---

“

Life's most persistent and urgent question is, 'What are you doing for others?'—Martin Luther King Jr.

”

“

Have nunchucks. Will travel. - Antonio "Tony The Tiger" Vernon

”

“

Freedom of expression does not truly exist if the right can be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots. - Abe Fortas 393 U.S. 503 (1969)

”

---

Recently listed good articles: Myrmecophyte — Walsh, Michael — History of education in Wales (1870–1939) — Mansfield Hotel — Military-First Girls — Migration (2023 film) — Petway, David — Palaeotherium — Cocina de Autor — Standard-winged nightjar — Ciampi, Anthony — Pro-Fatimid conspiracy against Saladin — Layla M. — Visions of Mana

---

The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are: Line of Duty series 3 (talk | history | start review) • LGBTQ culture in Puerto Vallarta (talk | history | start review) • Dick Simpson (politician) (talk | history | start review) • Darren Moore (talk | history | start review) • Pete Astudillo (talk | history | start review)

---

Articles currently listed for Good article community reassessment:

---

If you appreciate my work above leave a tiger below. If you have trouble finding one that you don't see below go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/key/Tiger and click on any of the subspecies to see more Images.

Archives

1-(20May06-03Oct06) 2-(09Oct06-05Nov06) 3-(07Nov06-26Nov06) 4-(24Nov06-12Dec06) 5-(12Dec06-31Dec06) 2007-JFMAMJJASOND 2008-JFMAMJJASOND 2009-JFMAMJJASOND 2010-JFMAMJJASOND 2011-JFMAMJJASOND 2012-JFMAMJJASOND 2013-JFMAMJJASOND 2014-JFMAMJJASOND 2015-JFMAMJJASOND 2016-1stQ2ndQ3rdQ4thQ 2017-1stQ2ndQ3rdQ4thQ 2018-1stQ2ndQ3rdQ4thQ 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

This user is one of the 40 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there and hope the New Year starts well for you.

I've just opened a peer review request for George Town, Penang here: Wikipedia:Peer review/George Town, Penang/archive3, having substantially rewritten the article & improved sourcing with the aim of elevating it to FA. I found your name on the volunteers list & wondering if you're keen to help in its review? Many thanks! hundenvonPG (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have signed up to help with things in Chicago and Buffalo, New York. This is a place that I am not familiar with.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I hadn't noticed it. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

• Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
• The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

---

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 36,068 views (1,502.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same location pictured as 2019. - Thanks for this great article and many more! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Today a friend's birthday, with related music and new vacation pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Eustace Tilley! That was a fun read. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elle Leonard you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Elle Leonard for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WaggersTALK 00:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf Point Towers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tony, I posted about your Wikipedia work on Twitter/X and a lot of people are saying nice things such as "wiki editors are truly one of the few things keeping my faith in humanity alive atm" and "Genuinely inspiring. Dude has it figured out. What a wonderful way to live". Thought you might want to know! Thanks for all you do here. Annierau (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The appreciation is really cool. Sometimes, I run into some depressing obstacles in the wiki beauracracy. I do a lot of work and don't always get a positive spin with my efforts. This is a pleasant reminder that people use wikipedia and have fun learning about it. There are a lot of cool characters on WP. That has like 13k likes and 1k retweets. You have now surpassed Alexandra Daddario as the person who has gotten me the most engagements on social media. About 10 years ago she retweeted a picture of a bunny that I took because she liked bunnies on social (like some people like cat videos) back then. Last I looked I had like 150 or 200 followers. Now, I am at over 600. Wow. I need you on my PR team. Thank you so much.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Annierau, I am just realizing that your X post has had 409.5K views. Amazing. That is by a mile the most I have ever had.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So glad you appreciate it! I've always found it unfortunate that Wikipedia editors rarely get feedback from the typical readers — people who generally have very nice things to say (unlike the vocal minority of people that fine a way to complain about, well, everything)! I know that people don't edit Wikipedia for fame or glory, but a little bit of encouragement goes a long way :-) Annierau (talk) 00:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Annierau, I was hoping you might be able to do the same thing for me on Instagram, but as I look at https://www.instagram.com/depthsofwikipedia/, I see that you focus on actual wikipedia entries there. Well, I will have to figure out how to get some follower growth over there on my own, unless you have some advice.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you added the details many years ago, did you have a copy of the NRHP nomination form? I can't seem to find one online. APK hi :-) (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oop, found it here. Sorry to bug you. APK hi :-) (talk) 10:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elle Leonard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joanne McCarthy (basketball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 14:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Series of Poker bracelet has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
67		MaxPreps (talk)	Add sources
39		14th century in literature (talk)	Add sources
1,239		Petrarch (talk)	Add sources
12		The Filocolo (talk)	Add sources
33		Il pirata (talk)	Add sources
163		Carry That Weight (talk)	Add sources
1,286		Marques Brownlee (talk)	Cleanup
15		Normal Community High School (talk)	Cleanup
96		Prime Prep Academy (talk)	Cleanup
20		1989–90 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team (talk)	Expand
43		Pittsburgh Technical College (talk)	Expand
10		1975–76 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team (talk)	Expand
952		The Decameron (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
34		The Tale of Melibee (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
103		Black people and early Mormonism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10		Diablo Canyon earthquake vulnerability (talk)	Merge
13		2007 Pacific hurricane season (talk)	Merge
83		Logical order of God's decrees (talk)	Merge
1,501		Tom Scott (YouTuber) (talk)	Wikify
3		Match Me in London (talk)	Wikify
6		Nike Summer League (talk)	Wikify
2		Lisa Ryckbosch (talk)	Orphan
13		American Lullaby (talk)	Orphan
4		Nadia Lipes (talk)	Orphan
2		Astarto (Bononcini) (talk)	Stub
19		Andy Greer (talk)	Stub
144		Suo Gân (talk)	Stub
2		Adelaide (Sartorio) (talk)	Stub
15		Elegia di Madonna Fiammetta (talk)	Stub
25		Alfredrick Hughes (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

---

Did you intend to add this to Level 4? I tried to move it myself to Level 5, but I don't have extended confermed rights. --Makkool (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC),[reply]

