Loading
  • 21 Aug, 2019

  • By, Wikipedia

User Talk:MaxnaCarta


    PLEASE READ

    NAC Closures If you are here because you disagree with an NAC closure at AFC, please let me know below. I will honour any reasonable request without going to DRV. Administrators should take this notice as consent to revert an NAC of mine for any reason they see fit without request or explanation, though feedback on an incorrect NAC is welcome so I avoid future errors.

    If I rejected your Article for Creation My decision to reject your article is final and I will very rarely consider a request to remove the rejection notice. If you disagree with a rejection, please contact the AFC Helpdesk for a third opinion. If you disagree with a decline, simply resubmit and another editor can assess the submission.

    Did I incorrectly revert your edit? As a counter-vandalism patroller, I occasionally revert minor edits that on the surface, appear problematic but were made in good faith. If you believe this to be the case, you have as much right to restore the edit without asking me to do so.

    Thank you

    The article Disappearance of Samantha Murphy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disappearance of Samantha Murphy and Talk:Disappearance of Samantha Murphy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The article Disappearance of Samantha Murphy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Samantha Murphy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 03:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Your GA nomination of Clean (2022 film)

    The article Clean (2022 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clean (2022 film) for comments about the article, and Talk:Clean (2022 film)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Otuọcha -- Otuọcha (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Concern regarding Draft:Morphy v Land Rover

    Information icon Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morphy v Land Rover, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth and Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Clifton Hill Community Music Centre

    Many of the musicians involved have their own pages, surely making the CHCMC notable by association. And I've already included several reliable secondary sources. - PastelLilac (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @PastelLilaceven if Adele performed a duet with Elton John at my house making international headlines, unfortunately it won’t be notable as notability is not inherited. Sorry. I live in Melbourne, that centre isn’t notable (for the purposes of Wikipedia). — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you saying I could keep piling on the reliable secondary sources (of which there are many to choose from), and you won't budge from this position? And a one off show in your house is a bit different from a venue used by hundreds of musicians over the span of almost a decade. I take it you prefer your commercial stuff. Kate Ceberano's first band grew out of the CHCMC. - PastelLilac (talk) 07:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Those sources do not constitute significant coverage of the subject which is the hall, not the artist who is notable. I won’t “budge” from my decision to draft the article, but another editor will review my decision as it’s now in the draft queue.MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The eMelbourne source is merely to show how the CHCMC is summarised within Melbourne music more broadly, and by a reliable, encyclopedic source. It's a relevant and notable episode in the history of Australian music. Or as the Australian Centre for Contemporary Art put it, one of sixteen "defining moments" that shaped Australian art since 1968. And nowhere is the CHCMC referred to as a "hall". - PastelLilac (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Information icon Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth for comments about the article, and Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, MaxnaCarta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz 05:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

    New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
    • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
    • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
    • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
    • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
    • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
    You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

    MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]