already has the "reviewer" user right. — MusikBot 05:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ampil I know you noted in your original post, but just in case: this is not already done! Ampil is asking for the permission, which they currently hold, to not expire. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Zanahary, Thanks. I've removing the pin message. Because the bot had not been becoming silly. My PCR right makes without expiry. ~🌀 Ampil 11:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• BryceM2001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary _{(talk2me!) (stalk me?!)} 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• TypeInfo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hello, I've been active in the Wikipedia community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration.TYPEINFO (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

• Sophisticatedevening (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier.

Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, is there something in the Simple Wikipedia you may like to reconsider? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean? ive only done 2 edits to the simple wikipedia

1 to the ultrakill page

2 to my user page Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

oh wait i know what you mean. ill change that. @ToBeFree Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Done, i just copy n' pasted my userpage from the main wikipedia over to the simple. @ToBeFreeTenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

If you copy it to your userpage on meta.wikimedia.org, it will be a global user page for all wikis where you don't yet have a specific userpage. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, I'll decline this request for now. I might grant the pending changes reviewer permission although your request for it is based on a desire for "combatting vandals" rather than accepting non-vandalism, which is what the permission primarily allows you to do. Your Simple English Wikipedia userpage, for the record, had only the following content: penis. The concerns voiced by others on your user talk page seem to confirm my original impression of a lack of experience (and perhaps simply maturity). When you patrol recent changes and inform users about the problems with their edits, the impression you make on the newcomers will often be their primary impression from Wikipedia (or its moderation, its perceived representatives, its community) as a whole. It may help to imagine Wikipedia as a workplace where you interact with colleagues, everyone is paid to behave professionally and to improve the encyclopedia while sitting in an office with a cup of coffee on the desk. Imagine there's a meeting on, let's say 21 February 2025, in this room here, where you apply for the position as "rollbacker" in your company. In your application, you could provide a few examples for obvious, clear vandalism that you reverted, and that you could have reverted more efficiently if you had had access to a rollback link. Perhaps you could also provide a few counterexamples where you undid someone's good-faith contributions and explained the problem to the user, which is a situation where using rollback wouldn't have been an option, and you are aware of this. Feel free to notify me about the request and I'll probably grant it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done yet ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Jingiby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Wikipedia but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jingiby. You had rollback declined a few years ago (June 20, 2018), per this link. At that time, reviewers mentioned your prior blocks on enwiki and an indef block on the Macedonian Wikipedia. The admin who declined your rollback was User:Swarm. Have there been any new developments since 2018 that you would like to bring to our attention here? EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I haven't been blocked on the Macedonian Wikipedia for years, but in general, the attitude towards Bulgarian editors on historical topics there is a quite special. Jingiby (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

By the way, during the last 15 years I am busy to deal with such IPs' activity. Jingiby (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Regarding my mistakes of the past, those of 10 years ago, I will strive to avoid them and not repeat them again. There are no ideal people, but I am neither a paid agent of the Bulgarian authorities, nor are there specially trained propagandists hiding behind my nickname, as some IPs are trying to present me. I am an ordinary person. Jingiby (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Third user comment: I coincide with this user often, everytime I check their contributions they're filled with reverts of IPs and warning messages. I checked and they were unblocked from Macedonian Wikipedia in 2019, plus their claim probably has at least some truth, it's a small Balkan Wikipedia after all. It's also been 6 years and a half since their last request; it had been one year here since they were unblocked at that time, and now it's almost eight, no small amount. I'd recommend a trial period on this user. They'd probably do well. Super Ψ Dro 23:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, User:Super Dromaeosaurus, and thanks for your comment. Jingiby (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Cyberdog958 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or meta:SWViewer. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. cyberdog958 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Callmehelper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hi, I've been editing Wikipedia for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges.

While I’m still learning some aspects of Wikipedia policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Wikipedia.

Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Arthurfragoso (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hello,

Recently, I went on vacation, which has given me more time to dedicate to Wikipedia. During this period, I noticed some issues with the Dark mode theme.

Inspired by user @Synpath, who took the initiative to propose changes to the Drugbox template, I began working on fixing dark mode compatibility in other templates. Specifically, I have contributed to improving Template:Annotated image 4, Template:Enzymatic reaction, and Template:Biochem reaction subunit.

In 2019, I created a Lua module for the Portuguese Wikipedia to assist editors in finding articles without citations. This tool categorizes articles by the month and year the tag was added and allows sorting by pageviews. You can view the module and the associated template. I mention this to demonstrate my ability to work with modules if needed, although I currently do not intend to work on modules.

The primary reason for this request is to be able to contribute more actively to the Drugbox and Chembox templates. I have previously participated in discussions to update the Brazilian drug legal status parameter in them (see: Template talk:Infobox drug/Archive 19#Legal status in Brazil - Add subclasses F1, F2 and F3 and Template talk:Chembox/Archive 13#Template-protected edit request on 15 August 2023).

I am also contemplating starting a project, potentially under the umbrella of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology, to expand the "legal status" parameter to include additional countries, particularly China and India. This expansion would aim to improve greater understanding of how different countries regulate and culturally perceive various substances.

Thanks! -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Evaluation against the granting criteria:

1. Y The editor should be a registered Wikipedia user who has been editing for at least 1 year.
2. Y The editor should have made at least 1,000 overall edits.
3. Y The editor should have made at least 150 total edits to the Template and Module namespaces.
4. Y The editor should have no behavioral blocks (including partial blocks) or 3RR violations for a span of 6 months prior to applying.
5. ? The editor should have worked on the sandbox version of at least three template-protected templates or modules.
6. ? The editor should have requested and had successfully enacted at least five significant edits to template-protected templates or modules.

@Arthurfragoso While you have some activity related to the last two points, I don't see sufficient evidence that these criteria have been fully met. If your intention were limited to dark-mode fixes, I would be inclined to grant the right on a time-limited basis. However, your request indicates plans for more extensive, non-dark-mode fixes. In light of that, I personally am not comfortable granting the right at this time.

Marking this as  Not done based on the above assessment. (If an admin has more familiarity with Arthur's contributions they can/should override this decision.)

Sohom (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)