• I must have looked up an article to find the subsection and found a level-4 article.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for improving the vital article "Campbell's Soup Cans" significantly! The person who loves reading (talk) 18:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks for promoting the level-4 vital article "Campbell's Soup Cans" to good article status! The person who loves reading (talk) 18:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 176.29.110.78 (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elle Leonard you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Elle Leonard for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some weird errors, and I don't have time to check what happened, but paradiplomacy discussion was deleted and millenium goals is duplicated... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll look into it.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Piotrus I seem to have split a discussion with another. Now fixed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Vital Barnstar
		You deserve this for converting all four subpages to chronological order by yourself. I imagine it was not easy. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:QuicoleJR I have been coveting the vital barnstar. Thank you so much. I hope I did not mess anything up to much in the conversion.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TonyTheTiger, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. Unfortunately, Template:Did you know nominations/Campbell's Soup Cans is not eligible for DYK points because it was nominated to DYK as a newly promoted GA. I know this can be disappointing, but Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#Did you know? states that only newly created or expanded DYKs are eligible for DYK points. The rules specifically exclude DYK submissions from receiving points if their appearance on DYK is solely because the article was a newly promoted GA. Epicgenius (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Epicgenius Wow. That severely impacts my CUP strategy and greatly demotivates me from improving a bunch of Princeton and Michigan basketball season articles. I doubt I will be 5x any of them. But, hey, thems the rules.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a judge, but you could still get points for the GAs themselves if they are within the eligible timeframe. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Big Ten Athlete of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SportsGuy789 (talk) 05:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Garrett Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

• Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
• Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
• Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
• MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
• Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
528		Poptropica (talk)	Add sources
74		Trent Tucker Rule (talk)	Add sources
108		Twenty-one (basketball) (talk)	Add sources
32		2017–18 Brooklyn Nets season (talk)	Add sources
133		2022 Michigan Wolverines football team (talk)	Add sources
161		Six-on-six basketball (talk)	Add sources
159		National Basketball Association criticisms and controversies (talk)	Cleanup
23		Marvelwood School (talk)	Cleanup
36		Darrow School (talk)	Cleanup
35		1988–89 New York Knicks season (talk)	Expand
239		1993–94 Chicago Bulls season (talk)	Expand
9,485		COVID-19 pandemic (talk)	Expand
10		Chicago Math and Science Academy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
72		Findlay Prep (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
147		Volleyball variations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
87		Girdle of Thomas (talk)	Merge
44		Tornado outbreak of April 19–20, 2023 (talk)	Merge
240		Khokhar (talk)	Merge
48		Basketball playbook (talk)	Wikify
15		Chicago Annenberg Challenge (talk)	Wikify
37		St. Luke's School (Connecticut) (talk)	Wikify
2		Amelia Gillespie Smyth (talk)	Orphan
3		Ad Plumbaria (talk)	Orphan
2		Chinorotwittayalai school (talk)	Orphan
15		National Basketball Coaches Association (talk)	Stub
13		Rebound rate (talk)	Stub
5		Wojciech Kamiński (talk)	Stub
15		Offense efficiency rating (talk)	Stub
4		Ed Earle (talk)	Stub
14		Larry Coon (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Gary Bossert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 02:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
• Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

Technical news

• The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

• The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.

---

Hello! Your submission of Billy Garrett Jr. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sims2aholic8 (talk) 13:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Since you're the director for the Chicago WikiProject, just wanted to let you know that Jamie Kalven will be TFA on March 16. Thanks so much for your help on the FAC.

Also, I have another Chicago-related article at FAC: Illinois Public Access Opinion 16-006. You can comment on the FAC here. Thanks again for all the work you do! Edge3 (talk) 05:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Edge3, I am more like director emeritus.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Oh interesting. You're still listed as a director on the wikiproject page. Has someone else taken over? Edge3 (talk) 01:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony. I managed to find the template containing that language you mentioned at AN and wikilinked it. Easier than waiting for the bureaucracy to get around to it. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 01:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Balph Eubank-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Andrew Dakich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 03:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2010–2019 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show models has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 16:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2000–2009 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show models has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 16:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1995–1999 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show models has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 16:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony, I don't believe there's any current formal policy on this, so absolutely feel free to ignore this message. However, as one of the GA backlog drive coordinators, I noticed our numbers were heading backwards this week, and wondered why - and then I saw your recent nominations. You have almost 70 nominations currently active on the GAN page! I wonder if you could hold off on further nominations until the bulk of these have been reviewed, or at least until the end of the GA backlog drive on April 1st. This is just a personal request, not related to any rule or policy - but hope you will consider it. Thanks for your many GA reviews and articles over the years. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ganesha811, I am participating in WP:CUP, I have a pretty low success rate at FAC, so I need to wind up dozens of GAs in the queue to have date priority position so that in the rounds where I need a lot of points, I can get lots of GA points. I am willing to stop nominating new articles until April 1 if you can promise that there will be another backlog drive in October.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't promise that, especially since it isn't up to just me. However, I certainly support another GA backlog drive pretty soon after this one, since we have made only moderate progress so far this month. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony, I noticed the same thing as Ganesha did above. Speaking as a regular editor, rather than as a WikiCup judge, I have to say that, unfortunately, some of your most recent GANs have issues that may make them liable to a fail or even a quickfail. Here's a sampling of what I'm talking about:

• Steven Hoggett - this article has four sections, one of which (Personal life) is a single sentence that is completely unsourced (and is tagged with {{cn}}). The Early Life section is just three sentences, and most of the article is about his career. A reviewer might point out that the article fails GA criteria 3a (broadness) and 2b (sourcing).
• Pilot and Chapter Two - the production section is just one sentence long, and it lacks any info about background or themes (for comparison, have a look at articles like Faces (Star Trek: Voyager) or Gender Bender (The X-Files)). A reviewer might point out that the article fails GA criterion 3a.
• A Christmas Story: The Musical - the article lacks citations in several places, and it also lacks info about reception - there are just two reviews, whereas for a Broadway musical you can usually find 4-5 good reviews just about the Broadway run (and, potentially, other reviews about the runs in each of the other cities). A reviewer might point out that the article fails GA criteria 3a and 2b.
• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - I just removed your GA nomination for this article because it has at least three maintenance tags and multiple pieces of unsourced information (failing GA criterion 2b). In addition, the history section seems heavily weighted in favor of the agency's first four years, failing criterion 4. There is a standalone controversies section with four very detailed sections about past controversies, but controversy sections are best avoided per WP:CSECTION.

As a WikiCup judge, I should mention that I need to wind up dozens of GAs in the queue to have date priority position so that in the rounds where I need a lot of points, I can get lots of GA points. could be considered gaming the system. If you are submitting subpar GANs so you can gain more points in future rounds, then these articles are liable to be ineligible for points (per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#General rules: "All reviewed content must have been worked on significantly by you to receive points. ... If this is abused, the judges reserve the right to not award points."). There is no time limit on GANs. The probability of them being reviewed does not increase substantially when you nominate dozens of articles at once, because if you have more than 20 GANs, the additional GANs will be hidden from potential reviewers.

This is surprising given your track record of successful GA nominations. I highly encourage you to take a look at the GACR criteria again, then go through all of the articles you just nominated and see if any of these articles still need work to meet the GA criteria. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Epicgenius, I do not intend to abuse the system. I am actually working through a list of several hundred DYKs that I have had since I last entered the CUP in 2010. I am trying to figure out which are within striking distance of GA. I have a spreadsheet with two lists. I am only nominating those on the good list. Some of those may need a bit of work, but for the most part I don't think they are in quickfail range. If so, I should be quickfailing some of the ones I am reviewing. Surely, 90% of the nominees that I have posted would be considered suitable nominees by most reviewers. Further, it is my understanding that the GANs continue to accrue date priority while hidden. As the visible ones get reviewed, I believe the newly revealed one will be in better position to attract reviewers.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining your thought process. If you are nominating old articles for GA, however, I'd suggest looking through them carefully to make sure they don't have obvious issues (like breadth of coverage or maintenance tags). This would help weed out some of the articles with more serious issues, especially as you haven't edited some of them in years; for example, the CFPB page has undergone quite a few changes since you last modified it. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ganesha811, Epicgenius, and BlueMoonset:, Thanks for checking in. I will try to be more careful with my remaining strategic nominations. Unless, I can count on an October backlog drive, I don't think I should stop nominations. What if there is a September drive. I need to make sure things are nominated in time for a 180 day bonus to kick in with time remaining to review. I apologize for the problems I caused the backlog drive results. I would be willing to allow your to remove all the {{GA nominee}} templates of all hidden nominations until April 1 if that would make the backlog look good. They would have to be restored with the current date priority info on April 1 though.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  My main issue is that these mass nominations may be unscrupulous, as seen in the articles I mentioned above. For me, the primary problem is not the backlog number or the fact that you didn't wait until April 1 to nominate the articles. The problem is that, of the articles you nominated, some of them seem to be nowhere near GA status (the CFPB article being one of the clearest examples of this). It's better to ensure that your articles are up to GA standards the first time around, rather than nominating a slate of articles at once and seeing what sticks. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I second this. I've skimmed through all of your nominations, and for what it's worth, I believe that 22 (a third of them) have major issues which could result in a fail or even a QF. I don't doubt that these could get to GA with a good push, but I feel that this many of this quality is too much. I suggest denominating the articles that seem further off from the GAC; it would save you and your reviewers' time! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Most of my GAs are sports, visual arts or Chicago related stuff, so my calibration may be off in other fields, but that number seems a little high.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Perhaps, but I'd at least leave it at "major issues". I could give a quick rundown if you'd like, but I hope you understand our sentiment.

And of course, a lot of the articles (especially the basketball bios) look quite alright! Either way, I respect your commitment to all of these noms and wish you good luck with the WikiCup! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My personal suggestion would be to take it slowly. Like you, Tony, I have a backlog of about 150 GA-ready pages, but I never have substantially more than 20 nominations at any one time, and I try to have a selection of nominations that is a representative slice of everything I do. It makes a big difference. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Holy hell, I didn't notice this response before. I would be willing to allow your to remove all the templates of all hidden nominations until April 1 if that would make the backlog look good. They would have to be restored with the current date priority info on April 1 though. What entitles you to make these demands? Who do you think you are, Jimbo Wales? – Teratix ₵ 16:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i can see you've nominated 6 more articles for GA today, including Mekia Cox, which (from what i can tell) you haven't edited since 2017 and which cites IMDb, and The Firm (2012 TV series), which you haven't edited since 2016 and which cites not only IMDb but also facebook. please slow down with the nominations, and do your due diligence in working on the articles you nominate. thanks, sawyer * he/they * talk 21:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tony, it is absolutely an abuse of other editors time and energy to mass-nominate a bunch of articles – many of which are old and have existing issues – just so you can get points in a game. And saying you will refrain from nominating more, but only if Ganesha can promise you there will be another backlog drive for you to exploit in October? The level of entitlement to other peoples' time and effort you're exhibiting here is fucking staggering. An editor with your level of tenure and experience ought to know better. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging WP:WIKICUP judges Cwmhiraeth, Frostly, and repinging Epicgenius. Based on recent behavior, TonyTheTiger is not going to stop this flood of nominations unless told to do so, and far too many of the GA nominations so far have been of articles that are far from meeting the GA criteria, if they're being quickfailed. As PMC notes, that's not fair to regular editors who spend time to review them when they could be improving Wikipedia with that time. The nominating instructions are very clear: Ensure that the article meets Wikipedia policies and guidelines as expected of any article, including neutral point of view, verifiability, no original research, and notability. Then check the article against the good article criteria and make any improvements that you think are necessary. This should be done for every single article prior to nomination, and if it had been, many of these nominations would not have been made, or would have been delayed while the articles were improved to meet the criteria. Also, even though he's working through a list of several hundred DYKs that I have had since I last entered the CUP in 2010, just because it was once a DYK doesn't mean that he's a significant contributor to the article—as witness Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella (Beane musical), which he originally nominated at DYK but did not create and only made a dozen minor edits—and should not be nominating those articles at GAN given the recent changes to GAN rules. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    i've just quickfailed Mekia Cox, which not only cites IMDb, but also a forum post from 2010. this is completely disruptive and taking up reviewers' time when we could be reviewing articles that had the absolute bare minimum amount of attention paid to them before nomination, or working on our own projects. i'm frustrated, to say the least. sawyer * he/they * talk 00:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the ping @BlueMoonset. I mentioned a sampling of the issues above, and I recommended that Tony go through all of these nominations to see if they actually meet the standards. Judging by the fact that some of these nominations have just been quickfailed, I'm not confident that this has been done.

    Tony, I strongly encourage you to go back and double check all of your remaining nominations to see if they meet the GA criteria. From the looks of it, you are nominating articles that you haven't edited in years, so it's hard to determine whether you can vouch for the quality of these articles. I suggest you double check these nominations as soon as you can. Epicgenius (talk) 01:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I just quickfailed three sports submissions, and I think a half dozen more probably qualify in that section as well. To echo Premeditated Chaos, Tony, I'll be blunt: making dozens of spurious GA nominations at once – saddling down the system just to game the WikiCup – is a cut-and-dry case of disruptive editing (not to wildly inconsiderate to everyone else in the GA process), and continuing to engage in it will result in a block. It is absolutely disruptive to make a small number of relatively minor additions to an article and renominate it after it was quickfailed, without even coming close to addressing all of the concerns, as you did at Michael Schofield (American football). Epicgenius is right: you need to go through your nominations and withdraw everything but the ones that are actually reasonably close to good-article status, and then we can talk about whether we still need to space them out. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm stunned by Michael Schofield (American football). Two quickfails in under ten hours? -- asilvering (talk) 04:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I apologize that I have not participated in this discussion in a while but I was noticing the reviews below and not noticing up here. There is certainly an active effort to remove a lot of the nominations. I can see clearly that some are weak. Mostly those outside my stated areas of editorial expertise above. However, there is also a lot of exaggerating going on regarding what is far from WP:WIAGA. E.g., compare Michael Schofield (American football) to the most recent WP:GA sports and recreation promotion other than my articles Jerry Atkinson (American football). The current version of Schofield not remotely in quickfail territory. Overzealous posse of editors is simply over reacting. This is WP:GAN is not WP:FAC and there seems to be a largescale effort to require me to attain a closer than normal proximity to WIAGA all of a sudden. Most experts can talk me into submission on some of the media topics, but I am quite expert on sports GACs and I know Schofields article is better than most offensive linemen on WP. Failing this a second time was clear lack of understanding of what proximity to WIAGA is. Calm down and stop quickfailing stuff for no reason, There is no requirement that 100% of a persons nomination need to be promoted. If you fail a 20-25% of my articles that does not make me a problem editor.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You're an experienced editor, you know how talk pages work. It makes no sense that you wouldn't have been checking this section for responses, given that it was an active discussion about your behavior. I frankly don't believe that you somehow didn't see them.

  That aside, this response is utterly tone-deaf and fails to actually address the breadth of issues people have brought up with these nominations. If a dozen people are pointing out problems with your behavior and your nominations, it might just be that there is a problem! That you have the audacity to say things like Calm down and stop quickfailing stuff for no reason...If you fail a 20-25% of my articles that does not make me a problem editor. is just incredible to me. Not a single one of those quickfails was for no reason. And it does make you a problem editor if you nominate 70+ articles en masse solely because you want WikiCup points on a schedule that suits you. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It seems Tony had had this problem of thinking WP is there for his benefit for a long time. Back in 2011, Tony was topic-banned from the featured sounds and from "uploading images about himself". The reason for the first of these TBANs was, and I quote, for:

  TonyTheTiger nominates anything that he thinks will have a remote change of passing, ignoring negative responses, fighting back his nominations are closed as unsuccessful, and generally clogging FS with items that don't deserve to be featured. Until TTT is made to understand that he cannot ignore what other people are saying, and that Featured Sounds exists for more than just to fill the trophy wall that is his userpage, I believe that he is harmful to the process.

  What goes around comes around, eh? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  There's also the following, from the same discussion:

  he seems unable to understand the ways in which he disrupts and abuses of processes and other editors' time in his goal of promoting himself. Last year, he disrupted DYK in his attempt to win WikiCup, there was an issue at TFA/R, and FAC instituted a special rule to limit repeat noms because of his repeatedly using FAC as Peer review for ill-prepared articles, and bringing back ill-prepared noms the minute the previous one was archived.

  It's sad to see that such an experienced old hand can't move on from the disruptive habits that got him into trouble in the past. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who is a neutral party (not in the wikicup this year), and who has done his share of sports nominations and reviews in the past, I 100% agree on the quick fails just from eyeballing a handful of them (Irwin, Demens, and Hudson are nowhere close to GA). You'rs focusing on how fast he can write things to send to GA rather than actually focusing on making good articles, and it's entirely against the spirit of the Wikicup, and for that matter, GAN. I've reviewed legitimately good articles from you in the past (Cato June comes to mind), so you can make proper good articles, you would just rather apparently do the minimum to get the badge/points/whatever, and that's a significant problem. Wizardman 14:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wizardman, I am sure you are aware that if an Offensive lineman is not a Pro Bowl caliber player, they don't get much press. Neither Heath Irwin nor Michael Schofield (American football) has any significant content missing. The fact that the articles are not expansive does not mean that they do not cover the topic with adequate breadth. I have not looked closely at some of the others, but neither of those two is missing anything that is very encyclopedic, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While true, there are still things that can be added that would help with adding context and understanding where the player was at in their career. To use Heath Irwin as an example, did he have a draft projection? What were his contracts that he signed? Since he was a spot starter in his career, were those 29 games all in a couple seasons or was he a spot starter due to a guard's injury or ineffectiveness? Did he just play guard or did they throw him elsewhere on the line, which we know happens rather frequently with non-stars? Did any of his coaches have projections on him especially early on? It's little things like that that, to me, encapsulate the difference between a Good Article and an alright one (coincidentally enough a lot of that info is in Schofield, so maybe a qf on that one wasn't ideal). In fact, to answer my very own question above, since he started most games in 1999 then joined the Dolphins I imagine there has to be an article or two on that as to what happened there. Wizardman 15:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wizardman and regarding Demens and Hudson, they may have been predominately special teams (non-returner non-placekicker) contributors, so they may be at about the same level of press exposure as linemen, if not lower.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll say that I'm not quite sure I agree with some of the quickfails (Michael Schofield doesn't look that bad IMO) – but Tony, you really should be cautious about what articles you're nominating and make sure they're of very high quality, especially if they're things you haven't edited in years. Just my two cents. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Administrative action is appropriate at this point, since this apparently won't stop otherwise. In addition to frivolous re-nominations that have continued after all of the above warnings, we have these:
  • Complained about the quickfails at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup#Open season on qfing me, saying There is an overzealous posse of editors quickfailing my articles.
  • Left a harassing message for a reviewer at User talk:Teratix#Heath Irwin review, saying I assume you are lieing to pick a fight. Is that your intention.
  • Attacked the reviewer at Talk:Michael Schofield (American football)/GA2, saying many of the fails are pure vindictive frustration by a posse of GA reviewers looking hard for stuff to quibble with and You are bending over backwards to fail this article. No one who knows football would consider this far from a GA. Maybe stay in your lane in a field you know. Of course, one of the main benefits of GA is that it allows for occasional feedback from someone not involved in the topic area.
  • Participated in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2024#Reason for "backward" progress, responding to claims of not being a significant contributor with Bold-faced lie. Every one of my GAN submissions is from my own WP:DYK submissions. PLease point out an article that I don't have any edits on? because there were significant contributions, they were just from many years ago (sometimes over a decade).

There might be more, but these are the ones I found. If polite requests aren't going to work and warnings aren't going to work, then the community is going to have to find a solution that will. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The renominations Heath Irwin, Michael Schofield (American football), Kenny Demens, 1000M were all after addressing the failing concerns.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  you clearly did not address all of the failing concerns, though. Schofield & 1000M were both quickfailed again because the new reviewers felt you did not adequately address the concerns of the first quickfails (regardless of how unfair you believe the QF of Schofield was). sawyer * he/they * talk 20:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  i'll also note that @Theleekycauldron put the possibility of a block on the table last night, and after her comment, you've renominated at least three articles, one of which resulted in two quickfails in a single day. sawyer * he/they * talk 20:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I stand by my quick fail of the first Schofield GAN, and wasn't aware that you had issues with it Tony. If you'd like to discuss my review please get in touch. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Malcolm (Macbeth) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention and Talk:Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Malcolm (Macbeth) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Malcolm (Macbeth) and Talk:Malcolm (Macbeth)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jordan Murphy (basketball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jordan Murphy (basketball) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jordan Murphy (basketball) and Talk:Jordan Murphy (basketball)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season and Talk:2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same logic, incidentally, seems like it goes for the other Big Ten Conference season nominations you have at WP:GAN, so I would recommend withdrawing the lot and working on them. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chris Hill (basketball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chris Hill (basketball) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chris Hill (basketball) and Talk:Chris Hill (basketball)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Malcolm (Macbeth) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Malcolm (Macbeth) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Christmas Story: The Musical you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that you nominated the article Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella (Beane musical) for Good article status. You do not appear to have made significant edits to the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. Current practice is that only editors who have significantly contributed to the article are able to nominate it (see the nomination instructions). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. Ssilvers has contributed more than half of the article and And1987 has contributed about a quarter of it, but I see you have only contributed to 4% of the article and all of your edits were made over a decade ago! Please talk to them about this before reopening the nomination. -- Grnrchst (talk) 13:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Peter Patton (basketball) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 19:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jordan Murphy (basketball) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jordan Murphy (basketball) for comments about the article, and Talk:Jordan Murphy (basketball)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Michael Schofield (American football) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Schofield (American football) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Michael Schofield (American football) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Steven Hoggett you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Steven Hoggett for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christine Jorgensen Reveals you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Christine Jorgensen Reveals for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article L. J. Peak you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:L. J. Peak for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Old Nassau you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Old Nassau for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Water by the Spoonful you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Water by the Spoonful for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mekia Cox you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer-mcdonell -- Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pilot and Chapter Two you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pilot and Chapter Two for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Firm (2012 TV series) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Firm (2012 TV series) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mekia Cox you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mekia Cox for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer-mcdonell -- Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1 (2013 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Geardona -- Geardona (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Calico Joe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Geardona -- Geardona (talk) 01:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article United Nations Honour Flag you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:United Nations Honour Flag for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Racketeer (novel) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Racketeer (novel) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 01:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1 (2013 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1 (2013 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Geardona -- Geardona (talk) 01:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hands on a Hardbody (musical) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hands on a Hardbody (musical) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Calico Joe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Calico Joe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Geardona -- Geardona (talk) 01:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Michael Schofield (American football) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Khaleke Hudson you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Khaleke Hudson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Theleekycauldron -- Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Will Hagerup you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Will Hagerup for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Theleekycauldron -- Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kenny Demens you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kenny Demens for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Theleekycauldron -- Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Schofield (American football) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Michael Schofield (American football) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 04:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Humble and Kind you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Humble and Kind for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 04:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article In a World... you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:In a World... and Talk:In a World.../GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 07:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heath Irwin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Heath Irwin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 13:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1000M you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1000M for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article David Bailey (basketball) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:David Bailey (basketball) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matt Howard you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Matt Howard for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 16:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lucky Guy (play) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lucky Guy (play) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heath Irwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Standard-Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1000M you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1000M for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kenny Demens you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kenny Demens for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to 1000M has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I were you, I would withdraw every GA nomination made in the past 10 days as a sign of good faith and withdraw from the WikiCup, possibly on an indefinite basis. That would at least show that you understand that consensus is unanimously against your actions. Otherwise, I don't know in what direction the ANI thread will go. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tony, you're in a bad position here, a really deep hole. I'd follow the recommendation given by AirshipJungleman29 above, if I were you. I've read Talk:Heath Irwin/GA1, and frankly I agree with it. starship.paint (RUN) 13:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Omameh has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. – Teratix ₵ 02:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article House of Cards (season 3) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:House of Cards (season 3) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Czar -- Czar (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Robinson III has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 13:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tony, I'm letting you know that I have withdrawn you from the WikiCup. Several users have complained about your conduct both at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup#Open season on qfing me and at ANI, and a complete WikiCup topic ban is currently being discussed at ANI. Unfortunately, this means it is no longer feasible for you to continue competing in the Cup this year. I have left your name on the WikiCup newsletter list for now, but if the topic ban is enacted, please note that I will have to remove your name from the list of subscribers as well. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olivia Olson (basketball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 16:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This looks as though it is no longer a draft. But it is still entitled "Draft ..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/key/Draft:Alia_Fischer 2603:7000:2101:AA00:49A4:5A2D:528C:D8E4 (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) The name is where the content is. If content is at Draft: then it is in the Draft namespace. It just doesn't have {{draft}} at the top. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks .. but then how does one propose it for consideration as an article? Or is that not possible. It seems to reflect notability. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:49A4:5A2D:528C:D8E4 (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, TonyTheTiger is developing this content in a draft and will eventually publish it to the main namespace when it is ready. Tony is an exceptionally well-accomplished Wikipedian and knows what they are doing. No one needs to sift through content in the draft or user spaces to "propose it for consideration as an article". Editors develop content and publish it themselves or, in some cases, creates a draft and then asks for a review which is when someone at Articles for Creation examines it. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.--2603:7000:2101:AA00:3447:1095:B3A0:C8B0 (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Olivia Olson (basketball) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Olivia Olson (basketball) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are interested in articles dealing with Chicago athletes, you may be interested in Draft:Danny Wolf. Have a great week. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:3447:1095:B3A0:C8B0 (talk) 21:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Peter Patton (basketball) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the well thought-out statement. I'm glad because when you said you'd put up a statement in six hours I thought that maybe "they" had pushed you to the point of retirement, and thank Zeus that this wasn't the case. I enjoyed your comments about competition and its place on Wikipedia, and am sure that you are the only editor who has the spirit of competition in the Cup and glad that that's no longer a factor by anyone involved in the contest /s. In summary, I'm glad that this kind of thing rolls off your back like edits off a duck. And since I don't come by often, thanks for all the things you've done, especially for your work on Wikipedia's Chicago collection (probably the best existing collection on the subject). Randy Kryn (talk) 13:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Randy Kryn, Thanks for dropping by with kind thoughts. Your 16:08, 8 September 2018 tiger submission above is a memorable one.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kind thoughts not enough (cakes and cookies and dance music might be a good beginning for all you've done here). Coming to the North American Wikipedia Conference in October? And thanks for the reminder, so I've added the painting to the Tiger page (edit: since reverted). Randy Kryn (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just my way of saying that I don't like pile ons, which occur too often at the incidents board. Even long after the person that the editors are concerned about admits their errors and takes steps to correct them. It's not like what you were doing was a yearly occurrence. Then you principally wrote a classic, to coin a term, in a long post discussing your thought process as it related to each step of your editing. It will be interesting to see what logic is applied for your punishment after all of that. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You apology tour, not enough. A hair shirt may be the only remedy. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mayor's Office Festivals Billboard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tony, saw your Rockwell Four Freedoms box at Wikipedia:Featured topics/Four Freedoms, and thought that it might be expanded to encompass the entire topic, Four Freedoms. Can envision what a powerful navbox it could be. What do you think? I was surprised the full topic didn't already have a navbox, seems a natural. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Randy Kryn, I believe that would be a different topic.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Not really, as the painting series would be included under an art section, and the navbox would also have the speech and all the trimmings (per category:Four Freedoms) and even be included on FDR's page. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just learned that Roosevelt himself commissioned a monument to the Four Freedoms. Never knew that, he was seriously into the concept. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That FDR commissioned it may be inaccurate per the sources. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can request clarification on the delineation of the domain of a topic. Sometimes one topic is a subtopic of another topic as I understand it. I think Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates is where such issues are discussed nowadays.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If Roosevelt commissioning the statue is incorrect we shouldn't have it on the page. I just added the funding organization per the links. I'm just talking about a navbox, not a reclassification of the topic. I'll work one up later to see what it looks like. Anyway, if a good navbox comes together am glad some attention was moved onto your overall work. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Randy Kryn, what are you saying you added? where?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added "and was funded by the Women's National Institute" at Four Freedoms Monument. Per the sources. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,250		Horizon League (talk)	Add sources
41		Mother McAuley Liberal Arts High School (talk)	Add sources
3		2013–14 UIC Flames men's basketball team (talk)	Add sources
50		Out of bounds (talk)	Add sources
48		University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis (talk)	Add sources
2,136		Charlie's Angels (talk)	Add sources
139		Ball (gridiron football) (talk)	Cleanup
65		Jake Ryan (American football) (talk)	Cleanup
380		All-America (talk)	Cleanup
50		Todd Fuller (talk)	Expand
152		1991–92 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team (talk)	Expand
139		Homelessness in the United States by state (talk)	Expand
34		Chicago Catholic League (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
79		Coaching tree (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
74		Slotback (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
21		Halfback (Canadian football) (talk)	Merge
61		Running up the score (talk)	Merge
11		Chillicothe Gazette (talk)	Merge
45		Ryan Clady (talk)	Wikify
197		NBA criticisms and controversies (talk)	Wikify
395		Mid-major (talk)	Wikify
2		Chia-Li Chen (talk)	Orphan
4		Bats & Mice (talk)	Orphan
2		Bashir Taraki (talk)	Orphan
58		Robert Jones (offensive lineman) (talk)	Stub
277		Tony Stubblefield (talk)	Stub
226		Sarah Strange (talk)	Stub
28		John Matocha (talk)	Stub
6		Kyle Roberts (talk)	Stub
9		George Uko (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Todd Leslie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louie Caporusso has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 21:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thom Darden has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 15:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Hill (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All-Big Ten.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

---

The article In a World... you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:In a World... for comments about the article, and Talk:In a World.../GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article A Christmas Story: The Musical you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A Christmas Story: The Musical for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed your reversion of my closure on your peer review for Campbell's Soup Cans. You didn't explain why you've done so on your comment about it. According to the review closure policy, "Every editor is invited to close inactive discussions." Your peer review should be closed because of rule 3 (it's older than a month with no responses), so why did you revert my closure?

Cheers, TheWikiToby (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Virginia cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Texas cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tennessee cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ohio cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New York cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Jersey cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Missouri cities and mayors of over 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Michigan cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Louisiana cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indiana cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Illinois cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Georgia (U.S. state) cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Florida cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Colorado cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arizona cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the AN thread about your conduct in the WikiCup and at GAN, and you are now subject to the following topic bans:

• Indefinite ban from participating in the WikiCup
• Indefinite one-nomination limit for GAN

You may appeal these restrictions at AN after one year. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given your topic ban, I've also removed your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send, as per my comment above regarding this matter. I wish you the best of luck in your other endeavors on Wikipedia. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingenuity: Tony's nominations Talk:Chris Hill (basketball)/GA1, Talk:2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season/GA1, Talk:Joanne McCarthy (basketball)/GA1, and Tony's review Talk:Wait a Minute (The Pussycat Dolls song)/GA3 are still active. All these began before the ANI thread started. Could you clarify whether these are carve-outs to the current topic ban? After all the topic ban is meant to stop future disruption. starship.paint (RUN) 13:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint: I told Tony that they could keep open any nominations that are currently under review (though they will need to wait for these reviews to finish before nominating any others). It seems unfair to the reviewers to close those reviews prematurely and waste their efforts. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ingenuity: - thank you for your kind consideration! starship.paint (RUN) 14:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AirshipJungleman29, GhostRiver, and MrHyacinth: - notifying you of the above in case you do not wish to proceed. starship.paint (RUN) 13:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per this diff, I don't think GhostRiver will be returning to complete Talk:Joanne McCarthy (basketball)/GA1 any time soon Starship.paint; personally, I am happy to complete the reviews I am currently doing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starship.paint As AirshipJungleman29 indicated, I will not be able to complete the review. My bipolar disorder has made it very hard to function on most days, and working in quieter areas of Wikispace is about all I can muster. Apologies for the inconvenience. — GhostRiver 01:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: - apologies, I did not know of your situation. I wish you well, may the situation improve for you as soon as possible. starship.paint (RUN) 02:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. It's fine - the reviewer can continue with the review. MrHyacinth (talk) 23:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chris Hill (basketball) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chris Hill (basketball) for comments about the article, and Talk:Chris Hill (basketball)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2018–19 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joanne McCarthy (basketball) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joanne McCarthy (basketball) for comments about the article, and Talk:Joanne McCarthy (basketball)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the one-at-a-time GA restriction. That seems an overreaction to an experienced editor getting competitive during a contest. Most of your GAs have met the bar, you've done hundreds of reviews, and that recent review of the synchronistic 3:16 game was in-depth for a niche topic. Feel free to cite this message or the barnstar below when/if you appeal the limit. And, in general, good luck, Rjj (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The GA barnstar
		For continuing to create and review Good Articles, and handling rough times with poise. Rjj (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Gatoclass 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Gatoclass 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024–25 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,868		Big Ten Conference (talk)	Add sources
1,554		Atlantic Coast Conference (talk)	Add sources
45		Ohio Christian University (talk)	Add sources
227		Southwest Conference (talk)	Add sources
1,519		Pac-12 Conference (talk)	Add sources
26		Lincoln Christian University (talk)	Add sources
16		Prairie College (talk)	Cleanup
76		Multnomah University (talk)	Cleanup
62		George School (talk)	Cleanup
3		2018 Michigan State Spartans men's soccer team (talk)	Expand
477		U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking (talk)	Expand
28		University of Arkansas Grantham (talk)	Expand
2,539		Decathlon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,405		Letter case (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
16		Aggieville (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
157		Bethel University (Minnesota) (talk)	Merge
95		Mischief Night (talk)	Merge
84		Impressum (talk)	Merge
93		Vince Williams Jr. (talk)	Wikify
10		Tennessee Volunteers women's rowing (talk)	Wikify
21		History of Wichita, Kansas (talk)	Wikify
2		Château de Tustal (talk)	Orphan
3		Anjum Ayaz (talk)	Orphan
7		Atdmt (talk)	Orphan
19		Central Baptist College (talk)	Stub
13		Oklahoma Baptist Bison (talk)	Stub
12		Sports information director (talk)	Stub
36		Zack Clayton (talk)	Stub
18		Big 12 Conference softball tournament (talk)	Stub
5		Sarah Gibson (swimmer) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You added a named reference here to 2011–12 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season, but it wasn't defined with a full citation. Thanks in advance for fixing this cite error. Isaidnoway (talk) 03:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Isaidnoway, typo fixed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.

Technical news

• Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!

---

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the March 2024 GA backlog drive. Your contribution (3 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony. I have no personal passion around creating the missing women's players on Chicago Tribune Silver Basketball. I don't mind if you do or don't create them, I'm just throwing it out there in case, as it seems you may have more passion around the Big Ten than me. SportsGuy789 (talk) 18:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:SportsGuy789, I think WP:CBBALL needs to start promoting improving all Female conference POY templates by creating redlinks. Mention this there.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I hear ya, the women's game is under-represented. My personal opinion is that we should focus on knocking out all men's CPOYs before dividing already-limited resources. Creating good articles is a time consuming process, and we've been plugging away at the men's side since 2006. We're under 100 total red links remaining, which is incredible, but I'd still rather see the men's article be blue than the women's (for now). Once WP:CBBALL knocks out most of the redlinks from the CPOY and national award winner articles, I'll be personally more inclined to work on the women's. SportsGuy789 (talk) 18:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • User:SportsGuy789, I enjoy the men's game more and thus enjoy researching the players more. However, since I like to research U of Michigan, Chicago Area, Western New York, Princeton University athletes, I would rather handle a female of one of those than an Ohio State Chicago Tribune Silver Basketball winner. The Joanne McCarthy (basketball) article that is currently on the main page was a fun Chicago article for me to research. More fun than almost any remaining male POY for me.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Manny Harris

added a link pointing to Plus-minus

Scoot Henderson

added a link pointing to Plus-minus

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Louie Caporusso retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi TonyTheTiger! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 00:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Not Ready To Make Nice sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Chorus heard in sample doesn't contextually signify the whole song, which is already understood by either reading the whole article and/or listening the full recording. No indication that omitting the sample would harm such understanding. (Signify ≠ identify)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the past, despite notifications about deletion proposals and nominations on certain file uploads, I've not yet seen you often contest/remove PROD tags from files you uploaded. (Search "proposed deletion" or "nominated for discussion" in your talk archives if you don't know what I mean.) What drove you into contesting a PROD this time? Why haven't you contested such proposals on other uploads in the way you did recently? George Ho (talk) 16:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:George Ho, I disagree with your explanation. The sample seems to represent the song very well, IMO. I am especially confused about the point about listening to the whole recording.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I get your point about one file. Why not other deleted samples that you uploaded?

  As for being confused about point about listening to the whole recording, I was trying to say that listening to the sample would influence my curiosity about and decision to seek and then listen the whole song in the same way that the song title and band name would. But then to identify the song, I have to find info about it either from a DJ/emcee or elsewhere.

  Of course, in a shopping website, a song title and an artist or a band name would drive me into seeking and listening the available sample before listening the whole recording. Unsure whether the same can be said for an experience in an encyclopedic project like this. George Ho (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User:George Ho, Honestly, I don't pay attention to a lot of file deletions. I just happened to be paying attention to this one. I still don't understand your point. The sample provides much broader introduction than the title and band name.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.

Technical news

• The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
• The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.

Miscellaneous

• WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!

---

Hey Tony, I'm a longtime enjoyer of your articles, particularly the Chicago infrastructure info. Out of curiosity, are you planning any particular edits for number 400,000? :-) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 16:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Crunchydillpickle, I see I am at 399460. No plans yet. It might be a few months. I am in busy season. It probably won't happen until October.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

• Elli
• HouseBlaster
• Pickersgill-Cunliffe

• Brianga
• De728631
• Georgewilliamherbert
• Hyacinth (deceased)
• ProveIt
• The Night Watch

Technical news

• Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)

Miscellaneous

• The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more

---

Tony, you're prolific in the featured article / list space. I immensely overhauled NABC Coach of the Year in April. From a cursory review, do you think there'd be much pushback on getting this as FL-class? SportsGuy789 (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your list looks excellent. It has quite a different format than my recently passed List of Football Academic All-America Team Members of the Year. I actually like the way your Divisions are split into separate tables. That differs greatly from the All-America list like my current nominee List of Women's Basketball Academic All-America Team Members of the Year. Did you notice the color from my recent promotion. Many sports team and player articles include team color and I was able to include that at FL in this list. I think your list has a good shot.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool thanks for the feedback. I'm going to abstain from adding colors, as I personally feel it confuses things and adds an element unnecessary to the point of the NABC list, but that's just a stylistic difference of opinion. I'll submit this to FL review to see what others say. I'm doubting there'd be much I have to edit or add, if anything. SportsGuy789 (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MClay1 (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

---

Hello, TonyTheTiger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The List (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TonyTheTiger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alia Fischer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TonyTheTiger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kasey Morlock, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cubs Win Flag has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 01:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

---

I'd like to meet up with other Chicago editors but it seems that the local user group you were part of lost its affiliation several years ago. Do you know what led to its dissolution and would you be interested in working to resume the group's activities? Dan • ✉ 03:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I have done several Chicago meetups, but don't recall much about that Wikimedia User Group. You are free to take the lead for a reinvigoration of the group.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 10:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Do you know where else Chicago meetups are planned, if not via that user group? — Dan Leonard • talk • contribs 23:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dan Leonard, there use to be Meetup pages.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TonyTheTiger! Would love to pick your brain on NBA vs WNBA edits.

I had been working on adding citations and formatting the WNBA Rookie of the Year Award page in the style of other WNBA post-season award pages (see WNBA Most Improved Player Award or WNBA Most Improved Player Award). However, given the increasing interest in the WNBA, there now seems to some crossover in WNBA and NBA edits and editors. So, now the WNBA ROTY award page has been thoroughly re-formatted more in the style of the NBA Rookie of the Year Award and all citations I had been adding to article removed.

Is there a consensus on NBA vs WNBA formatting and table formatting? Still learning my way through the WNBA wiki editing standards and would appreciate any thoughts and insight you have. Thanks! (full transparency: I've also asked @Sportzeditz for their input on this same topic cause I'm very curious!) Mariacricket (talk) 01:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mariacricket, Stylistic consensus on subjects such as this are best pursued at WT:NBA (which covers the NBA, WNBA and G-League).-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

---

Hello, @TonyTheTiger. I am Cowboygilbert and was wondering if you'd be interested in letting me kickstart the W Awards again after its long 10 year slumber in the depths of Wikipedia. From what I understand is that you are the W Award coordinator but there has been no awarding since you got your platinum in 2014. Thank you, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 00:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Cowboygilbert, put me down as coordinator emeritus. Have at it.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 16:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brain has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is User:Luiysia (IRL name is Kelly). My main interests are fashion, music, literature, and history. I am fairly new to Wikipedia editing and I found that there has been very little activity from the Chicago Wikipedia user group since 2020.

I'd like to host a casual meetup in Chicago to celebrate Wikidata Day on Saturday, October 26.

Proposed location is Engine Coffee in the Wicker Park/West Town area, at 11AM.

Here is the official meetup page, where you can add yourself as an attendee.

(If you would prefer not to see messages like this, go ahead and take yourself off this list.)

Hope to see you all there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Malagasy masculine given names has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Roasted (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Jordan Statue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.

If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – Anne drew

You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arts Club of Chicago has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 01:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

• Crisco 1492

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

Maxim

Oversighter changes

Maxim

Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

---